Cited by 40School Choice and PerformanceEducational Outcomes and InfluencesEarly Childhood Education and Development

Effects of year-round schooling on disadvantaged students and the distribution of standardized test performance

Graves, Jennifer·2011·Economics of Education Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.04.003

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graves, J.
Affiliations
University of Oklahoma (US)
Corresponding author
Graves, Jennifer
Venue
Economics of Education Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
1281-1305
ISSN
0272-7757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101799491
Cited by
40
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
15.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Economics of Education Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
year-round schooling, academic calendar, standardized test performance, academic performance, disadvantaged students, low socioeconomic status, limited English proficiency, African American students, California

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review