CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 279Eating Disorders and BehaviorsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 152 of the 154 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An eating disorder-specific model of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT-ED): Causal pathways and treatment implications

Open access
Rieger, Elizabeth, Van Buren, Dorothy J., Bishop, Monica, Tanofsky-Kraff, Marian, Welch, Robinson, Wilfley, Denise E.·2010·Clinical Psychology Review
DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.02.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Several studies support the efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) in the treatment of eating disorders. Treatment outcomes are likely to be augmented through a greater understanding, and hence treatment targeting, of the mechanisms whereby IPT induces therapeutic gains. To this end, the present paper seeks to develop a theoretical model of IPT in the context of eating disorders (IPT-ED). After providing a brief description of IPT, the IPT-ED model is presented and research supporting its theorized mechanisms is summarized. This model proposes that negative social evaluation plays a pivotal role as both a cause (via its detrimental impact on self evaluation and associated affect) and consequence of eating disorder symptoms. In the final section, key eating disorder constructs (namely, the developmental period of adolescence, clinical perfectionism, cognitive dysfunction, and affect regulation) are re-interpreted from the standpoint of negative social evaluation thereby further explicating IPT's efficacy as an intervention for individuals with an eating disorder.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.02.001

Cites

152 of 152 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Harter, 2006, The self, Vol. 3, 505
  2. Wilfley, 1997, Toward an integrated model of risk for binge eating disorder, Journal of Gender, Culture, and Health, 2, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 279

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rieger, E., Van Buren, D. J., Bishop, M., Tanofsky-Kraff, M., Welch, R., & Wilfley, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Rieger, Elizabeth
ORCID
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
400-410
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cpr.2010.02.001
OpenAlex
W2073773509
Cited by
279
References
154
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
interpersonal psychotherapy, eating disorders, self-assessment, emotion regulation, clinical perfectionism, cognitive impairment, adolescent development, therapeutic mechanisms, causal pathways
MeSH terms
Affect, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Models, Psychological, Psychotherapy, Self Concept, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review