Cited by 427Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingTreatment of Major Depression

The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): Clinician (IDS‐C) and Self‐Report (IDS‐SR) ratings of depressive symptoms

Rush, A. John, Carmody, Thomas, Reimitz, Paul‐Egbert·2000·International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

Abstract

This paper describes the rationale and methods entailed in developing the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS) in both clinician‐rated (IDS‐C) and self‐reported (IDS‐SR) formats. Psychometric features of the both the IDS‐C and IDS‐SR are presented. These scales are compared to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRS‐D) in the detection of symptom change in patients with major depressive (n = 184) or bipolar disorder (n = 141). The face validity and established psychometric features of the IDS‐C and IDS‐SR indicate that either may be useful in detecting symptom change, as well as in detecting residual symptoms in depressed patients. Further efforts to shorten each measure are indicated. Copyright © 2000 Whurr Publishers Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mpr.79

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rush, A. J., Carmody, T., & Reimitz, P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Organon (Netherlands) (NL)
Corresponding author
Rush, A. John
Venue
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-06
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
45-59
ISSN
  • 1049-8931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-0657
OpenAlex
W2090408573
Cited by
427
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, depressive symptoms, self-report scale, psychometric properties, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, residual depressive symptoms, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, scale development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review