The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As examined by Kokolakis (2017) in a comprehensive review, the relationship between privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors is absent or weak at best.”
From Privacy Cynicism and its Role in Privacy Decision-Making (2024) · cites this paper as Kokolakis (2017)
In the citing paper
“Despite the apparent ease with which individuals often seem to disclose their information in exchange for being able to use online services (i.e., Carrascal etal., 2013; see also Kokolakis, 2017), individuals worry about their privacy.”
From Privacy Cynicism and its Role in Privacy Decision-Making (2024) · cites this paper as Kokolakis, 2017
In the citing paper
“The evidence for the existence of the privacy paradox in terms of the absence of a direct link between privacy attitudes and behaviors is mixed (for reviews, see Baruh etal., 2017; Kokolakis, 2017).”
From Privacy Cynicism and its Role in Privacy Decision-Making (2024) · cites this paper as Kokolakis, 2017
In the citing paper
“Therefore, privacy cynicism may be one of the explanations of the incongruence between privacy attitudes and concerns and privacy behaviors (Barnes, 2006; Kokolakis, 2017; Lutz et al., 2020).”
From Privacy Cynicism and its Role in Privacy Decision-Making (2024) · cites this paper as Kokolakis, 2017
In the citing paper
“According to Kokolakis (2017), users might show distinct privacy behavior in different contexts, suggesting that privacy behavior is highly context dependent.”
From Putting the privacy paradox to the test: Online privacy and security behaviors among users with technical knowledge, privacy awareness, and financial resources (2019) · cites this paper as Kokolakis (2017)
In the citing paper
“So far, such factors have usually been studied in isolation and most studies focused on the context of social network sites (SNSs) and e-commerce (cf.Kokolakis, 2017).”
From The privacy and control paradoxes in the context of smartphone apps (2022) · cites this paper as Kokolakis, 2017
In the citing paper
“Several studies reported the privacy paradox in the context of SNSs and e-commerce (for reviews, see Barth and de Jong, 2017;Kokolakis, 2017).”
From The privacy and control paradoxes in the context of smartphone apps (2022) · cites this paper as Kokolakis, 2017
In the citing paper
“Contact tracing as an extreme case of the privacy paradox: which values?”
From Contact tracing apps and values dilemmas: A privacy paradox in a neo-liberal world (2020) · cites this paper as Kokolakis, 2017
In the citing paper
“Otherwise put the covid crisis may be a nice illustration of the privacy paradox which states that we generally value privacy, but when we have an opportunity we are ready to trade it for something else (Kokolakis, 2017).”
From Contact tracing apps and values dilemmas: A privacy paradox in a neo-liberal world (2020) · cites this paper as Kokolakis, 2017
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective
Bandura, A. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 · Cited by 15,510
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0080 · Cited by 2,640
Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.025 · Cited by 2,349
The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors
NORBERG, P. A., HORNE, D. R., & HORNE, D. A. (2007) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x · Cited by 1,526
Solove, D. J. (2006) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · doi:10.2307/40041279 · Cited by 1,388
A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States
Barnes, S. B. (2006) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v11i9.1394 · Cited by 1,336
Facebook and Online Privacy: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Unintended Consequences
Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A.-K., & Hughes, B. N. (2009) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01494.x · Cited by 1,271
Tönnies, F. (1963) · Cited by 1,198
Privacy and rationality in individual decision making
Acquisti, A., & Grossklags, J. (2005) · IEEE Security and Privacy Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2005.22 · Cited by 1,123
Can You See Me Now? Audience and Disclosure Regulation in Online Social Network Sites
Tüfekçi, Z. (2007) · Bulletin of Science Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/0270467607311484 · Cited by 946
The Effect of Online Privacy Information on Purchasing Behavior: An Experimental Study
Tsai, J., Egelman, S., Cranor, L. F., & Acquisti, A. (2010) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1090.0260 · Cited by 922
Xu, H., Luo, X. (., Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.017 · Cited by 708
Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2009) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0226 · Cited by 696
Taddicken, M. (2013) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12052 · Cited by 666
Neural mechanisms mediating optimism bias
Sharot, T., Riccardi, A. M., Raio, C. M., & Phelps, E. A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06280 · Cited by 659
Internet Users’ Information Privacy-Protective Responses: A Taxonomy and a Nomological MODEL1
Son, J.-Y., & Kim, S. S. (2008) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148854 · Cited by 632
Facebook privacy settings: Who cares?
