Cited by 15Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and Interventions

Brief psycho-education affects circadian variability in nicotine craving during cessation

Nosen, Elizabeth, Woody, Sheila R.·2013·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background Nicotine cravings are a key target of smoking cessation interventions. Cravings demonstrate circadian variation during abstinence, often peaking during the morning and evening hours. Although some research has also shown diurnal variation in the efficacy of nicotine replacement medications, little research has examined how brief psychosocial interventions affect temporal patterns of craving during abstinence. The present study examined the impact of two brief psycho-education interventions on circadian variations in cravings during a 24-h period.Method 176 adult smokers interested in quitting participated in two lab sessions. During the first session, participants received (a) mindfulness psycho-education that encouraged acceptance of cravings as a normal, tolerable part of quitting that people should not expect to perfectly control, (b) standard cessation psycho-education, or (c) no psycho-education. Half the sample initiated a cessation attempt the following day. Dependent variables were assessed using ecological momentary assessment (24-h of monitoring, immediately after first lab session) and questionnaires four days later.Results Partially consistent with hypotheses, both forms of psycho-education were associated with differential diurnal variation in cravings during cessation. Relative to those receiving no psycho-education, standard smoking cessation psycho-education decreased morning cravings. Psycho-education encouraging acceptance of cravings was associated with lower craving in both the morning and evening, albeit only among successfully abstinent smokers.Conclusions Results demonstrate that brief non-pharmacological interventions can affect circadian craving patterns during smoking cessation. Further investigation of mechanisms of change and of the impact of psycho-education on cessation outcomes is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.02.017

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nosen, E., & Woody, S. R.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Nosen, Elizabeth
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
132
Issue
1-2
Pages
283-289
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966955990
Cited by
15
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
nicotine craving, smoking cessation, circadian variation, diurnal variation, psychoeducation, mindfulness, nicotine replacement therapy, non-pharmacological treatment, abstinence, ecological momentary assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Carbon Monoxide, Circadian Rhythm, Cotinine, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Education as Topic, Smoking, Smoking Cessation, Treatment Outcome, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review