Cited by 178Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

The Dark Triad and dispositional aggression

Jones, Daniel N., Neria, Adon L.·2015·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.021

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, D. N., & Neria, A. L.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
Corresponding author
Jones, Daniel N.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
86
Pages
360-364
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W763544263
Cited by
178
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
12.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
Dark Triad, Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy, callousness, manipulation, physical aggression, hostility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review