Cited by 80Higher Education Research StudiesSchool Choice and PerformanceIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Losing HOPE: Financial aid and the line between college and work

Carruthers, Celeste K., Özek, Umut·2016·Economics of Education Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.03.014

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature to date has shown that merit programs can lead to increases in college enrollment and performance.

    “increases in college enrollment and performance (Bruce & Carruthers, 2014;Carruthers & Özek, 2016;);”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Carruthers & Özek, 2016

  • Losing HOPE scholarship leads to slightly higher near-term earnings; losing federal aid due to SAP leads to reductions in quarterly earnings over six years.

    “Carruthers & Özek (2016) find that those who lose HOPE earn slightly more in the near term, while Scott-Clayton and Schudde (2020) find reductions in quarterly earnings over six years.”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Carruthers & Özek (2016)

  • When students lose access to financial aid because of performance requirements, they complete fewer credits and appear to leave college more quickly.

    “Quasi-experimental studies of academic performance requirements in Tennessee's HOPE scholarship (Carruthers & Özek, 2016) as well as of Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) rules for federal aid recipients (Schudde & Scott-Clayton, 2016;Scott-Clayton & Schudde, 2020) find that when students lose access to financial aid because of performance requirements, they complete fewer credits and appear to”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Carruthers & Özek, 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carruthers, C. K., & Özek, U.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • American Institutes for Research (US)
Corresponding author
Carruthers, Celeste K.
Venue
Economics of Education Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
53
Pages
1-15
ISSN
0272-7757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2397027846
Cited by
79
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
44.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Economics of Education Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
financial aid, HOPE Scholarship, university dropout, student income, graduation, college enrollment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review