The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Sharing the rubrics with students can have the added benefit of enhancing learning by allowing for feedback and self-assessment (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Jonsson and Svingby, 2007
In the citing paper
“Designing and using rubrics to grade assignments or tests can reduce inconsistencies and make grading written work more objective.”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Jonsson and Svingby, 2007
In the citing paper
“Perhaps most importantly, sharing grading rubrics with students can support them in identifying where their thinking has gone wrong and promote learning (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Jonsson and Svingby, 2007
Citations
Cites
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.1061 · Cited by 1,733
Educational Research: Fundamentals for the Consumer
McMillan, J. H. (1991) · Cited by 1,265
The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935 · Cited by 1,206
Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543070003287 · Cited by 1,170
Stemler, S. E. (2020) · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/96jp-xz07 · Cited by 1,064
Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education
Brown, G. A., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315004914 · Cited by 929
Authentic assessment of teaching in context
Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(00)00015-9 · Cited by 715
A Systems Approach to Educational Testing
Frederiksen, J. R., & Collins, A. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018009027 · Cited by 607
The Impact of Self- and Peer-Grading on Student Learning
Sadler, P., & Good, E. (2006) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1 · Cited by 535 · cited 3×
“The study by Sadler and Good (2006) puts the presumed benefits of peer-grading to the test.”
BackgroundScoring Rubric Development: Validity and Reliability
Moskal, B., & Leydens, J. A. (2020) · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/q7rm-gg74 · Cited by 502
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (submitted for publication). Assessment in competence-based education: How can assessment quality be evaluated? Educational Research Review.
- Mott, 2003, Applying an analytic writing rubric to children's hypermedia “narratives”, Early Childhood Research & Practice: An Internet Journal on the Development, Care, and Education of Young Children, 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,001
Huang, X., Jen, F., Lian, Y., & Jiao, J. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-0205-6_9 · Cited by 1
Lukman, P. R., Wiguna, T., Soemantri, D., Menaldi, S. L., Elvira, S. D., Sutanto, L., Sapiie, T. W. A., Kekalih, A., Noviasari, R. R., Rizki, H. S., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1389992 · Cited by 1
Öç, U., Özgür, E. O., & Karakaya, İ. (2024) · Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.37217/tebd.1501178 · Cited by 1
Beyond Exams: Designing Competency-Based Assessments for the 21st Century Learner
Thorat, S. M. (2025) · International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology · doi:10.48175/ijarsct-25603 · Cited by 1
Selvik, J. T., Abrahamsen, E. B., Jimarkon, P., & Marshall, T. J. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00567-7 · Cited by 1
“To take advantage of rubrics in grading for higher reliability, they should be designed and implemented in an appropriate way [42].”
Pacios, A. R., & Bravo, B. R. (2025) · Education for Information · doi:10.1177/01678329251352063 · Cited by 1
“Jonsson and Svingby (2007) boil these seven characteristics down to three: validity, reliability, and transparency.”
Rosmawati, E., Apriliya, S., & Muslihin, H. Y. (2025) · Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education · doi:10.56916/jirpe.v4i3.1371 · Cited by 1
Bridging Gaps Between Student and Expert Evaluations of AI-Generated Programming Hints
Phung, T., Wu, M., Choi, H., Soares, G., Gulwani, S., Singla, A. K., & Brooks, C. A. (2025) · ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S) · doi:10.1145/3698205.3733932 · Cited by 1
“Rubrics are a well-established tool for teachers to evaluate the quality of students’ work [12, 26].”
Inter-rater reliability of global and analytic assessment of prosthodontic procedures
Baik, K. M. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-07732-4 · Cited by 1
“Two evaluation methods have traditionally been used to evaluate dental procedures: the global method (“glare and feedback to students and identify weaknesses and strengths in teaching to inform curriculum changes [8, 9].”
