CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 29

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive and neural markers of super-recognisers’ face processing superiority and enhanced cross-age effect

Belanova, Elena, Davis, Josh P., Thompson, Trevor·2018·Cortex
DOI 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.07.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.07.008

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Anastasi, 2005, An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1043, 10.3758/BF03206441 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Backman, 1991, Recognition memory across the adult life span: The role of prior knowledge, Memory & Cognition, 19, 63, 10.3758/BF03198496 · DOI
  3. Balas, 2015, N170 face specificity and face memory depend on hometown size, Neuropsychologia, 69, 211, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Baron-Cohen, 2001, The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 5, 10.1023/A:1005653411471 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Baron-Cohen, 2004, The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163, 10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bate, 2014, The rehabilitation of face recognition impairments: A critical review and future directions, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 491, 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00491 · DOI
  7. Bate, 2010, Socio-emotional functioning and face recognition ability in the normal population, Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 239, 10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.005 · DOI
  8. Behrmann, 2005, Congenital prosopagnosia: Face-blind from birth, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 180, 10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.011 · DOI
  9. Bentin, 1996, Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 551, 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551 · DOI
  10. Bobak, 2016, An in-depth cognitive examination of individuals with superior face recognition skills, Cortex, 82, 48, 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.05.003 · DOI
  11. Bobak, 2016, Solving the border control problem: Evidence of enhanced face matching in individuals with extraordinary face recognition skills, Plos One, 11, 1, 10.1371/journal.pone.0148148 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Bobak, 2016, Super-recognisers in action: Evidence from face-matching and face memory tasks, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 81, 10.1002/acp.3170 · DOI
  13. Bobak, 2016, Detecting superior face recognition skills in a large sample of young British adults, Frontiers in Psychology, 7
  14. Bobak, 2017, Eye-movement strategies in developmental prosopagnosia and “super” face recognition, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 201, 10.1080/17470218.2016.1161059 · DOI
  15. Crawford, 2010, Point and interval estimates of effect sizes for the case-controls design in neuropsychology: Rationale, methods, implementations, and proposed reporting standards, Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27, 245, 10.1080/02643294.2010.513967 · DOI
  16. Davis, 2016, Investigating predictors of superior face recognition ability in police super-recognisers, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 827, 10.1002/acp.3260 · DOI
  17. Deruelle, 2004, Spatial frequency and face processing in children with autism and Asperger syndrome, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 199, 10.1023/B:JADD.0000022610.09668.4c · DOI · Paper page
  18. Duchaine, 2006, The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants, Neuropsychologia, 44, 576, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001 · DOI
  19. Düzel, 1997, Event related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 5973, 10.1073/pnas.94.11.5973 · DOI
  20. Eimer, 2000, Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition, Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 694, 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00285-0 · DOI
  21. Eimer, 2012, Electrophysiological markers of covert face recognition in developmental prosopagnosia, Brain, 135, 542, 10.1093/brain/awr347 · DOI
  22. Harrison, 2009, Evidence for a contact-based explanation of the own-age bias in face recognition, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 264, 10.3758/PBR.16.2.264 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Joyce, 2005, The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: The effect of reference electrode site, Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 2613, 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.07.005 · DOI
  24. Kaltwasser, 2013, Neurocognitive mechanisms of individual differences in face cognition: A replication and extension, Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 861
  25. Konar, 2010, Holistic processing is not correlated with face-identification accuracy, Psychological Science, 21, 38, 10.1177/0956797609356508 · DOI
  26. Kuefner, 2008, Do all babies look alike? Evidence for an other-age effect in adults, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 34, 807, 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.811 · DOI
  27. Lander, 2015, Famous face recognition, face matching and extroversion, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 1769, 10.1080/17470218.2014.988737 · DOI
