Cited by 47Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Interoception in anxiety, depression, and psychosis: a review

Open access
Jenkinson, Paul M., Fotopoulou, Aikaterini, Ibañez, Agustin, Rossell, Susan·2024·eClinicalMedicine

Abstract

Research has examined the relationship between interoception and anxiety, depression, and psychosis; however, it is unclear which aspects of interoception have been systematically examined, what the combined findings are, and which areas require further research. To answer these questions, we systematically searched and narratively synthesised relevant reviews, meta-analyses, and theory papers (total n = 34). Existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses (anxiety n = 2; depression n = 2; psychosis n = 0), focus on cardiac interoceptive accuracy (heartbeat perception), and indicate that heartbeat perception is not systematically impaired in anxiety or depression. Heartbeat perception might be poorer in people with psychosis, but further evidence is needed. Other aspects of interoception, such as different body systems and processing levels, have been studied but not systematically reviewed. We highlight studies examining these alternative bodily domains and levels, review the efficacy of interoception-based psychological interventions, and make suggestions for future research. Funding: Wellcome Trust UK.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102673

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Performance on cardiac interoceptive tasks appears influenced by external factors such as beliefs about heart rate, time estimation, and task instruction, which may confound observed effects.

    “Performance on these tasks appears influenced by external factors such as beliefs about heart rate, time estimation, and task instruction, which may confound observed effects [67, 72].”

    From Neural correlates of altered interoception in depressive and anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Interoception in anxiety section (page unavailable) says beliefs about heart rate and the ability to estimate time can bias heartbeat-counting performance. It lists task instructions as a moderator examined in a meta-analysis, but does not establish that instructions influenced performance or confounded the observed effects. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Commonly used cardiac interoceptive measures, particularly heartbeat perception tasks, show issues concerning validity and reliability.

    “Related to task variability, commonly used cardiac interoceptive measures, particularly heartbeat perception tasks, show issues concerning validity and reliability.”

    From Neural correlates of altered interoception in depressive and anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Interoception definition and assessment section says cardiac heartbeat perception is the most commonly used measure and that existing interoceptive measures have limitations. The Interoception in anxiety section identifies biases in heartbeat counting that raise validity concerns. The paper does not establish a reliability problem with the commonly used cardiac tasks; its call for reliability research concerns initial findings from newer procedures. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Improvements in interoceptive sensibility following these practices are associated with increasing insula responsiveness and reductions in anxiety and depressive symptoms.

    “Improvements in interoceptive sensibility following these practices are associated with increasing insula responsiveness and reductions in anxiety and depressive symptoms [65–67], highlighting a potential mediatory role.”

    From Neural correlates of altered interoception in depressive and anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [67]

    The section on interoception-based interventions (page unavailable) reports improved interoceptive ability after treatment in three of four relevant studies, reduced anxiety or depressive symptoms in some studies, and mediation of reduced depression by self-reported interoceptive ability in two. It does not report increasing insula responsiveness or establish an association linking all three changes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jenkinson, P. M., Fotopoulou, A., Ibañez, A., & Rossell, S.
Affiliations
  • Cairnmillar Institute (AU)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Jenkinson, Paul M.
Venue
eClinicalMedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-07
Volume
73
Pages
102673
ISSN
2589-5370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399206143
Cited by
47
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EClinicalMedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG057234, R01AG075775)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
interoception, anxiety, depression, psychosis, heartbeat perception, body awareness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review