Role of Adaptable Rubrics in Modern Education: A Systematic Review
Gupta, P., & Mehrotra, D. (2025) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-5066-8_23 · Cited by 1
Candelario, D. M., Patel, K., Srivastava, S. B., Mobley-Bukstein, W., Lehman, N. P., & Kane, S. P. (2025) · Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102464 · Cited by 1
Developing a Formative Assessment Criteria-referenced Tool (FACT) for doctoral students
Grainger, P., Scott, J. R., Mulgrew, K. E., Dean, M. M., Carey, M. D., & Johnston, C. A. (2025) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2025.2556048 · Cited by 1
“Rubrics enhance the quality assurance of summative assessment by increasing scoring reliability (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007), and they can also increase students’ academic performance, metacognitive and self-regulatory strategies including self-assessment (Grainger et al., 2018; Panadero et al., 2023;…”
Küçük, M. (2025) · Selcuk Dental Journal · doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.1678399 · Cited by 1
Gondivkar, S. M., Panchbhai, A., Gadbail, A. R., & Gaikwad, R. N. (2025) · The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice · doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3853 · Cited by 1
Improving critical data literacy skills through an integrated curriculum in journalism education
Luque, S. G., Solà, N. S. I., Bugs, R. C., & Crusafón, C. (2025) · Communication Teacher · doi:10.1080/17404622.2025.2562072 · Cited by 1
“This assessment model allowed for the ongoing monitoring of students’ progress in critical competencies such as problem-solving, collaboration, and ethical communication of results (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007).”
InfluentialA New Rubric Designed for Teaching and Learning
Wertheim, J. A., Stoll, L., & Zozakiewicz, C. (2025) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2025.2579642 · Cited by 4
“At the most basic level, a rubric needs to provide accurate and appropriate judgments about students’ performance on an assessment, but it has the potential to also go a step further and improve instruction (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007).”
InfluentialYao, W., & Saad, M. N. (2025) · Asian Education and Development Studies · doi:10.1108/aeds-02-2025-0061 · Cited by 1
PISA 2022 Creative Thinking: What It Is, What It Is Not, and What Next?
Foster, N., & Piacentíni, M. (2025) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.70068 · Cited by 1
Meyer, A., Fischer, S., & Friege, G. (2025) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/3bs7-fnrd · Cited by 1
Tracking Peer-Teacher Agreement in Educational Robotics Assessment
Krcho, J. (2025) · International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA) · doi:10.1109/iceta67772.2025.11280125 · Cited by 1
“Analytical rubrics have proven to be a very effective tool, providing clearly structured criteria and performance levels, thereby reducing subjectivity and increasing the reliability of assessment [17, 18].”
OSCE Dyadic Subscales: Validity and Reliability Testing with Nursing and Social Work Practitioners
Tyler, T. R., Franklin, A. E., & Gilbert, G. E. (2025) · Studies in Clinical Social Work Transforming Practice Education and Research · doi:10.1080/28376811.2025.2605024 · Cited by 1
Horita, S., Izumiya, M., Kondo, S., Mizumoto, J., Mori, H., & Eto, M. (2025) · The Asia Pacific Scholar · doi:10.29060/taps.2025-10-4/oa3552 · Cited by 1
Alqahtani, S. M. (2026) · Frontiers in Dental Medicine · doi:10.3389/fdmed.2025.1728355 · Cited by 1
Zamorano, D. E., Panadero, E., Alqassab, M., & Gómez-Varela, J. (2026) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101560 · Cited by 2
Rating procedures to evaluate generic critical online reasoning in an open Internet environment
Hartig, J., Drake, P., Illmann, J., Köhler, C., Kohmer, A., & Stroganova, A. (2026) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-025-01365-5 · Cited by 1
Building Computational Literacy through Computational Thinking in Pre-Service Preschool Teachers
Özen, S. O., & Mazman, S. G. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3787453 · Cited by 1
“As Jonsson and Svingby (2007) emphasize, such rater training and consensus-building are essential for applying rubrics consistently.”
Reliability in Industry-Academia Assessment: A Framework for Validating Competencies in IT Education
Jakkaew, P., Putjorn, P., & Chondamrongkul, N. (2026) · Joint International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology with ECTI Northern Section Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering (ECTI DAMT & NCON) · doi:10.1109/ectidamtncon67592.2026.11460083 · Cited by 1
“Its primary observable symptom is a large disparity between high relative consistency (IRR) and low absolute agreement (IRA), invalidating the use of raw mean scores for high-stakes decisions [10].”
