Cited by 185Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationClimate Change Policy and Economics

Communicating sentiment and outlook reverses inaction against collective risks

Open access
Wang, Zhen, Jusup, Marko, Guo, Hao, Shi, Lei, Geček, Sunčana, Anand, Madhur, Perc, Matjaž, Bauch, Chris T. +3 more·2020·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Collective risks trigger social dilemmas that require balancing selfish interests and common good. One important example is mitigating climate change, wherein without sufficient investments, worldwide negative consequences become increasingly likely. To study the social aspects of this problem, we organized a game experiment that reveals how group size, communication, and behavioral type drive prosocial action. We find that communicating sentiment and outlook leads to more positive outcomes, even among culturally heterogeneous groups. Although genuine free riders remain unfazed by communication, prosocial players better endure accumulated investment deficits, and thus fight off inaction as the failure looms. This suggests that climate negotiations may achieve more by leveraging existing goodwill than persuading skeptics to act.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1922345117

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Z., Jusup, M., Guo, H., Shi, L., Geček, S., Anand, M., Perc, M., Bauch, C. T., Kurths, J., Boccaletti, S., & Schellnhuber, H. J.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
  • Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
  • Statistics and Mathematics College, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China;
  • Ruđer Bošković Institute (HR)
  • University of Guelph (CA)
  • China Medical University (TW)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
  • Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (RU)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Zhen
  • Jusup, Marko
  • Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2020-07-15
Volume
117
Issue
30
Pages
17650-17655
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3042961264
Cited by
185
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 1
FWCI
20.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Repository of the Ruđer Bošković Institute (Ruđer Bošković Institute) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RENATE (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RENATE (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31700393, 81961138010, 11931015, 11671348, U1803263)
  • Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS (J4-9302, P1-0403, J1-9112)
  • Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost (#IP-2018-01-3150-AqADAPT, IP-2018, IP-2018-01-3150, -2018-01-3150, IP-2018-01)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (3102019PJ006, U1803263, 81961138010)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
collective action, free-riding, climate change mitigation, social dilemmas, investment behavior, group size, behavioral types, cooperation, altruism
MeSH terms
Behavior, Communication, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review