Cited by 163Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related FatigueImpact of Light on Environment and Health

Individual differences in light sensitivity affect sleep and circadian rhythms

Open access
Chellappa, Sarah L·2021·Sleep

Abstract

Artificial lighting is omnipresent in contemporary society with disruptive consequences for human sleep and circadian rhythms because of overexposure to light, particularly in the evening/night hours. Recent evidence shows large individual variations in circadian photosensitivity, such as melatonin suppression, due to artificial light exposure. Despite the emerging body of research indicating that the effects of light on sleep and circadian rhythms vary dramatically across individuals, recommendations for appropriate light exposure in real-life settings rarely consider such individual effects. This review addresses recently identified links among individual traits, for example, age, sex, chronotype, genetic haplotypes, and the effects of evening/night light on sleep and circadian hallmarks, based on human laboratory and field studies. Target biological mechanisms for individual differences in light sensitivity include differences occurring within the retina and downstream, such as the central circadian clock. This review also highlights that there are wide gaps of uncertainty, despite the growing awareness that individual differences shape the effects of evening/night light on sleep and circadian physiology. These include (1) why do certain individual traits differentially affect the influence of light on sleep and circadian rhythms; (2) what is the translational value of individual differences in light sensitivity in populations typically exposed to light at night, such as night shift workers; and (3) what is the magnitude of individual differences in light sensitivity in population-based studies? Collectively, the current findings provide strong support for considering individual differences when defining optimal lighting specifications, thus allowing for personalized lighting solutions that promote quality of life and health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/zsaa214

Cites

129 of 129 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large interindividual differences exist in susceptibility to evening light exposure, with some subjects responding to minimal doses and others almost immune.

    “Another issue, which is getting increasingly more attention, is that there are large interindividual differences in terms of susceptibility to evening light exposure [67], with some subjects already responding to minimal doses of short-wavelength light and others being almost “immune” to evening light exposure.”

    From Preliminary Results: The Impact of Smartphone Use and Short-Wavelength Light during the Evening on Circadian Rhythm, Sleep and Alertness (2021) · cites this paper as [67]

    The passage on moderate evening light (section and page unavailable) reports a 50-fold range in sensitivity: some participants had substantial melatonin suppression at about 10 lx, while one needed about 400 lx for a comparable response. The review also describes low sensitivity as producing minimal, if any, suppression. Those passages support the large individual differences, but the low-dose finding concerns polychromatic light, not specifically short-wavelength light. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Differences in light susceptibility arise from a variety of individual differences (e.g., sex, age, chronotype or genetics).

    “These differences in light susceptibility arise from a variety of individual differences (e.g., sex, age, chronotype or genetics)”

    From Preliminary Results: The Impact of Smartphone Use and Short-Wavelength Light during the Evening on Circadian Rhythm, Sleep and Alertness (2021) · cites this paper as [67]

    The review identifies age, sex, chronotype and genetic haplotypes as candidate traits underlying differences in light sensitivity (passages 1 and 5). Its Figure 1 conceptual scheme says those differences “may be ascribed” to these traits, so the claim’s unqualified “arise from” is stronger than the source’s conclusion. Page numbers were not provided in the excerpts. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 130 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Boyce P, et al. The Benefits of Daylight Through Windows. Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  2. Toh KL, et al. An hPer2 phosphorylation site mutation in familial advanced sleep phase syndrome. Science. 2001;291(5506):1040–1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chellappa, S. L.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Chellappa, Sarah L
Venue
Sleep
Published
2020-10-13
Volume
44
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W3091969560
Cited by
163
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (STaR/0015/2013)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Impact of Light on Environment and Health
Keywords
individual differences, photosensitivity, circadian rhythm, melatonin suppression, artificial light at night, evening light exposure, chronotype, haplotypes, age and sex differences, night shift workers, personalized lighting, retina
MeSH terms
Circadian Rhythm, Humans, Individuality, Melatonin, Quality of Life, Sleep, Photophobia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review