Cited by 254Gut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disordersProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Altered molecular signature of intestinal microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome patients compared with healthy controls: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Liu, Hai-Ning, Wu, Hao, Chen, Yu-Zhuo, Chen, Yan-Jie, Shen, Xi-Zhong, Liu, Tao-Tao·2017·Digestive and Liver Disease

Abstract

Background Many studies have reported significant changes in intestinal microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients based on quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Aims We aimed to review the alterations in intestinal microbiota. Methods An online search up to June 9, 2016, was conducted. This systematic review and meta-analysis included differential expression of intestinal microbiota in patients with IBS versus healthy controls (HCs) and subgroup analysis. We assessed the quality of the included studies using an original assessment tool. Results A total of 13 articles involving 360 IBS patients and 268 healthy controls were included. The quality assessment scores for these articles ranged from 5 to 8. Significant differences in expression in IBS patients were observed for Lactobacillus (SMD=-0.85, P<0.001, I 2=28%), Bifidobacterium (SMD=-1.17, P<0.001, I 2=79.3%), and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (SMD=-1.05, P<0.001, I 2=0.0%) but not Bacteroides-Prevotella group, Escherichia coli or other genera or species. Subgroup analysis showed that diarrhea-predominant IBS patients had significantly different expression of Lactobacillus (SMD=-1.81, P<0.001) and Bifidobacterium (SMD=-1.45, P<0.001). Conclusion Down-regulation of bacterial colonization including Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium and F. prausnitzii was observed in IBS patients, particularly in diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D). Microbiota changes participate in the pathogenesis of IBS and may underlie the efficacy of probiotic supplements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dld.2017.01.142

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, H.-N., Wu, H., Chen, Y.-Z., Chen, Y.-J., Shen, X.-Z., & Liu, T.-T.
Affiliations
Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Hai-Ning
  • Wu, Hao
  • Chen, Yu-Zhuo
Venue
Digestive and Liver Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
331-337
ISSN
1590-8658 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2574577991
Cited by
254
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Digestive and Liver Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, gut microbiota, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, bacterial colonization, probiotics, gut dysbiosis
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Bacteria, Diarrhea, DNA, Bacterial, Feces, Humans, Down-Regulation, Probiotics, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review