The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As examined by Kokolakis (2017) in a comprehensive review, the relationship between privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors is absent or weak at best.”
From Privacy Cynicism and its Role in Privacy Decision-Making (2024) · cites this paper as Kokolakis (2017)
In the citing paper
“Despite the apparent ease with which individuals often seem to disclose their information in exchange for being able to use online services (i.e., Carrascal etal., 2013; see also Kokolakis, 2017), individuals worry about their privacy.”
From Privacy Cynicism and its Role in Privacy Decision-Making (2024) · cites this paper as Kokolakis, 2017
In the citing paper
“The evidence for the existence of the privacy paradox in terms of the absence of a direct link between privacy attitudes and behaviors is mixed (for reviews, see Baruh etal., 2017; Kokolakis, 2017).”
From Privacy Cynicism and its Role in Privacy Decision-Making (2024) · cites this paper as Kokolakis, 2017
In the citing paper
“Therefore, privacy cynicism may be one of the explanations of the incongruence between privacy attitudes and concerns and privacy behaviors (Barnes, 2006; Kokolakis, 2017; Lutz et al., 2020).”
From Privacy Cynicism and its Role in Privacy Decision-Making (2024) · cites this paper as Kokolakis, 2017
In the citing paper
“According to Kokolakis (2017), users might show distinct privacy behavior in different contexts, suggesting that privacy behavior is highly context dependent.”
From Putting the privacy paradox to the test: Online privacy and security behaviors among users with technical knowledge, privacy awareness, and financial resources (2019) · cites this paper as Kokolakis (2017)
In the citing paper
“So far, such factors have usually been studied in isolation and most studies focused on the context of social network sites (SNSs) and e-commerce (cf.Kokolakis, 2017).”
From The privacy and control paradoxes in the context of smartphone apps (2022) · cites this paper as Kokolakis, 2017
In the citing paper
“Several studies reported the privacy paradox in the context of SNSs and e-commerce (for reviews, see Barth and de Jong, 2017;Kokolakis, 2017).”
From The privacy and control paradoxes in the context of smartphone apps (2022) · cites this paper as Kokolakis, 2017
In the citing paper
“Contact tracing as an extreme case of the privacy paradox: which values?”
From Contact tracing apps and values dilemmas: A privacy paradox in a neo-liberal world (2020) · cites this paper as Kokolakis, 2017
In the citing paper
“Otherwise put the covid crisis may be a nice illustration of the privacy paradox which states that we generally value privacy, but when we have an opportunity we are ready to trade it for something else (Kokolakis, 2017).”
From Contact tracing apps and values dilemmas: A privacy paradox in a neo-liberal world (2020) · cites this paper as Kokolakis, 2017
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective
Bandura, A. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 · Cited by 15,510
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0080 · Cited by 2,640
Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.025 · Cited by 2,349
The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors
NORBERG, P. A., HORNE, D. R., & HORNE, D. A. (2007) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x · Cited by 1,526
Solove, D. J. (2006) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · doi:10.2307/40041279 · Cited by 1,388
A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States
Barnes, S. B. (2006) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v11i9.1394 · Cited by 1,336
Facebook and Online Privacy: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Unintended Consequences
Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A.-K., & Hughes, B. N. (2009) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01494.x · Cited by 1,271
Tönnies, F. (1963) · Cited by 1,198
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,001
Data Privacy in the Internet of Things: A Perspective of Personal Data Store-Based Approaches
Pinto, G. P., & Prazeres, C. V. S. (2025) · Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy · doi:10.3390/jcp5020025 · Cited by 13
Motivational Factors in Privacy Protection Behaviour Model for Social Networking
Sedek, M., Ahmad, R., & Othman, N. F. (2018) · MATEC Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/matecconf/201815005014 · Cited by 13
Buck, C., Dinev, T., & Anaraky, R. G. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82786-1_3 · Cited by 13
Sensing privacy: Extending consumer privacy research through a consumer culture theory approach
