Cited by 1,441Technology Adoption and User BehaviourCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance

Bhattacherjee, Anol·2001·Decision Support Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0167-9236(01)00111-7

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhattacherjee, A.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Bhattacherjee, Anol
Venue
Decision Support Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-12
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
201-214
ISSN
0167-9236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103356704
Cited by
1,441
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 80
FWCI
24.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Decision Support Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
e-commerce, continuance intention, B2C e-commerce, online brokerage, customer satisfaction, perceived usefulness, expectation confirmation, customer relationship management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review