Cited by 164Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDigital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enduring effects of a computer-assisted training program for cognitive behavioral therapy: A 6-month follow-up of CBT4CBT

Open access

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the durability of effects of a computer-assisted version of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) as treatment for substance dependence through a 6-month follow-up.Methods Following a randomized clinical trial in which 73 individuals seeking outpatient treatment for substance dependence in an outpatient community setting were randomized to either standard treatment-as-usual (TAU) or TAU with 8 weeks of biweekly access to computer-based training for CBT (CBT4CBT), participants were interviewed 1, 3, and 6 months after the termination of study treatments.Results Sixty of the 73 participants were reached for follow-up (82%); follow-up rates and availability of data were comparable across treatment conditions. Random regression analyses of use across time indicated significant differences between groups, such that those assigned to TAU increased their drug use across time while those assigned to CBT4CBT tended to improve slightly. The durability of the CBT4CBT effect remained even after controlling for treatment retention, treatment substance use outcomes, and exposure to other treatment during the follow-up period.Conclusions Computerized CBT4CBT appears to have both short-term and enduring effects on drug use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.09.015

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Carroll, K. M., Ball, S. A., Martino, S., Nich, C., Babuscio, T. A., & Rounsaville, B. J.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Carroll, Kathleen M.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
100
Issue
1-2
Pages
178-181
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094369744
Cited by
164
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K05-DA00457, K05DA000089, R37DA015969, K05DA00089, P50DA009241, K05DA000457, R01DA019078, R01DA015969, P50-DA-0-9241)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
substance dependence, drug use, treatment retention, treatment durability, outpatient addiction treatment, computer-based training
MeSH terms
Ambulatory Care, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Time Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review