Horppu, J. (2023) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/14705931231175698 · Cited by 17
Dependent Variables in the Privacy-Related Field: A Descriptive Literature Review
Wirth, J. (2018) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2018.463 · Cited by 14
Rudnicka, A., Cox, A. L., & Gould, S. J. J. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300622 · Cited by 15
Awareness of Indirect Information Disclosure on Social Network Sites
Padyab, A. M., Päivärinta, T., Ståhlbröst, A., & Bergvall‐Kåreborn, B. (2019) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118824199 · Cited by 14
Jung, K., Park, Y., Kim, H., & Lee, J. (2022) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3491101.3519774 · Cited by 13
Consumers’ Need of Privacy Protection – Experimental Results
Babula, E., Mrzygłód, U., & Poszewiecki, A. (2017) · Economics & Sociology · doi:10.14254/2071-789x.2017/10-2/6 · Cited by 13
Apthorpe, N., Varghese, S., & Feamster, N. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.05152 · Cited by 13
A study on information privacy concerns and expectations of demographic groups in South Africa
da Veiga, A. (2022) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105769 · Cited by 12
Un-Paradoxing Privacy: Considering Hopeful Trust
Knowles, B., & Conchie, S. M. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3609329 · Cited by 14
Umbach, R., Singh, A., & Walker, A. M. (2023) · Journal of Online Trust and Safety · doi:10.54501/jots.v2i1.114 · Cited by 12
The rise of “security and privacy”: bibliometric analysis of computer privacy research
Ali, A. S., Zaaba, Z. F., & Singh, M. M. (2023) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-023-00761-4 · Cited by 12
Is Your Privacy for Sale? An Experiment on the Willingness to Reveal Sensitive Information
Cloos, J., Frank, B., Kampenhuber, L., Karam, S., Luong, N., Möller, D., Monge-Larrain, M., Dat, N. T., Nilgen, M., & Rößler, C. (2019) · Games · doi:10.3390/g10030028 · Cited by 12
Virtue Ethics as a Solution to the Privacy Paradox and Trust in Emerging Technologies
Bilal, A., Wingreen, S. C., & Sharma, R. (2020) · International Conference on Information Science and Systems (ICISS) · doi:10.1145/3388176.3388196 · Cited by 12
Deciding on Personalized Ads: Nudging Developers About User Privacy
Tahaei, M., Frik, A., & Vaniea, K. E. (2021) · Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) · doi:10.7488/ds/3045 · Cited by 12
Consent is an organizational behavior issue
Bohns, V. K., & Schlund, R. (2020) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2021.100138 · Cited by 13
A market for digital privacy: consumers’ willingness to trade personal data and money
D’Annunzio, A., & Menichelli, E. (2022) · Journal of Industrial and Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s40812-022-00221-5 · Cited by 12
Rehman, S. U., Manickam, S., & Al-Charchafchi, A. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11459-w · Cited by 12
Privacy Concerns and Acceptance Factors of OSINT for Cybersecurity: A Representative Survey
Riebe, T., Biselli, T., Kaufhold, M., & Reuter, C. (2023) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.56553/popets-2023-0028 · Cited by 15
Wearable Device Data and Privacy: A study of Perception and Behavior
Hallam, C. R. A., & Zanella, G. (2016) · World Journal of Management · doi:10.21102/wjm.2016.03.71.06 · Cited by 12
Bandara, R. J., Fernando, M., & Akter, S. (2018) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2018.465 · Cited by 12
Digitale Transformation und Unternehmensführung
Schellinger, J., Tokarski, K. O., & Kissling-Näf, I. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-26960-9 · Cited by 12
The self-assessed information security skills of the Finnish population: A regression analysis
Kyytsönen, M., Ikonen, J., Aalto, A., & Vehko, T. (2022) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2022.102732 · Cited by 12
Vgena, K., Kitsiou, A., Kalloniatis, C., & Gritzalis, S. (2022) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi14090249 · Cited by 12
Online Surveillance and Education for Digital Competence
Samuelsson, L., & Lindström, N. (2022) · Athens Journal of Education · doi:10.30958/aje.9-4-1 · Cited by 12
Supporting Informed Choices about Browser Cookies: The Impact of Personalised Cookie Banners
Biselli, T., Utz, L., & Reuter, C. (2023) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.56553/popets-2024-0011 · Cited by 11
Šolić, K., Velki, T., Fosic, I., & Vuković, M. (2023) · Acta Polytechnica Hungarica · doi:10.12700/aph.21.4.2024.4.3 · Cited by 11
Privacy concerns and social desirability bias
Larson, R. B. (2023) · International Journal of Market Research · doi:10.1177/14707853231222810 · Cited by 11
