Cited by 58Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Mechanisms of change in dialectical behaviour therapy for people with borderline personality disorder

Open access
Mehlum, Lars·2021·Current Opinion in Psychology

Abstract

This paper reviews current knowledge on mechanisms of change targeted in dialectical behaviour therapy for people with borderline personality disorder. Improvements in emotion regulation capacity and the use of coping skills or mindfulness skills helping patients to downregulate emotional reactions and to cope with stressful situations seem to play important roles. In addition, strong therapeutic relationships, where therapists use high levels of validation, seem equally beneficial for treatment outcomes. When therapists actively install hope in their patients and foster the capacity of hopeful thinking in other ways, long-term outcomes seem to improve. A growing body of evidence shows us how neurobiological and epigenetic change in brain regions important to emotion regulation and behaviour control correspond with more favourable treatment outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.08.017

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehlum, L.
Affiliations
University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Mehlum, Lars
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
37
Pages
89-93
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3081326224
Cited by
58
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
dialectical behavior therapy, borderline personality disorder, mechanisms of change, emotion regulation, coping strategies, mindfulness, therapeutic relationship, validation, hope, epigenetic modifications, neurobiological changes
MeSH terms
Dialectical Behavior Therapy, Emotional Regulation, Adaptation, Psychological, Borderline Personality Disorder, Humans, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review