Human in the Loop AI Framework for Fair and Reliable Educational Assessment
Cho, Y.-S., Kim, K., Kim, D.-J., Kim, D.-K., & Koh, D.-W. (2026) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Computer, Data Sciences and Applications (ACDSA) · doi:10.1109/acdsa67686.2026.11468169 · Cited by 1
“A mean SIM of 0.95 suggests that the AI comprehends student intent beyond literal transcription, while the ICC (0.78) surpasses the average human inter-rater reliability ( ≈ 0.70) reported in previous rubric-based studies [16], [17].”
InfluentialQinjie, S. (2026) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100601 · Cited by 5
Farkas, M., Dalotti, Á., & Szaller, Á. (2026) · Journal of Decision System · doi:10.1080/12460125.2026.2669317 · Cited by 1
Black, R. E., & Schafer, A. E. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.6c00269 · Cited by 1
Gültekin, A., Diri, S., & Özcan, M. (2026) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2026.104911 · Cited by 1
Hallinger, P., & Narong, D. K. (2026) · Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-026-09492-1 · Cited by 1
“We followed a structured, multi-phase development process to ensure its content validity (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007).”
Yeshimbetova, G., Baitasheva, G. O., Köksal, E. A., & Kozhabekova, E. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1795880 · Cited by 2
Human vs AI in NCLEX-style item review: Reliability, agreement, and efficiency using the NEIA rubric
Simms, R. C., Hensel, D., Cavanaugh, R., Fox, A. B., & Kumar, A. (2026) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104897 · Cited by 1
Hwang, G., Lin, C.-Y., & Chen, M. A. (2026) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2026.2696867 · Cited by 1
Metricized Scaffolds: AI-Enabled Simulation Training and Transfer in Human Resource Development
Xie, N., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci16080372 · Cited by 1
The Reliability of Human Evaluation of Large Language Models in Health Care Settings: Scoping Review
Yang, E., Ko, S., & Woo, H. (2026) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/98184 · Cited by 1
“Likert scales facilitate comparisons across responses by quantifying subjective judgments, whereas researcher-defined rubrics allow detailed criteria to be tailored to the study purpose and the characteristics of the evaluation task [118,119].”
Developing Learning in Faculty: Seeking Expert Assistance From Colleagues
Zakrajsek, T. D. (2014) · New Directions for Higher Education · doi:10.1002/he.20084 · Cited by 1
Development of a Student Self-Evaluation Instrument in Inquiries
van der Jagt, S. A. W., Rens, L. V., Schalk, H. H., Pilot, A., Vu, & Bewegingswetenschappen, F. D. G. E. (2012) · Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) · Cited by 1
Assessment of Technical Writing and Synthesis of Course Topics Utilizing a Standardized Rubric
Kunberger, T., & Gulf, F. (2011) · Cited by 1
Rynearson, L., & Reazin, D. (2015) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/p.25097 · Cited by 1
Estrategias de evaluación para las competencias transversales CT-02, CT-04 y CT-06
Pérez, C. E., Baviera‐Puig, A., & Vera, J. M. B. (2017) · Congreso de Innovación Educativa y Docencia en Red (IN-RED) · doi:10.4995/inred2017.2017.6669 · Cited by 1
Giralt, E. G., & Varela, J. L. M. (2017) · Perfiles Educativos · doi:10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2017.156.58289 · Cited by 1
RATERS’ BIAS, BACKGROUND AND PERCEPTION IN AWARDING SCORE OF WRITING PERFORMANCE
Rahayu, E. Y. (2017) · Premise Journal of English Education · doi:10.24127/pj.v6i2.1022 · Cited by 1
“In this regard, Jonsson and Svingby (2007) found out that: (1) the reliable scoring of performance assessments can be enhanced, especially if the rubrics are analytic, topics specific,and complemented with exemplars and/or rater training; (2) rubrics do not facilitate valid judgment of performance…”
BackgroundStudent Engagement with Rubrics to Promote Enhanced Written Communication of Health Information
Kedrowicz, A. A., Hammond, S., & Dorman, D. C. (2018) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-018-0608-4 · Cited by 1
Binh, P. D. U., An, P. L., Tuan, T. D., & Leppink, J. (2018) · Y HOC TP HO CHI MINH · doi:10.32895/ump.mpr.2.1.6 · Cited by 1
Assessing Individual and Group Oral Exams: Scoring Criteria and Rater Interaction
Yalçın-Çolakoğlu, Ö., & Selçuk, M. (2019) · Advances in Language and Literary Studies · doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.1p.147 · Cited by 1
“According to Jonsson & Svingby (2007) “performance assessments are designed to capture more elusive aspects of learning by letting the students solve realistic or authentic problems.””
