Cited by 462Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Substance abuse, pathological gambling, and impulsiveness

Petry, Nancy M·2001·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

This study evaluated behavioral and self-report indices of impulsiveness in pathological gambling substance abusers (n=27), non-pathological gambling substance abusers (n=63), and non-pathological gambling/non-substance abusing controls (n=21). The Bechara card task measured preferences for decks of cards that ranged in magnitude and probability of delayed and immediate rewards and punishers. The Stanford Time Perception Inventory (STPI) assessed orientation to the future, the Zuckerman Sensation Seeking Scale evaluated sensation seeking, and the Eysenck and Barratt scales measured impulsivity. A Principal Components analysis revealed that these personality measures comprised three distinct measures of impulsivity: impulse control, novelty seeking and time orientation. Linear contrast analyses revealed that substance abuse and pathological gambling resulted in additive effects on the impulse control and time orientation factors, but not on the novelty-seeking scale. Performance on the card task did not correlate with any of the three factors derived from the personality scale scores, but the presence of both substance abuse and pathological gambling had an additive effect on preferences for decks containing greater immediate gains but resulting in large punishers and overall net losses. These results provide further evidence of an association among substance abuse, pathological gambling, and impulsivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0376-8716(00)00188-5

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pathological gamblers are generally more impulsive than non-pathological gamblers.

    “Further, studies reveal that PGs are generally more impulsive than non-PGs (Ledgerwood, Alessi, Phoenix, & Petry, 2009; Petry, 2001; Steel & Blaszczynski, 1998; Vitaro, Arseneault, & Tremblay, 1999).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petry, N. M.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Petry, Nancy M
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-06
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
29-38
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095265338
Cited by
462
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 35
FWCI
20.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50aa003510-27)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (P50- AA03510)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH060417)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01-DA05862, P50DA009241, R29DA012056)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR006192)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
substance abuse, gambling addiction, impulsivity, impulse control, novelty seeking, time orientation, sensation seeking, Zuckerman Sensation Seeking Scale, punishers
MeSH terms
Adult, Exploratory Behavior, Gambling, Humans, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Male, Personality Inventory, Psychological Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Time Perception, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review