Cited by 53Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Brain-based classification of negative social bias in adolescents with nonsuicidal self-injury: Findings from simulated online social interaction

Open access
Perini, Irene, Gustafsson, Per A., Hamilton, J. Paul, Kämpe, R., Mayo, Leah M., Heilig, Markus, Zetterqvist, Maria·2019·EClinicalMedicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interpersonal stress and perceived rejection have been clinically observed as common triggers of nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI), with self-injury behavior regulating both affective and social experiences. We investigated whether the subjective interpretation of social interaction in a simulated online environment might be biased in the NSSI group, and the brain mechanisms underlying the experience. METHODS: Thirty female adolescent patients with NSSI and thirty female age-matched controls were investigated in this case-control study. In our novel task that simulates interaction on current social media platforms, participants indicated whether they liked or disliked pictures of other players during a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan. Participants also viewed positive and negative feedback directed toward them by others. The task also assessed the subjective effects of the social interaction. Finally, subjects underwent a separate facial electromyography session, which measured facial expressions processing. OUTCOMES: Behaviorally, the NSSI group showed a negative bias in processing social feedback from others. A multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) identified brain regions that robustly classified NSSI subjects and controls. Regions in which mutual activity contributed to the classification included dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, a region implicated in mood control. In the NSSI group, multi-voxel classification scores correlated with behavioral sensitivity to negative feedback from others. Results remained significant after controlling for medication, symptoms of depression, and symptoms of borderline personality disorder. INTERPRETATION: This study identified behavioral and neural signatures of adolescents with NSSI during social interaction in a simulated social media environment. These findings highlight the importance of understanding social information processing in this clinical population and can potentially advance treatment approaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.06.016

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relative to depressed adolescents, depressed self-injurers show increased activation in medial PFC, ventrolateral PFC, and parahippocampus during exclusion versus inclusion trials, suggesting self-injurers may view social exclusion more negatively.

    “Relative to depressed adolescents, depressed self-injurers show increased activation in the medial PFC, ventrolateral PFC, and parahippocampus during exclusion versus inclusion trials; suggesting that self-injurers may view social exclusion more negatively (88) (c.f., (89)).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perini, I., Gustafsson, P. A., Hamilton, J. P., Kämpe, R., Mayo, L. M., Heilig, M., & Zetterqvist, M.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Perini, Irene
Venue
EClinicalMedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
13
Pages
81-90
ISSN
2589-5370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2954401043
Cited by
53
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EClinicalMedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Swedish Research Council (538-2013-7434)
  • Östergötland County (LIO-535931, LIO-520131)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
non-suicidal self-injury, adolescents, social rejection, social bias, social media, brain classification, multi-voxel pattern analysis, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, facial expression processing, interpersonal stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review