Cited by 541Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseInjury Epidemiology and Prevention

Factors associated with suicidal phenomena in adolescents: a systematic review of population-based studies

Evans, Emma, Hawton, Keith, Rodham, Karen·2004·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Suicidal phenomena (suicide attempts, deliberate self-harm, and suicidal plans, threats and thoughts) are common in adolescents. Identification of factors associated with these phenomena could play an important role in the development of school or community-based prevention and intervention programs. In this article, we report the results of a systematic review of the international literature on population-based studies of factors associated with suicidal phenomena in adolescents. These factors encompass psychiatric, psychological, physical, personal, familial and social domains. The quantity of evidence in support of associations between suicidal phenomena and specific factors is compared with the quantity of evidence against such associations. We conclude with a summary of the findings, including identification of new or neglected areas, which require further investigation. Methodological considerations are highlighted and implications of the findings for clinicians and other professionals concerned with prevention of suicidal behavior by adolescents are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.04.005

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Suicide is much more prevalent in those with mental illness than in the general population.

    “Suicide is also much more prevalent in those with mental illness than in the general population, 214”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [214]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, E., Hawton, K., & Rodham, K.
Affiliations
Warneford Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Evans, Emma
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-12
Volume
24
Issue
8
Pages
957-979
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152905391
Cited by
541
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 29
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Keywords
adolescents, suicide attempts, self-harm, suicide planning, suicidal threats, suicidal ideation, risk factors, protective factors, family factors, social factors, psychiatric risk factors, suicide prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Mental Disorders, Family Relations, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Social Support, Suicide, Attempted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review