Cited by 47Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Association between problematic alcohol use and reactivity to uncertain threat in two independent samples

Open access
Gorka, Stephanie M., Lieberman, Lynne, Phan, K. Luan, Shankman, Stewart A.·2016·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background Recent laboratory studies have shown that acute alcohol intoxication selectively and effectively dampens aversive responding to uncertain threat. An emerging hypothesis is that individuals who exhibit heightened reactivity to uncertain threat may be especially motivated to use alcohol to dampen their distress, setting the stage for negative reinforcement processes to drive excessive alcohol use. However, no study to date has directly examined whether current problematic drinkers exhibit heightened reactivity to uncertain threat as would be expected. Methods The present study was therefore designed to examine the association between current problematic alcohol use and reactivity to uncertain threat during sobriety in two, independent samples. In Study 1 (n=221) and Study 2 (n=74), adult participants completed the same well-validated threat-of-shock task which separately probes responses to temporally predictable and unpredictable threat. Startle potentiation was measured as an index of aversive responding. Problematic alcohol use was defined as number of binge episodes within the past 30days in Study 1 and total scores on a self-report measure of hazardous drinking in Study 2. Results As hypothesized, across both studies greater levels of problematic drinking were associated with greater startle potentiation to unpredictable threat. In Study 2, hazardous drinking scores were also positively associated with startle potentiation to predictable threat. Conclusions The findings are notably consistent with the notion that heightened reactivity to uncertain threat is an important individual difference factor associated with the onset and/or maintenance of problematic drinking behaviors and may therefore be a novel prevention and intervention target.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.04.034

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intolerance of uncertainty is a key driver of problematic alcohol drinking.

    “Intolerance of uncertainty is a key driver of problematic alcohol drinking (Gorka et al. 2016).”

    From Decoding the bidirectional links between alcohol misuse and aggression: toward a unified translational framework (2026) · cites this paper as Gorka et al. 2016

    The Discussion reports that problematic drinking was associated with greater reactivity to uncertain threat in two samples and says the findings converge with literature suggesting intolerance of uncertainty underlies motivation to use drugs. But this study measured threat reactivity, not intolerance of uncertainty, and an association does not establish that intolerance is a key driver of problematic drinking. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Babor TF De La Fuente JR Saunders J Grant M AUDIT: The Alcohol Use Identification Test. Guidelines For Use In Primary Healthcare 1989 Geneva, Switzerland World Health Organization

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gorka, S. M., Lieberman, L., Phan, K. L., & Shankman, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Gorka, Stephanie M.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
164
Pages
89-96
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2345349049
Cited by
47
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2
FWCI
6.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH101497, R01MH098093)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (F31AA22273)
  • University of Illinois at Chicago (UL1RR029879)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
alcohol abuse, threat reactivity, startle potentiation, negative reinforcement, binge drinking, hazardous drinking, individual differences, alcohol use disorder prevention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Alcoholic Intoxication, Alcoholism, Mental Disorders, Electroshock, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Reflex, Startle, Statistics as Topic, Temperance, Comorbidity, Uncertainty, Young Adult, Binge Drinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review