Yuan, X., Ye, H., Tang, Z., Zhu, X., Yao, Y., & Tong, X. (2023) · International Symposium of Chinese CHI (Chinese CHI) · doi:10.1145/3629606.3629618 · Cited by 11
Trust Through Recommendation in E-commerce
Saxborn, M., Pan, Y., & Said, A. (2024) · Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3627508.3638294 · Cited by 11
Fejes-Vékássy, L., Ujhelyi, A., & Lantos, N. A. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-06496-2 · Cited by 12
Kayes, A. S. M., Rahayu, W. J., Dillon, T. S., Shahraki, A. S., & Alavizadeh, H. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3481316 · Cited by 11
Paliński, M., Jusypenko, B., & Hardy, W. (2025) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104233 · Cited by 11
Cao, B., & Wen, C. (2025) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2025.102263 · Cited by 12
Why We Disclose on Social Media? Towards a Dual-Pathway Model
Bai, Q., Dan, Q., Choi, Y., & Luo, S. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15040547 · Cited by 11
Privacy on the road Evaluating German consumers' intention to use connected cars
Reith, R., & Buck, C. (2020) · International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management · doi:10.1504/ijatm.2020.10032741 · Cited by 11
Srivastava, D. K., & Roychoudhury, B. (2021) · Journal of Global Information Technology Management · doi:10.1080/1097198x.2021.1954416 · Cited by 13
Privacy Calculus Theory in the Digital Government Context: The Case of Taiwan’s New eID Policy
Huang, Z., & Huang, T.-Y. (2022) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393221117500 · Cited by 11
Privacy calculus: Factors that influence the perception of benefit
Gómez‐Barroso, J. L., Feijóo, C., & Martínez, I. J. M. (2018) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2018.mar.12 · Cited by 11
A Privacy-Enhanced Friending Approach for Users on Multiple Online Social Networks
Aghasian, E., Garg, S., & Montgomery, J. (2018) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers7030042 · Cited by 11
A policy-based containerized filter for secure information sharing in organizational environments
Gonzalez-Compean, J. L., Telles, O., López-Arévalo, I., Morales‐Sandoval, M., Sosa‐Sosa, V. J., & Carretero, J. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.01.002 · Cited by 11
The (Co-)Location Sharing Game
Olteanu, A.-M., Humbert, M., Huguenin, K., & Hubaux, J. (2019) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.2478/popets-2019-0017 · Cited by 11
Avoiding the Privacy Paradox Using Preference-Based Segmentation: A Conjoint Analysis Approach
Kuzmanović, M., & Savic, G. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9091382 · Cited by 11
Oxymorons of privacy and surveillance in “smart homes”
Doty, P. (2020) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.222 · Cited by 11
On the Relationship Between IT Privacy and Security Behavior: A Survey Among German Private Users
Biselli, T., & Reuter, C. (2021) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86797-3_26 · Cited by 11
Döring, N. M. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-18016-4_8 · Cited by 12
Framing the future of privacy: citizens’ metaphors for privacy in the coming digital society
Minkkinen, M., Auffermann, B., & Heinonen, S. (2017) · European Journal of Futures Research · doi:10.1007/s40309-017-0115-7 · Cited by 11
Exploring user perceptions of deletion in mobile instant messaging applications
Schnitzler, T., Utz, C., Farke, F. M., Pöpper, C., & Dürmuth, M. (2020) · Journal of Cybersecurity · doi:10.1093/cybsec/tyz016 · Cited by 10
von Kalckreuth, N., & Feufel, M. A. (2024) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/52625 · Cited by 10
Slane, A., & Pedersen, I. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-01894-3 · Cited by 11
Shim, H., Cho, J., & Sung, Y. H. (2024) · Asian Communication Research · doi:10.20879/acr.2024.21.019 · Cited by 11
Keeping Fit & Staying Safe: A Systematic Review of Women's Use of Social Media for Fitness
Dennehy, D. P., Murphy, S., Foley, S., McCarthy, J., & Morrissey, K. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103361 · Cited by 10
A dimensionalised privacy behaviour model: an empirical test of a conceptual proposition
Epstein, D., & Quinn, K. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2024.2443523 · Cited by 12
Jylhä, V., Hirvonen, N., & Haider, J. (2025) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2025.2470227 · Cited by 10
Grimme, S. A., Spoerl, S. M., Jung, F., & Koelle, M. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713702 · Cited by 10
Sağlam, R. B., Yuan, H., Heering, M. S., Ashraf, R., & Li, S. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16070514 · Cited by 12
Data vulnerability: does privacy protection behaviour improve digital well-being?
