Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,204

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: Imaging acquisition across 21 sites

Open access
Casey, B.J., Cannonier, Tariq, Conley, May I., Cohen, Alexandra O., Barch, Deanna M., Heitzeg, Mary M., Soules, Mary E., Teslovich, Theresa, Dellarco, Danielle V., Garavan, Hugh, Orr, Catherine A., Wager, Tor D., Banich, Marie T., Speer, Nicole K., Sutherland, Matthew T., Riedel, Michael C., Dick, Anthony S., Bjork, James M., Thomas, Kathleen M., Chaarani, Bader, Mejia, Margie H., Hagler, Donald J., Daniela Cornejo, M., Sicat, Chelsea S., Harms, Michael P., Dosenbach, Nico U.F., Rosenberg, Monica, Earl, Eric, Bartsch, Hauke, Watts, Richard, Polimeni, Jonathan R., Kuperman, Joshua M., Fair, Damien A., Dale, Anders M.·2018·Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

The ABCD study is recruiting and following the brain development and health of over 10,000 9-10 year olds through adolescence. The imaging component of the study was developed by the ABCD Data Analysis and Informatics Center (DAIC) and the ABCD Imaging Acquisition Workgroup. Imaging methods and assessments were selected, optimized and harmonized across all 21 sites to measure brain structure and function relevant to adolescent development and addiction. This article provides an overview of the imaging procedures of the ABCD study, the basis for their selection and preliminary quality assurance and results that provide evidence for the feasibility and age-appropriateness of procedures and generalizability of findings to the existent literature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.03.001

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 2,204

Metadata

Authors
Casey, B. J., Cannonier, T., Conley, M. I., Cohen, A. O., Barch, D. M., Heitzeg, M. M., Soules, M. E., Teslovich, T., Dellarco, D. V., Garavan, H., Orr, C. A., Wager, T. D., Banich, M. T., Speer, N. K., Sutherland, M. T., Riedel, M. C., Dick, A. S., Bjork, J. M., Thomas, K. M., Chaarani, B., Mejia, M. H., Hagler, D. J., Daniela Cornejo, M., Sicat, C. S., Harms, M. P., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Rosenberg, M., Earl, E., Bartsch, H., Watts, R., Polimeni, J. R., Kuperman, J. M., Fair, D. A., & Dale, A. M.
Venue
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
32
Pages
43-54
ISSN
1878-9293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2789530810
Cited by
2,204
References
15
FWCI
72.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.