Cited by 39Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCancer survivorship and care

Acceptability of a mindfulness intervention for depressive symptoms among African-American women in a community health center: A qualitative study

Burnett-Zeigler, Inger, Satyshur, Maureen D., Hong, Sunghyun, Wisner, Katherine L., Moskowitz, Judith·2019·Complementary Therapies in Medicine

Abstract

Introduction In this study we examined the acceptability and feasibility of a mindfulness based group intervention for socio-economically disadvantaged women in an urban community health center (M-Body).Method Women ages 18-65 with depressive symptoms who participated in an 8-week mindfulness based group intervention were invited to attend follow up focus groups about their experience. Inductive content analysis was used to identify themes from transcripts.Results All participants were African-American (N = 27). Participants had limited past experience with mindfulness. They reported benefits included anger management, increased control of thoughts, emotions and behaviors, enhanced awareness/focus and feeling calm and relaxed. Barriers to session attendance included transportation, employment, family responsibilities and child care. Participants suggested modifications such as providing the audio in multiple formats, increasing time spent doing yoga, modifying yoga postures and providing an orientation session. They stated that the content and delivery format of the group was acceptable.Discussion The mindfulness based intervention for depression was acceptable, reduced stress and improved coping and functioning among women in a community health center.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.05.012

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burnett-Zeigler, I., Satyshur, M. D., Hong, S., Wisner, K. L., & Moskowitz, J.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Complementary Therapies in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
45
Pages
19-24
ISSN
0965-2299 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2944005739
Cited by
39
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Complementary Therapies in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ K12HS023011)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, depressive symptoms, African American women, treatment acceptability, feasibility, community health centers, socioeconomic deprivation, barriers to attendance, yoga, anger management, coping, stress reduction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Black or African American, Community Health Centers, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Yoga, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review