  28. Li, 2010, Extroversion predicts individual differences in face recognition, Communication & Integrative Biology, 3, 295, 10.4161/cib.3.4.12093 · DOI
  29. Macchi Cassia, 2011, Age biases in face processing: The effects of experience across development, British Journal of Psychology, 102, 816, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02046.x · DOI
  30. Macchi Cassia, 2009, Early experience predicts later plasticity for face processing: Evidence for the reactivation of dormant effects, Psychological Science, 20, 853, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02376.x · DOI
  31. Macchi Cassia, 2009, Why mix-ups don't happen in the nursery. Evidence for an experience-based interpretation of the other-age-effect, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1099, 10.1080/17470210802617654 · DOI · Paper page
  32. MacKenzie, 2007, Dissociating recollection from familiarity: Electrophysiological evidence that familiarity for faces is associated with a posterior old/new effect, Neuroimage, 36, 454, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.005 · DOI
  33. Maurer, 2002, The many faces of configural processing, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255, 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01903-4 · DOI
  34. Megreya, 2013, Individual differences in personality and face identification, Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 30, 10.1080/20445911.2012.739153 · DOI
  35. Meissner, 2001, Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review, Psychology Public Policy and Law, 7, 1, 10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Meissner, 2005, Memory for own and other race faces: A dual-process approach, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 545, 10.1002/acp.1097 · DOI
  37. Minear, 2004, A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli, Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 36, 630, 10.3758/BF03206543 · DOI
  38. Pierce, 2011, The N250 brain potential to personally familiar and newly learned faces and objects, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 1
  39. Richler, 2011, Holistic processing predicts face recognition, Psychological Science, 22, 464, 10.1177/0956797611401753 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Robertson, 2016, Face recognition by metropolitan police super-recognisers, Plos One, 11, e0150036, 10.1371/journal.pone.0150036 · DOI
  41. Russell, 2012, Developmental prosopagnosia and super-recognition: No special role for surface reflectance processing, Neuropsychology, 50, 334, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.004 · DOI
  42. Russell, 2009, Super-recognizers: People with extraordinary face recognition ability, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 252, 10.3758/PBR.16.2.252 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Shakeshaft, 2015, Genetic specificity of face recognition, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 1, 10.1073/pnas.1421881112 · DOI
  44. Tanaka, 2006, Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: The N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1488, 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1488 · DOI
  45. Thompson, 2008, EEG applications for sport and performance, Methods, 45, 279, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.07.006 · DOI
  46. Towler, 2012, Electrophysiological studies of face processing in developmental prosopagnosia: Neuropsychological and neurodevelopmental perspectives, Cognitive Neuropsychology, 29, 37, 10.1080/02643294.2012.716757 · DOI
  47. Turano, 2016, Individual differences in face processing captured by ERPs, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 101, 1, 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.12.009 · DOI
  48. Wang, 2012, Individual differences in holistic processing predict face recognition ability, Psychological Science, 23, 169, 10.1177/0956797611420575 · DOI
  49. White, 2017, Perceptual expertise in forensic facial image comparison, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 282
  50. Wiese, 2012, The role of age and ethnic group in face recognition memory: ERP evidence from a combined own-age and own-race bias study, Biological Psychology, 89, 137, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.002 · DOI
  51. Wiese, 2012, Daily-life contact affects the own-age bias and neural correlates of face memory in elderly participants, Neuropsychologia, 50, 3496, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.022 · DOI
  52. Wiese, 2013, Ageing faces in ageing minds: A review on the own-age bias in face recognition, Visual Cognition, 21, 1337, 10.1080/13506285.2013.823139 · DOI
  53. Wiese, 2013, How experience shapes memory for faces: An event-related potential study on the own-age bias, Biological Psychology, 94, 369, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.07.001 · DOI
  54. Yang, 2014, Electrical simulation over bilateral occipito-temporal regions reduces N170 in the right hemisphere and the composite face effect, Plos One, 9, 1, 10.1371/journal.pone.0115772 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Belanova, E., Davis, J. P., & Thompson, T.
Venue
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
108
Pages
92-111
ISSN
0010-9452
DOI
10.1016/j.cortex.2018.07.008
Cited by
29
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review