boyd, D., & Hargittai, E. (2010) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v15i8.3086 · Cited by 565
Privacy in electronic commerce and the economics of immediate gratification
Acquisti, A. (2004) · Proceedings of the 5th ACM conference on Electronic commerce · doi:10.1145/988772.988777 · Cited by 561
Misplaced Confidences: Privacy and the Control Paradox
Brandimarte, L., Acquisti, A., & Loewenstein, G. (2013) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550612455931 · Cited by 522
Overcoming Online Information Privacy Concerns: An Information-Processing Theory Approach
Hann, I.-H., Hui, K.-L., Lee, S. T., & Png, I. (2007) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222240202 · Cited by 482
E-privacy in 2nd generation E-commerce
Spiekermann, S., Großklags, J., & Berendt, B. (2001) · ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC) · doi:10.1145/501158.501163 · Cited by 454
Dienlin, T., & Trepte, S. (2014) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2049 · Cited by 453
Privacy practices of Internet users: Self-reports versus observed behavior
Jensen, C., Potts, C., & Jensen, C. (2005) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.019 · Cited by 431
Sutanto, J., Palme, E., Tan, C.-H., & Phang, C. W. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.4.07 · Cited by 412
Kehr, F., Kowatsch, T., Wentzel, D., & Fleisch, E. (2015) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12062 · Cited by 410
PRIVACY PROTECTION STRATEGIES ON FACEBOOK: The Internet privacy paradox revisited
Young, A. L., & Quan-Haase, A. (2013) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2013.777757 · Cited by 345
Jiang, Z. J., Heng, C. S., & Choi, B. C. F. (2013) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1120.0441 · Cited by 317
Bounded Rationality in Individual Decision Making
Camerer, C. F. (1998) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/bf01669302 · Cited by 307
Negotiating Privacy Concerns and Social Capital Needs in a Social Media Environment
Ellison, N. B., Jessica Vitak, B., Steinfield, C. W., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. A. C. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6_3 · Cited by 286
Privacy concerns and identity in online social networks
Krasnova, H., Günther, O., Spiekermann, S., & Koroleva, K. (2009) · Identity in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s12394-009-0019-1 · Cited by 257
Disclosure Antecedents in an Online Service Context: The Role of Sensitivity of Information
Mothersbaugh, D. L., Foxx, W. K., Beatty, S. E., & Wang, S. (2012) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670511424924 · Cited by 257
Miltgen, C. L., & Peyrat‐Guillard, D. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2013.17 · Cited by 241
Huberman, B. A., Adar, E., & Fine, L. R. (2005) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msp.2005.137 · Cited by 239
Unwillingness to pay for privacy: A field experiment
Beresford, A. R., Kübler, D. F., & Preibusch, S. (2012) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.077 · Cited by 230
Cho, H., Lee, J., & Chung, S. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.012 · Cited by 217
What Can Behavioral Economics Teach Us about Privacy?
Grossklags, J., & Acquisti, A. (2007) · Auerbach Publications eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420052183-29 · Cited by 203
Lee, H., Park, H., & Kim, J. (2013) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.01.005 · Cited by 197
E-privacy in 2nd Generation E-Commerce: Privacy Preferences Versus Actual Behavior
Spiekermann, S., Grossklags, J., & Berendt, B. (2001) · Cited by 189
The influence of user affect in online information disclosure
Wakefield, R. (2013) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2013.01.003 · Cited by 172
Bounded Rationality in Individual Decision Making
Camerer, C. F. (1998) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1023/a:1009944326196 · Cited by 171
Your browsing behavior for a big mac
Carrascal, J. P., Riederer, C., Erramilli, V., Cherubini, M., & de Oliveira, R. C. (2013) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2488388.2488406 · Cited by 165
The social impact of computers
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-0975 · Cited by 141
Choice Architecture and Smartphone Privacy: There’s a Price for That
Egelman, S., Felt, A. P., & Wagner, D. (2013) · The Economics of Information Security and Privacy · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39498-0_10 · Cited by 131
Baek, Y. M., Kim, E., & Bae, Y. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.010 · Cited by 113
Privacy in Interaction: Exploring Disclosure and Social Capital in Facebook
Stutzman, F., Jessica Vitak, B., Ellison, N. B., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. A. C. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v6i1.14268 · Cited by 94
Solving the privacy paradox: A counter-argument experimental approach
Baek, Y. M. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.006 · Cited by 88
Election security: perception and reality
Evans, D., & Paul, N. (2004) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msecp.2004.1264850 · Cited by 72
Lutz, C., & Strathoff, P. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2425132 · Cited by 69
(2012) · ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) · Cited by 66
Unlocking the privacy paradox: do cognitive heuristics hold the key?
