Cited by 97Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMental Health Research TopicsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Associations Between Mindfulness and Mental Health Outcomes: a Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment Research

Open access
Enkema, Matthew C., McClain, Lauren, Bird, Elizabeth R., Halvorson, Max A., Larimer, Mary E.·2020·Mindfulness

Abstract

Objectives Psychological science has taken up investigations of the effectiveness of mindfulness-based programs (MBPs) and mechanisms through which people benefit from mindfulness. Reliable and valid psychometric tools are essential components of psychological science, and efforts have been made to produce tools for the accurate measurement of mindfulness as a construct. However, trait measurement methods, which are commonly used, may not adequately assess mindfulness and mental health outcomes in a way that allows for mechanisms to be adequately tested. Intensive longitudinal assessment methods sample behavior and experience multiple times over a brief period of several days or weeks, and may be more appropriate methods for testing mechanisms of action. We provide a systematic review of published, peer-reviewed studies that used intensive longitudinal methods to investigate the effects of mindfulness on mental health outcomes.Methods Articles were included in the systematic review if mindfulness measures and/or mindfulness interventions were a part of the study design and if intensive longitudinal methods were used to assess mindfulness or mental health outcomes.Results Findings consistently demonstrated a positive association between mindfulness and mental health. Only two studies collected both trait and state measurements of either mindfulness or mental health outcomes, and results indicated that EMA produced larger effect sizes between mindfulness and mental health outcomes.Conclusions Theorized associations between mindfulness and mental health are supported by the current EMA literature. Intensive longitudinal methods may produce more consistent and reliable results through increased sensitivity and ecological validity in that they examine the momentary relationships between mindfulness and mental health outcomes. Thus, intensive longitudinal assessment may be a more appropriate method for investigating hypothesized mechanisms of action in MBPs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-020-01442-2

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preliminary evidence suggests sets of baseline characteristics subjected to machine learning can provide treatment recommendations, such as choosing between maintenance antidepressant and MBCT.

    “Although, work predicting treatment response using machine learning is just beginning in mindfulness research, preliminary evidence suggests that sets of baseline characteristics subjected to machine learning can provide treatment recommendations, such as choosing between maintenance antidepressant and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy132.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, & Toney L (2006). Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27– 45. 10.1177/1073191105283504 16443717 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Enkema, M. C., McClain, L., Bird, E. R., Halvorson, M. A., & Larimer, M. E.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Enkema, Matthew C.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2020-07-15
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
2455-2469
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W3042264969
Cited by
97
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (F31DA042503)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (T32AA007455, F31AA027118)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
mental health outcomes, mindfulness-based interventions, ecological momentary assessment, intensive longitudinal methods, mechanism of action, mindfulness measurement, ecological validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review