Cited by 955Technology Adoption and User BehaviourInnovation Diffusion and ForecastingGender and Technology in Education

Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet

Open access
Hong, SeJoon, Thong, James Y.L., Tam, Kar Yan·2006·Decision Support Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dss.2006.03.009

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • T-O-E framework has robust empirical support in the IS field more than other adoption frameworks such as TAM, IDT, TRA, SM, and TPB.

    “T-O-E framework is more holistic and size and industry friendly (Wen & Chen, 2010), has robust empirical support in IS field more than other adoption frameworks (e.g.TAM, IDT, TRA, SM, and TPB) (Henriksen, 2006;Hong, Thong, & Tam, 2006;Kuan & Chau, 2001;Yoon & George, 2013;Zheng, Yen, & Tarn, 2011;Zhu, Kraemer, & Xu, 2003) and meets the contemporary scholarly demand (Barrett, Grant, & Wailes, 2006”

    From Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution (2016) · cites this paper as Hong, Thong, & Tam, 2006

  • T-O-E framework earns substantial theoretical and empirical supports and validated inventory of psychometric measurements; hence it is more widely used in the IS domain at the organizational level than alternative models.

    “T-O-E framework earns substantial theoretical and empirical supports (see Eze et al., 2013;Henriksen, 2006;Hong et al., 2006;Kuan & Chau, 2001;Yoon & George, 2013;Zheng et al., 2011;Zhu & Kraemer, 2005;Zhu et al., 2003) as well as validated inventory of psychometric measurements; and hence, it is more widely used in IS domain at the organizational level than alternative models (Gangwar et al., 201”

    From Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution (2016) · cites this paper as Hong et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hong, S., Thong, J. Y. L., & Tam, K. Y.
Affiliations
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Venue
Decision Support Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-12
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
1819-1834
ISSN
0167-9236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100025715
Cited by
955
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 62
FWCI
38.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Decision Support Systems (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
mobile internet, expectation-confirmation model, technology acceptance model, hybrid model, model comparison, information technology adoption, model fit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review