Cited by 75Gut microbiota and healthNuts composition and effectsGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Nuts and their effect on gut microbiota, gut function and symptoms in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Open access
Creedon, Alice C., Hung, Estella S., Berry, Sarah E., Whelan, Kevin·2020·Nutrients

Abstract

Nuts contain fibre, unsaturated fatty acids and polyphenols that may impact the composition of the gut microbiota and overall gut health. This study aimed to assess the impact of nuts on gut microbiota, gut function and gut symptoms via a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in healthy adults. Eligible RCTs were identified by systematic searches of five electronic databases, hand searching of conference abstracts, clinical trials databases, back-searching reference lists and contact with key stakeholders. Eligible studies were RCTs administering tree nuts or peanuts in comparison to control, measuring any outcome related to faecal microbiota, function or symptoms. Two reviewers independently screened papers, performed data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Outcome data were synthesised as weighted mean difference (WMD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) using a random effects model. This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019138169). Eight studies reporting nine RCTs were included, investigating almonds (n = 5), walnuts (n = 3) and pistachios (n = 1). Nut consumption significantly increased Clostridium (SMD: 0.40; 95% CI, 0.10, 0.71; p = 0.01), Dialister (SMD: 0.44; 95% CI, 0.13, 0.75; p = 0.005), Lachnospira (SMD: 0.33; 95% CI, 0.02, 0.64; p = 0.03) and Roseburia (SMD: 0.36; 95% CI, 0.10, 0.62; p = 0.006), and significantly decreased Parabacteroides (SMD: −0.31; 95% CI, −0.62, −0.00; p = 0.05). There was no effect of nuts on bacterial phyla, diversity or stool output. Further parallel design RCTs, powered to detect changes in faecal microbiota and incorporating functional and clinical outcomes, are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu12082347

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials concluded that nut consumption shapes the microbiota at the genus level (e.g., increases in Clostridium, Dialister, Roseburia, and Lachnospira, decrease in Parabacteroides); however, the specific effects depend on the type and amount of nut consumed and the duration of the intervention.

    “A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effect of nut consumption on gut microbiota concluded that nut consumption shapes the microbiota at the genus level (e.g., increases in Clostridium, Dialister, Roseburia, and Lachnospira, decrease in Parabacteroides); however, the specific effects depend on the type and amount of nut consumed and the duration of”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Creedon, A. C., Hung, E. S., Berry, S. E., & Whelan, K.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Whelan, Kevin
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-08-06
Volume
12
Issue
8
Pages
2347
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3047358851
Cited by
75
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nuts composition and effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
nuts, gut microbiota, fecal microbiota, gastrointestinal function, gastrointestinal symptoms, tree nuts, groundnut, almond, Juglans regia, pistachio, Clostridium, Dialister, Lachnospira, Roseburia, Parabacteroides, dietary intervention, healthy adults
MeSH terms
Prunus dulcis, Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Adult, Eating, Feces, Female, Humans, Intestinal Diseases, Intestines, Male, Nuts, Arachis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Pistacia, Juglans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review