Sundar, S. S., Kang, H., Wu, M., Go, E., & Zhang, B. (2013) · CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2468356.2468501 · Cited by 64
Sharing Ephemeral Information in Online Social Networks: Privacy Perceptions and Behaviours
Reynolds, B., Venkatanathan, J., Gonçalves, J., & Kostakos, V. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23765-2_14 · Cited by 62
Privacy Risk Perceptions and Privacy Protection Strategies
Oomen, I., & Leenes, R. E. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77996-6_10 · Cited by 59
Zafeiropoulou, A. M., Millard, D. E., Webber, C., & O'Hara, K. (2013) · Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2464464.2464503 · Cited by 53
Type Indeterminacy in Privacy Decisions: The Privacy Paradox Revisited
Flender, C., & Müller, G. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35659-9_14 · Cited by 46
Your browsing behavior for a Big Mac: Economics of Personal Information OnlinePreprint
Carrascal, J. P., Riederer, C., Erramilli, V., Cherubini, M., & de Oliveira, R. C. (2011) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1112.6098 · Cited by 44
Studying the Internet Experience
Brown, B. A. T. (2001) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 41
Rethinking the Privacy Calculus: On the Role of Dispositional Factors and Affect
Kehr, F., Wentzel, D., & Mayer, P. B. (2013) · Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) · Cited by 34
Privacy evaluation: what empirical research on users’ valuation of personal data tells us
Morando, F., Iemma, R., & Raiteri, E. (2014) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2014.2.283 · Cited by 33
Trading Secrets For Savings: How Concerned Are Consumers About Club Cards As a Privacy Threat?
Sayre, S., & Horne, D. A. (2000) · ACR North American Advances · Cited by 29
Privacy and Social Networks: Is Concern a Valid Indicator of Intention and Behaviour?
Hughes‐Roberts, T. (2013) · International Conference on Social Computing · doi:10.1109/socialcom.2013.140 · Cited by 27
Self-Reported Social Network Behavior: Accuracy Predictors and Implications for the Privacy Paradox
Staddon, J., Acquisti, A., & LeFevre, K. (2013) · International Conference on Social Computing · doi:10.1109/socialcom.2013.48 · Cited by 24
The Privacy Paradox: The Case of Secondary Disclosure
D'souza, G., & Phelps, J. E. (2009) · Review of Marketing Science · doi:10.2202/1546-5616.1072 · Cited by 20
(2014) · Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) · Cited by 18
(2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 16
The online privacy paradox: a social representations perspective
Oetzel, M. C., & Gonja, T. (2011) · CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1979742.1979887 · Cited by 16
Policies and Research in Identity Management
de Leeuw, E., Tseng, J., Fischer-Hübner, S., & Borking, J. J. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77996-6 · Cited by 7
Berleur, J., Beardon, C., & Laufer, R. (1993) · North-Holland eBooks · Cited by 5
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barth, S., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2017) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013 · Cited by 798
“We did however, find a review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon (Kokolakis, 2017).”
BackgroundStephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., Antona, M., Chen, J. Y. C., Dong, J., Duffy, V. G., Fang, X., Fidopiastis, C., Fragomeni, G., Fu, L. P., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259 · Cited by 524
Pitardi, V., & Marriott, H. R. (2021) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21457 · Cited by 455
Gerber, N., Gerber, P., & Volkamer, M. (2018) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2018.04.002 · Cited by 511
Six Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Grand Challenges
Ozmen Garibay, O., Winslow, B., Andolina, S., Antona, M., Bodenschatz, A., Coursaris, C., Falco, G., Fiore, S. M., Garibay, I., Grieman, K., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2153320 · Cited by 501
Metadata
- Authors
- Kokolakis, S.
- Affiliations
- University of the Aegean (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Kokolakis, Spyros
- ORCID
- Kokolakis, Spyros
- Venue
- Computers & Security
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 64
- Pages
- 122-134
- ISSN
- 0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2207884471
- Semantic Scholar
- e041cf62681944a874a712ba216441cf117f4139
- Cited by
- 1,229
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 142 · 2025: 164 · 2024: 129 · 2023: 165 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 142 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 36
- FWCI
- 129.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers & Security (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Keywords
- privacy paradox, privacy attitudes, privacy behavior, personal information disclosure, social networking sites, privacy concerns, behavioral economics, self-reported behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
