Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 235

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multi-locus Analyses Reveal Four Giraffe Species Instead of One

Open access
Fennessy, Julian, Bidon, Tobias, Reuss, Friederike, Kumar, Vikas, Elkan, Paul, Nilsson, Maria A., Vamberger, Melita, Fritz, Uwe, Janke, Axel·2016·Current Biology
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.036
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.036

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Lydekker, 1904, On the subspecies of Giraffa camelopardalis, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 74, 202, 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1904.tb08288.x · DOI
  2. Brown, 2007, Extensive population genetic structure in the giraffe, BMC Biol., 5, 57, 10.1186/1741-7007-5-57 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bock, 2014, Mitochondrial sequences reveal a clear separation between Angolan and South African giraffe along a cryptic rift valley, BMC Evol. Biol., 14, 219, 10.1186/s12862-014-0219-7 · DOI
  4. Fennessy, 2013, Mitochondrial DNA analyses show that Zambia’s South Luangwa Valley giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis thornicrofti) are genetically isolated, Afr. J. Ecol., 51, 635, 10.1111/aje.12085 · DOI
  5. Evanno, 2005, Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study, Mol. Ecol., 14, 2611, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x · DOI · Paper page
  6. Gallus, 2015, A genome survey sequencing of the Java mouse deer (Tragulus javanicus) adds new aspects to the evolution of lineage specific retrotransposons in Ruminantia (Cetartiodactyla), Gene, 571, 271, 10.1016/j.gene.2015.06.064 · DOI
  7. Hassanin, 2012, Pattern and timing of diversification of Cetartiodactyla (Mammalia, Laurasiatheria), as revealed by a comprehensive analysis of mitochondrial genomes, C. R. Biol., 335, 32, 10.1016/j.crvi.2011.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Harper, 1940, The nomenclature and type localities of certain Old World mammals, J. Mammal., 21, 322, 10.2307/1374760 · DOI
  9. Lydekker, 1911, Two undescribed giraffes, Nature, 87, 484, 10.1038/087484c0 · doi:10.1038/087484c0
  10. Matschie, 1898, Einige anscheinend noch nicht beschriebene Säugetiere aus Afrika, Sitzungsber. Ges. Naturforsch. Freunde Berlin, 1898, 75
  11. De Queiroz, 2007, Species concepts and species delimitation, Syst. Biol., 56, 879, 10.1080/10635150701701083 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hassanin, 2007, Mitochondrial DNA variability in Giraffa camelopardalis: consequences for taxonomy, phylogeography and conservation of giraffes in West and central Africa, C. R. Biol., 330, 265, 10.1016/j.crvi.2007.02.008 · DOI
  13. Flanagan, 2016, Use of home range behaviour to assess establishment in translocated giraffes, Afr. J. Ecol., 10.1111/aje.12299 · DOI
  14. Baker, 2006, Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept, J. Mammal., 87, 643, 10.1644/06-MAMM-F-038R2.1 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Wernersson, 2005, Pigs in sequence space: a 0.66X coverage pig genome survey based on shotgun sequencing, BMC Genomics, 6, 70, 10.1186/1471-2164-6-70 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Kuramoto, 2015, Determining the Position of Storks on the Phylogenetic Tree of Waterbirds by Retroposon Insertion Analysis, Genome Biol. Evol., 7, 3180, 10.1093/gbe/evv213 · DOI
  17. Agaba, 2016, Giraffe genome sequence reveals clues to its unique morphology and physiology, Nat. Commun., 7, 11519, 10.1038/ncomms11519 · DOI
  18. Archibald, 2010, The sheep genome reference sequence: a work in progress, Anim. Genet., 41, 449, 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02100.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. Drummond, 2012, Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7, Mol. Biol. Evol., 29, 1969, 10.1093/molbev/mss075 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Darriba, 2012, jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing, Nat. Methods, 9, 772, 10.1038/nmeth.2109 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Stamatakis, 2014, RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies, Bioinformatics, 30, 1312, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Shimodaira, 2002, An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection, Syst. Biol., 51, 492, 10.1080/10635150290069913 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Shimodaira, 2001, CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection, Bioinformatics, 17, 1246, 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1246 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Dmitriev, 2008, Decoding of superimposed traces produced by direct sequencing of heterozygous indels, PLoS Comput. Biol., 4, e1000113, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000113 · DOI
  25. Mirarab, 2014, ASTRAL: genome-scale coalescent-based species tree estimation, Bioinformatics, 30, i541, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu462 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Yang, 2007, PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood, Mol. Biol. Evol., 24, 1586, 10.1093/molbev/msm088 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Librado, 2009, DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data, Bioinformatics, 25, 1451, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Clement, 2000, TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies, Mol. Ecol., 9, 1657, 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x · DOI · Paper page
  29. Pritchard, 2000, Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data, Genetics, 155, 945, 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Jakobsson, 2007, CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure, Bioinformatics, 23, 1801, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm233 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Earl, 2011, STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method, Conserv. Genet. Resour., 4, 359, 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Jombart, 2008, adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers, Bioinformatics, 24, 1403, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Yang, 2015, The BPP program for species tree estimation and species delimitation, Curr. Zool., 61, 5, 10.1093/czoolo/61.5.854 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Excoffier, 2010, Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows, Mol. Ecol. Resour., 10, 564, 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x · DOI · Paper page
  35. Luo, 2012, SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler, Gigascience, 1, 18, 10.1186/2047-217X-1-18 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Li, 2006, Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences, Bioinformatics, 22, 1658, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Kofler, 2007, SciRoKo: a new tool for whole genome microsatellite search and investigation, Bioinformatics, 23, 1683, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm157 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Rozen, 2000, Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers, Methods Mol. Biol., 132, 365

Cited by

See all 235

Metadata

Authors
Fennessy, J., Bidon, T., Reuss, F., Kumar, V., Elkan, P., Nilsson, M. A., Vamberger, M., Fritz, U., & Janke, A.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
26
Issue
18
Pages
2543-2549
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.036
OpenAlex
W2519907207
Cited by
235
References
3
FWCI
18.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
Funders
  • LOEWE
  • Leibniz Association
  • Giraffe Conservation Foundation
  • Leiden Conservation Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-locus Analyses Reveal Four Giraffe Species Instead of One. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.036
The paper
Fennessy, J., Bidon, T., Reuss, F., Kumar, V., Elkan, P., Nilsson, M. A., Vamberger, M., Fritz, U., & Janke, A. (2016). Multi-locus Analyses Reveal Four Giraffe Species Instead of One. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.036

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.