Cited by 192Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseMental Health via Writing

Distinguishing adolescents who think about self-harm from those who engage in self-harm

Open access
O'Connor, Rory C., Rasmussen, Susan, Hawton, Keith·2012·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Adolescent self-harm is a major public health concern, yet little is known about the factors that distinguish adolescents who think about self-harm but do not act on these thoughts from those who act on such thoughts. Aims: Within a new theoretical model, the integrated motivational–volitional model, we investigated factors associated with adolescents having thoughts of self-harm (ideators) v. those associated with self-harm enaction (enactors). Method: Observational study of school pupils employing an anonymous self-report survey to compare three groups of adolescents: self-harm enactors ( n = 628) v. self-harm ideators ( n = 675) v. those without any self-harm history ( n = 4219). Results: Enactors differed from ideators on all of the volitional factors. Relative to ideators, enactors were more likely to have a family member/close friend who had self-harmed, more likely to think that their peers engaged in self-harm and they were more impulsive than the ideators. Enactors also reported more life stress than ideators. Conversely, the two self-harm groups did not differ on any of the variables associated with the development of self-harm thoughts. Conclusions: As more adolescents think about self-harm than engage in it, a better understanding of the factors that govern behavioural enaction is crucial in the effective assessment of the risk of self-harm.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.097808

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has been supportive of the utility of VMs for differentiating between adolescents with self-harm ideation and those who enact the behaviour.

    “research has been supportive of the utility of VMs for differentiating between adolescents with self-harm ideation and those who enact the behaviour [64]”
  • This study adds to the growing literature highlighting the importance of the volitional phase factors within the IMV model and the ideation-to-action framework more generally.

    “This study adds to the growing literature highlighting the importance of the volitional phase factors within the IMV model (e.g., O'Connor et al., 2012; Dhingra et al., 2015) and the ideation-to-action framework more generally (Klonsky et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [2]2. Hawton K, Harriss L, Hall S, Simkin S, Bale E, Bond A. A time of change in patient characteristics. Psychol Med 2003; 33: 987-96.
  2. [3]3. Hawton K, van Heeringen K. Suicide. Lancet 2009; 373: 1372-81.
  3. [13]13. Williams JMG. The Cry of Pain. Penguin, 2001.
  4. [20]20. Morey C, Corcoran P, Arensman E, Perry IJ. The prevalence of self-reported deliberate self harm in Irish adolescents. BMC Public Health 2008; 8: 79.
  5. [24]24. O'Connor RC, Rasmussen S, Hawton K. Predicting depression, anxiety and self-harm in adolescents: the role of perfectionism and acute life stress. Behav Res Ther 2010; 48: 52-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Connor, R. C., Rasmussen, S., & Hawton, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2012-04
Volume
200
Issue
4
Pages
330-335
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2094556310
Cited by
192
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
10.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
adolescent self-harm, self-harm ideation, integrated motivational-volitional model, impulsivity, life events, peer influence, risk assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Female, Humans, Ireland, Male, Risk Factors, Scotland, Self-Injurious Behavior, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review