Quach, S., Dang, S., Thaichon, P., Le, D., & Le, T. H. (2025) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-12-2022-0953 · Cited by 10
Chung, M. (2025) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-186 · Cited by 10
Respecting the Individuals of Data Economy Ecosystems
Rantanen, M. M., & Koskinen, J. S. S. (2020) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57847-3_13 · Cited by 12
A preliminary investigation of gamification from the young consumer’s perspective
Hass, D., Hass, A., & Joseph, M. (2021) · Young Consumers Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers · doi:10.1108/yc-10-2020-1221 · Cited by 10
Gender and the privacy paradox in Chinese college students’ locative dating communication
Peng, A. Y. (2021) · Global Media and China · doi:10.1177/20594364211017333 · Cited by 10
It’s now or never! Future discounting in the application of the online privacy calculus
Lünich, M., Marcinkowski, F., & Kieslich, K. (2021) · Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2021-3-11 · Cited by 10
Online private self-disclosure’s potential for experiential value co-creation
Haji, I. H. A., Peluso, A. M., & de Jong, A. (2021) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-04-2019-0302 · Cited by 10
Better Angry Than Afraid: The Case of Post Data Breach Emotions on Customer Engagement
Angelis, J. N., Murthy, R. S., Beaulieu, T. Y., & Miller, J. C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2022.3189599 · Cited by 10
Ma, X., Li, J., Guo, F., Cui, C., Chen, T., Xv, F., & Wang, W. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.999229 · Cited by 10
Liu, J., Škorić, M. M., & Li, C. (2023) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2023.2178830 · Cited by 11
Point of no Undo: Irreversible Interactions as a Design Strategy
Rossmy, B., Terzimehić, N., Döring, T., Buschek, D., & Wiethoff, A. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581433 · Cited by 10
SOSYAL MEDYADA MAHREMİYETİN YİTİMİ: TikTok ÖRNEĞİ
KÖSEOĞLU, A. (2023) · İNİF E - Dergi · doi:10.47107/inifedergi.1150606 · Cited by 10
Nontargets: Understanding the Apathy Towards the Israeli Security Agency’s COVID-19 Surveillance
Duke, S. A. (2021) · Surveillance & Society · doi:10.24908/ss.v19i1.14271 · Cited by 10
Roberts, C., Herzing, J. M. E., Piazza, J. S., Abbet, P., & Gática-Pérez, D. (2022) · Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology · doi:10.1093/jssam/smac018 · Cited by 10
Android Permission Manager, Visual Cues, and their Effect on Privacy Awareness and Privacy Literacy
Schmitt, V., Poikela, M. E., & Möller, S. (2022) · International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES) · doi:10.1145/3538969.3543790 · Cited by 10
Consumer Attitude and Reaction towards Personalised Pricing in the E-Commerce Sector
Victor, V., Fekete‐Farkas, M., & Lakner, Z. (2019) · GATR Journal of Management and Marketing Review · doi:10.35609/jmmr.2019.4.2(6 · Cited by 10
Concern for Information Privacy: A Cross-Nation Study of the United Kingdom and South Africa
da Veiga, A., & Ophoff, J. (2020) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57404-8_2 · Cited by 10
Determinants of Purchase Intention in Social Media Advertising
Tirtayani, I. G. A., Wardana, I. M., Setiawan, P. Y., & K, I. G. N. J. A. W. (2024) · Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental · doi:10.24857/rgsa.v18n6-016 · Cited by 9
Yu, L., Li, R., & Cheng, S. (2025) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-025-00805-8 · Cited by 9
Shu, S., Luo, Q., & Chen, Z. (2025) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-025-01236-y · Cited by 10
Decoding the Personalization-Privacy Paradox: From Thematic Scholarly Clusters to Practical Insights
Duralia, O. A., Ogrean, C., Țichindelean, M., & Țichindelean, M.-T. (2025) · Studies in Business and Economics · doi:10.2478/sbe-2025-0025 · Cited by 12
Who uses general-purpose AI? A typology of ChatGPT early adopters
Gerling, C., Teubner, T., & Braesemann, F. (2026) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-025-00853-0 · Cited by 11
Hannibal, G., Dobrosovestnova, A., & Weiss, A. (2022) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man53752.2022.9900830 · Cited by 9
I do. Do I? – Understanding User Perspectives on the Privacy Paradox
Jung, F., von Holdt, K., Krüger, R., Meyer, J., & Heuten, W. (2022) · International Academic Mindtrek Conference (Mindtrek) · doi:10.1145/3569219.3569358 · Cited by 9
