CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 276

Differential Regulation of Germline mRNAs in Soma and Germ Cells by Zebrafish miR-430

Mishima, Yuichiro, Giraldez, Antonio J., Takeda, Yasuaki, Fujiwara, Toshinobu, Sakamoto, Hiroshi, Schier, Alexander F., Inoue, Kunio·2006·Current Biology
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.086
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.086

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. [1]1. Wylie, C. Germ cells Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2000; 10:410-413 Crossref Scopus (88) PubMed Google Scholar
  2. [2]2. Kobayashi, S. ∙ Yamada, M. ∙ Asaoka, M. ... Essential role of the posterior morphogen nanos for germline development in Drosophila Nature. 1996; 380:708-711 Crossref Scopus (264) PubMed Google Scholar
  3. [3]3. Subramaniam, K. ∙ Seydoux, G. nos-1 and nos-2, two genes related to Drosophila nanos, regulate primordial germ cell development and survival in Caenorhabditis elegans Development. 1999; 126:4861-4871 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  4. [4]4. Koprunner, M. ∙ Thisse, C. ∙ Thisse, B. ... A zebrafish nanos-related gene is essential for the development of primordial germ cells Genes Dev. 2001; 15:2877-2885 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  5. [5]5. Tsuda, M. ∙ Sasaoka, Y. ∙ Kiso, M. ... Conserved role of nanos proteins in germ cell development Science. 2003; 301:1239-1241 Crossref Scopus (494) PubMed Google Scholar
  6. [6]6. Gavis, E.R. ∙ Lehmann, R. Translational regulation of nanos by RNA localization Nature. 1994; 369:315-318 Crossref Scopus (252) PubMed Google Scholar
  7. [7]7. Bashirullah, A. ∙ Halsell, S.R. ∙ Cooperstock, R.L. ... Joint action of two RNA degradation pathways controls the timing of maternal transcript elimination at the midblastula transition in Drosophila melanogaster EMBO J. 1999; 18:2610-2620 Crossref Scopus (180) PubMed Google Scholar
  8. [8]8. D'Agostino, I. ∙ Merritt, C. ∙ Chen, P.L. ... Translational repression restricts expression of the C. elegans Nanos homolog NOS-2 to the embryonic germline Dev. Biol. 2006; 292:244-252 Crossref Scopus (62) PubMed Google Scholar
  9. [9]9. Giraldez, A.J. ∙ Cinalli, R.M. ∙ Glasner, M.E. ... MicroRNAs regulate brain morphogenesis in zebrafish Science. 2005; 308:833-838 Crossref Scopus (1113) PubMed Google Scholar
  10. [10]10. Hashimoto, Y. ∙ Maegawa, S. ∙ Nagai, T. ... Localized maternal factors are required for zebrafish germ cell formation Dev. Biol. 2004; 268:152-161 Crossref Scopus (121) PubMed Google Scholar
  11. [11]11. Theusch, E.V. ∙ Brown, K.J. ∙ Pelegri, F. Separate pathways of RNA recruitment lead to the compartmentalization of the zebrafish germ plasm Dev. Biol. 2006; 292:129-141 Crossref Scopus (73) PubMed Google Scholar
  12. [12]12. Blaser, H. ∙ Eisenbeiss, S. ∙ Neumann, M. ... Transition from non-motile behaviour to directed migration during early PGC development in zebrafish J. Cell Sci. 2005; 118:4027-4038 Crossref Scopus (144) PubMed Google Scholar
  13. [13]13. Richter, J.D. Cytoplasmic polyadenylation in development and beyond Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1999; 63:446-456 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  14. [14]14. Wilkie, G.S. ∙ Dickson, K.S. ∙ Gray, N.K. Regulation of mRNA translation by 5′- and 3′-UTR-binding factors Trends Biochem. Sci. 2003; 28:182-188 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (407) PubMed Google Scholar
  15. [15]15. de Moor, C.H. ∙ Meijer, H. ∙ Lissenden, S. Mechanisms of translational control by the 3′ UTR in development and differentiation Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005; 16:49-58 Crossref Scopus (296) PubMed Google Scholar
  16. [16]16. Wolke, U. ∙ Weidinger, G. ∙ Koprunner, M. ... Multiple levels of posttranscriptional control lead to germ line-specific gene expression in the zebrafish Curr. Biol. 2002; 12:289-294 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (112) PubMed Google Scholar
  17. [17]17. Schwartz, D.C. ∙ Parker, R. Mutations in translation initiation factors lead to increased rates of deadenylation and decapping of mRNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999; 19:5247-5256 Crossref Scopus (199) PubMed Google Scholar
  18. [18]18. Bergamini, G. ∙ Preiss, T. ∙ Hentze, M.W. Picornavirus IRESes and the poly(A) tail jointly promote cap-independent translation in a mammalian cell-free system RNA. 2000; 6:1781-1790 Crossref Scopus (172) PubMed Google Scholar
