The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Behavioral assessment of impulsivity in pathological gamblers with and without substance use disorder histories versus healthy controls
Open accessAbstract
Pathological gamblers (PGs) may have high levels of impulsivity, and a correlation between substance use disorders (SUDs) and impulsivity is well established. However, only a handful of studies have attempted to assess impulsivity and other impulse-spectrum traits (e.g., sensation seeking) using a variety of behavioral and self-report measures in PGs and few examined the independent impact of SUDs. We compared 30 PGs without SUD histories, 31 PGs with SUD histories and 40 control participants on self-reported impulsivity, delayed discounting, attention/memory, response inhibition, risk taking, sensation seeking and distress tolerance measures. PGs, regardless of SUD history, discounted delayed rewards at greater rates than controls. PGs also reported acting on the spur of the moment, experienced trouble planning and thinking carefully, and noted greater attention difficulties than controls. PGs with SUD took greater risks on a risk-taking task than did PGs without SUD histories, but the two groups did not differ on any other measures of impulsivity. We conclude that PGs are more impulsive than non-problem gamblers in fairly specific ways, but PGs with and without SUD histories differ on few measures. More research should focus on specific ways in which PGs exhibit impulsivity to better address impulsive behaviors in treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Further, studies reveal that PGs are generally more impulsive than non-PGs (Ledgerwood, Alessi, Phoenix, & Petry, 2009; Petry, 2001; Steel & Blaszczynski, 1998; Vitaro, Arseneault, & Tremblay, 1999).”
From Subtyping Pathological Gamblers Based on Impulsivity, Depression, and Anxiety (2010) · cites this paper as Ledgerwood, Alessi, Phoenix, & Petry, 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2022) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787 · Cited by 23,476
Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders : SCID-I : clinical version : scoresheet
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1997) · American Psychiatric Press eBooks · Cited by 3,101
Sensation Seeking : Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal
Zuckerman, M. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,706
Paced Auditory Serial-Addition Task: A Measure of Recovery from Concussion
Gronwall, D. M. A. (1977) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1977.44.2.367 · Cited by 2,395 · cited 1×
“The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT; Brown et al., 2002; Gronwall, 1977) is a mental arithmetic task presented in three levels of increasing duration and difficulty and was used as a distress tolerance task.”
Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The balloon analogue risk task (BART)
Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., Strong, D. R., & Brown, R. A. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.8.2.75 · Cited by 2,336
Sensation seeking. Beyond the optimal level of arousal
Eysenck, H. J. (1980) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(80)90044-6 · Cited by 2,296
Evenden, J. L. (1999) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/pl00005481 · Cited by 2,044 · cited 1×
“There are several different ways of operationalizing impulsivity (Evenden, 1999).”
A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling
Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00015.x · Cited by 2,013 · cited 1×
“Further, some PGs appear to use gambling as a way to escape from negative emotional experiences (Blaszczynski and Nower, 2002; Ledgerwood and Petry, 2006a).”
On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: A model and a method.
Logan, G. D., Cowan, W. B., & Davis, K. A. (1984) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.2.276 · Cited by 1,542
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control
Bari, A., & Robbins, T. W. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.06.005 · Cited by 1,921
Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis
MacKillop, J., Amlung, M. T., Few, L. R., Ray, L. A., Sweet, L. H., & Munafò, M. R. (2011) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2229-0 · Cited by 1,021
“…choice task $1,000 k MacKillop et al. 2006 Gambling Potential pathological gamblers vs. controls No 37 vs. 34 Multi-item choice task $1,000 k Ledgerwood et al. 2009 Gambling Pathological gamblers vs. controls Yes 30 vs. 41 Multi-item choice task $1,000 AUC Dixon et al. 2003 Gambling…”
BackgroundInfluentialBickel, W. K., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Mueller, E. T., Koffarnus, M. N., & Gatchalian, K. M. (2012) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.02.004 · Cited by 604
“Ledgerwood et al. (2009) replicated Petry’s (2001b) observed difference between the discounting rates of pathological gamblers and controls, but Ledgerwood et al. (2009) did not observe a difference between gamblers with and without a substance abuse disorder.”
BackgroundCyders, M. A., & Coskunpinar, A. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.06.001 · Cited by 580
Food reinforcement, delay discounting and obesity
Epstein, L. H., Salvy, S. J., Carr, K. A., Dearing, K. K., & Bickel, W. K. (2010) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.04.029 · Cited by 334
“Behavioral choice theory has primarily focused on problems of drug abuse [1,2] and gambling [3,4] but has beenextended to other healthbehaviors, suchaseating, physical activity and obesity [5,6].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Ledgerwood, D. M., Alessi, S. M., Phoenix, N., & Petry, N. M.
- Affiliations
- UConn Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ledgerwood, David M.
- Venue
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 89-96
- ISSN
- 0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2743796
- OpenAlex
- W2039731862
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 7.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH060417)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- gambling addiction, impulsivity, delay discounting, sensation seeking, risk-taking, response inhibition, attention and memory, distress tolerance
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Education, Employment, Ethnicity, Female, Gambling, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Income, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reward, Risk-Taking, Socioeconomic Factors, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
