Cited by 60Delphi Technique in ResearchCircadian rhythm and melatoninOcular and Laser Science Research

ENLIGHT: A consensus checklist for reporting laboratory-based studies on the non-visual effects of light in humans

Open access
Spitschan, Manuel, Kervezee, Laura, Lok, Renske, McGlashan, Elise, Najjar, Raymond P., Allen, Annette E., Andersen, Marilyne, Bará, Salvador +55 more·2023·eBioMedicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on reporting light characteristics in studies investigating non-visual responses to light. This project aimed to develop a reporting checklist for laboratory-based investigations on the impact of light on non-visual physiology. METHODS: A four-step modified Delphi process (three questionnaire-based feedback rounds and one face-to-face group discussion) involving international experts was conducted to reach consensus on the items to be included in the checklist. Following the consensus process, the resulting checklist was tested in a pilot phase with independent experts. FINDINGS: An initial list of 61 items related to reporting light-based interventions was condensed to a final checklist containing 25 items, based upon consensus among experts (final n = 60). Nine items were deemed necessary to report regardless of research question or context. A description of each item is provided in the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration (E&E) document. The independent pilot testing phase led to minor textual clarifications in the checklist and E&E document. INTERPRETATION: The ENLIGHT Checklist is the first consensus-based checklist for documenting and reporting ocular light-based interventions for human studies. The implementation of the checklist will enhance the impact of light-based research by ensuring comprehensive documentation, enhancing reproducibility, and enabling data aggregation across studies. FUNDING: Network of European Institutes for Advanced Study (NETIAS) Constructive Advanced Thinking (CAT) programme; Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship (Wellcome Trust, 204686/Z/16/Z); Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development VENI fellowship (2020-09150161910128); U.S. Department of Defense Grant (W81XWH-16-1-0223); National University of Singapore (NUHSRO/2022/038/Startup/08); and National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF2022-THE004-0002).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104889

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spitschan, M., Kervezee, L., Lok, R., McGlashan, E., Najjar, R. P., Allen, A. E., Andersen, M., Bará, S., Blattner, P., Blume, C., Boivin, D. B., Bonmatí-Carrión, M.-Á., Broszio, K., Brown, T. M., Chellappa, S. L., Duffy, J. F., Eto, T., Flynn-Evans, E., Fotios, S., Gabel, V., Garbazza, C., Glickman, G., Gordijn, M. C., Hanifin, J. P., Hartstein, L., Herf, M., Higuchi, S., Hilditch, C. J., Houser, K. W., Hurlbert, A., LeBourgeois, M. K., Lockley, S., Lucas, R., Moreno, C. R. C., Münch, M., Mure, L. S., Peirson, S., Rahman, S., Revell, V. L., Rodriguez, R. G., Roecklein, K., Rukmini, A. V., Sammarco, J., Santhi, N., Schlangen, L. J. M., Schöllhorn, I., Sharkey, K. M., Skene, D. J., Sletten, T. L., Smolders, K. C. H. J., Stefani, O., Stone, J. E., Teikari, P., Terman, M., Quoc, K. T., Tsubota, K., Udovicic, L., Vandewalle, G., Veitch, J. A., CélineVetter, Wu, L. M., Zauner, J., & Zeitzer, J.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
  • Spitschan, Manuel
  • Kervezee, Laura
  • Lok, Renske
  • McGlashan, Elise
  • Najjar, Raymond P.
Venue
eBioMedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
98
Pages
104889
ISSN
2352-3964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389280561
Cited by
60
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 1
FWCI
25.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EBioMedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Opin vísindi (Opin vísindi) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (204686/Z/16/Z)
  • National Research Foundation (NRF2022-THE004-0002)
  • Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (2020\u201309150161910128)
  • Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-16-1-0223, NUHSRO/2022/038/Startup/08)
  • National University of Singapore
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular and Laser Science Research
Keywords
non-visual effects of light, reporting checklist, light characteristics, reproducibility, data aggregation, expert consensus
MeSH terms
Humans, Research Design, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Resin Cements, Consensus, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review