People want reassurance when making privacy-related decisions — Not technicalities
Kulyk, O., Renaud, K., & Costica, S. (2023) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2023.111620 · Cited by 9
Virtual Reality as a mean for increasing privacy awareness: The escape room example
Maragkoudaki, S. N., & Kalloniatis, C. (2022) · Panhellenic Conference on Informatics · doi:10.1145/3575879.3576002 · Cited by 9
Human Factors in Privacy Research
Gerber, N., Stöver, A., & Marky, K. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-28643-8 · Cited by 12
Information security risks and sharing behavior on OSN: the impact of data collection awareness
Pham, T. H., Phan, T.-A., Trinh, P.-A., Bach, X., & Le, Q.-C. (2023) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-06-2023-0076 · Cited by 9
Understanding smartphone users’ app usage with restricted permissions
Maseeh, H. I., Jebarajakirthy, C., Achchuthan, S., Ross, M., & Rehman, M. (2024) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-03-2022-0200 · Cited by 9
(Data-) Cooperatives in health and social care: a scoping review
Lauer, R., Merkel, S., Bosompem, J., Langer, H., Naeve, P., Herten, B., Burmann, A., Vollmar, H. C., Otte, I. C., Brand, A. M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s10389-024-02226-x · Cited by 9
Xin, H., Liu, F., & Wei, Z. (2024) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-01-2024-0051 · Cited by 9
Auliya, S. F., Kudina, O., Ding, A. Y., & van de Poel, I. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00588-2 · Cited by 12
Liu, X.-G., & Shi, Z. (2025) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.2428 · Cited by 8
Ctrl-Shift: How Privacy Sentiment Changed from 2019 to 2021
Goetzen, A., Dooley, S. W., & Redmiles, E. M. (2022) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.56553/popets-2022-0118 · Cited by 12
Situation-based privacy autonomous management for mobile social networks
Teles, A. S., Silva, F., & Endler, M. (2017) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2017.04.003 · Cited by 10
Comparing Hypothetical and Realistic Privacy Valuations
Tan, J., Sharif, M., Bhagavatula, S., Beckerle, M., Mazurek, M. L., & Bauer, L. (2018) · Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society · doi:10.1145/3267323.3268961 · Cited by 9
Perception of Information Sensitivity for Internet Users in Saudi Arabia
Almotairi, K. H., & Bataineh, B. (2020) · Acta Informatica Pragensia · doi:10.18267/j.aip.141 · Cited by 9
Xiao, Y., Xu, W., Zeng, S., & Qiao, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.747239 · Cited by 9
An investigation of individual willingness to pay ransomware
Cartwright, A., Cartwright, E. J., Xue, L., & Hernandez-Castro, J. C. (2022) · Journal of Financial Crime · doi:10.1108/jfc-02-2022-0055 · Cited by 10
Henke, J., Joeckel, S., & Dogruel, L. (2018) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2018.1458902 · Cited by 11
Paths to social licence for tracking-data analytics in university research and services
White, J. P., Dennis, S. J., Tomko, M., Bell, J., & Winter, S. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251964 · Cited by 9
Privacy Perceptions of Custom GPTs by Users and Creators
Ma, R., Maidhof, C., Carrillo, J. C., Lindqvist, J., & Such, J. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713540 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Kokolakis, S.
- Affiliations
- University of the Aegean (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Kokolakis, Spyros
- ORCID
- Kokolakis, Spyros
- Venue
- Computers & Security
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 64
- Pages
- 122-134
- ISSN
- 0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2207884471
- Semantic Scholar
- e041cf62681944a874a712ba216441cf117f4139
- Cited by
- 1,229
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 142 · 2025: 164 · 2024: 129 · 2023: 165 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 142 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 36
- FWCI
- 129.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers & Security (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Keywords
- privacy paradox, privacy attitudes, privacy behavior, personal information disclosure, social networking sites, privacy concerns, behavioral economics, self-reported behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
