Cited by 69Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyMorphological variations and asymmetryForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

Brain development is similar in Neanderthals and modern humans

Open access
Ponce de León, Marcia S., Bienvenu, Thibaut, Akazawa, Takeru, Zollikofer, Christoph P.E.·2016·Current Biology

Abstract

While the braincase of adult Neanderthals had a similar volume to that of modern humans from the same period, differences in endocranial shape suggest that brain morphology differed between modern humans and Neanderthals. When and how these differences arose during evolution and development is a topic of ongoing research, with potential implications for species-specific differences in brain and cognitive development, and in life history [1,2]. Earlier research suggested that Neanderthals followed an ancestral mode of brain development, similar to that of our closest living relatives, the chimpanzees [2-4]. Modern humans, by contrast, were suggested to follow a uniquely derived mode of brain development just after birth, giving rise to the characteristically globular shape of the adult human brain case [2,4,5]. Here, we re-examine this hypothesis using an extended sample of Neanderthal infants. We document endocranial development during the decisive first two years of postnatal life. The new data indicate that Neanderthals followed largely similar modes of endocranial development to modern humans. These findings challenge the notion that human brain and cognitive development after birth is uniquely derived [2,4].

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.022

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. S10. Zollikofer, C.P.E., and Ponce de León, M.S. (2002). Visualizing patterns of craniofacial shape variation in Homo sapiens. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 269, 801-807.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ponce de León, M. S., Bienvenu, T., Akazawa, T., & Zollikofer, C. P. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Kochi University of Technology (JP)
Corresponding author
Zollikofer, Christoph P.E.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
26
Issue
14
Pages
R665-R666
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2506386430
Cited by
69
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3
FWCI
45.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Keywords
Neanderthals, human brain development, braincase morphology, postnatal brain growth, human evolution, cognitive development, life history
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Humans, Skull, Neanderthals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review