  19. [19]19. Giraldez, A.J. ∙ Mishima, Y. ∙ Rihel, J. ... Zebrafish MiR-430 promotes deadenylation and clearance of maternal mRNAs Science. 2006; 312:75-79 Crossref Scopus (1292) PubMed Google Scholar
  20. [20]20. Wu, L. ∙ Fan, J. ∙ Belasco, J.G. MicroRNAs direct rapid deadenylation of mRNA Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006; 103:4034-4039 Crossref Scopus (946) PubMed Google Scholar
  21. [21]21. Behm-Ansmant, I. ∙ Rehwinkel, J. ∙ Doerks, T. ... mRNA degradation by miRNAs and GW182 requires both CCR4:NOT deadenylase and DCP1:DCP2 decapping complexes Genes Dev. 2006; 20:1885-1898 Crossref Scopus (772) PubMed Google Scholar
  22. [22]22. Ambros, V. The functions of animal microRNAs Nature. 2004; 431:350-355 Crossref Scopus (9573) PubMed Google Scholar
  23. [23]23. Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function Cell. 2004; 116:281-297 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (31424) PubMed Google Scholar
  24. [24]24. Du, T. ∙ Zamore, P.D. microPrimer: The biogenesis and function of microRNA Development. 2005; 132:4645-4652 Crossref Scopus (700) PubMed Google Scholar
  25. [25]25. Brennecke, J. ∙ Stark, A. ∙ Russell, R.B. ... Principles of microRNA-target recognition PLoS Biol. 2005; 3:e85 Crossref Scopus (1917) PubMed Google Scholar
  26. [26]26. Doench, J.G. ∙ Sharp, P.A. Specificity of microRNA target selection in translational repression Genes Dev. 2004; 18:504-511 Crossref Scopus (1354) PubMed Google Scholar
  27. [27]27. Kloosterman, W.P. ∙ Wienholds, E. ∙ Ketting, R.F. ... Substrate requirements for let-7 function in the developing zebrafish embryo Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32:6284-6291 Crossref Scopus (199) PubMed Google Scholar
  28. [28]28. Lai, E.C. Micro RNAs are complementary to 3′ UTR sequence motifs that mediate negative post-transcriptional regulation Nat. Genet. 2002; 30:363-364 Crossref Scopus (1240) PubMed Google Scholar
  29. [29]29. Lim, L.P. ∙ Lau, N.C. ∙ Garrett-Engele, P. ... Microarray analysis shows that some microRNAs downregulate large numbers of target mRNAs Nature. 2005; 433:769-773 Crossref Scopus (4149) PubMed Google Scholar
  30. [30]30. Bagga, S. ∙ Bracht, J. ∙ Hunter, S. ... Regulation by let-7 and lin-4 miRNAs results in target mRNA degradation Cell. 2005; 122:553-563 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (1138) PubMed Google Scholar
  31. [31]31. Dahanukar, A. ∙ Walker, J.A. ∙ Wharton, R.P. Smaug, a novel RNA-binding protein that operates a translational switch in Drosophila Mol. Cell. 1999; 4:209-218 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (182) PubMed Google Scholar
  32. [32]32. Smibert, C.A. ∙ Lie, Y.S. ∙ Shillinglaw, W. ... Smaug, a novel and conserved protein, contributes to repression of nanos mRNA translation in vitro RNA. 1999; 5:1535-1547 Crossref Scopus (117) PubMed Google Scholar
  33. [33]33. Forrest, K.M. ∙ Clark, I.E. ∙ Jain, R.A. ... Temporal complexity within a translational control element in the nanos mRNA Development. 2004; 131:5849-5857 Crossref Scopus (55) PubMed Google Scholar
  34. [34]34. Kalifa, Y. ∙ Huang, T. ∙ Rosen, L.N. ... Glorund, a Drosophila hnRNP F/H Homolog, Is an Ovarian Repressor of nanos Translation Dev. Cell. 2006; 10:291-301 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (67) PubMed Google Scholar
  35. [35]35. Jeske, M. ∙ Meyer, S. ∙ Temme, C. ... Rapid ATP-dependent deadenylation of nanos mRNA in a cell-free system from Drosophila embryos J. Biol. Chem. 2006; 281:25124-25133 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (42) PubMed Google Scholar
  36. [36]36. Bhattacharyya, S.N. ∙ Habermacher, R. ∙ Martine, U. ... Relief of microRNA-mediated translational repression in human cells subjected to stress Cell. 2006; 125:1111-1124 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (1104) PubMed Google Scholar

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mishima, Y., Giraldez, A. J., Takeda, Y., Fujiwara, T., Sakamoto, H., Schier, A. F., & Inoue, K.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11
Volume
16
Issue
21
Pages
2135-2142
ISSN
0960-9822
DOI
10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.086
Cited by
276
References
2
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Asahi Glass Foundation
  • Human Frontier Science Program
  • National Institutes of Health
  • European Molecular Biology Organization
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review