BackgroundGRADO DE ACEPTACIÓN DE LOS ESTUDIANTES DEL USO DE LA PRENSA COMO HERRAMIENTA DE APRENDIZAJE ACTIVO
Gil, I. P., Guillén, A. M., Orden‐Cruz, C., & Díaz-Iglesias, S. (2019) · Journal of Management and Business Education · doi:10.35564/jmbe.2019.0009 · Cited by 1
“Las rúbricas permiten, entre otros aspectos (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007; Gática-Lara & Uribarren-Berrueta, 2013): • Identificar con claridad objetivos docentes, metas y pasos a seguir (Martínez-Rojas, 2008).”
BackgroundTHE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF A SINGLE-POINT RUBRIC TO ASSESS STUDENT WRITING PERFORMANCE
Popken, D. (2020) · Cited by 1
Lingaiah, J., & Dhanapal, S. (2020) · International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications · doi:10.29322/ijsrp.10.10.2020.p10602 · Cited by 1
“The “analytical scoring is useful in the classroom since the results can help teachers and students identify students’ strengths and learning need” (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007, p.132) To ensure the reliability of the scoring criteria for the overall pre-test and post-test argumentative essay writing…”
BackgroundSözlü Çevirmenliğe İlk Adım: SÖBES
Aytaş, G. (2021) · International Journal of Languages Education · doi:10.29228/ijlet.46635 · Cited by 1
Implementation of Problem-Based Learning in Process Safety and Risk Management Unit
Chin, B. L. F., Juwono, F. H., & Yong, K. S. C. (2020) · International Conference on e-Learning (econf) · doi:10.1109/econf51404.2020.9385508 · Cited by 3
EDUCATION EXECUTIVES VIEWS ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT OF AUTHENTIC LEARNING AND ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTS
Kasimatis, K., & Papageorgiou, T. (2021) · Advances in education and educational trends · doi:10.36315/2021ead11 · Cited by 1
Segura, A. O., Jimenez‐Perez, I., & Priego‐Quesada, J. I. (2022) · Retos · doi:10.47197/retos.v45i0.91197 · Cited by 1
“…información al propio profesor sobre la efectividad del proceso de enseñanza que está llevando a cabo; reducen en gran medida la subjetividad; fomentan la responsabilidad y son fáciles tanto de explicar como de utilizar (García-Ros, 2011; Jonsson & Svingby, 2007; Maciá, 2015; Martínez-Rojas, 2008).”
BackgroundValcke, J., Giezynska, J., Nagy, A. D., & Eltayb, A. (2022) · CLIL Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education · doi:10.5565/rev/clil.80 · Cited by 1
Exploring the impact of the rubric on peer feedback content quality in online learning
Li, X., Zhou, X., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · International Conference on Distance Education and Learning (ICDEL) · doi:10.1145/3543321.3543344 · Cited by 1
“Historically, research on rubrics has been used either in a summative or in a formative approach [13][14].”
MethodElementary School Library Collections: A Content Analysis of Science Trade Books
Watson, S. W. (2022) · American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) · doi:10.3102/1878948 · Cited by 1
Assessing Academic/Intellectual Skills in Keene State College's Integrative Studies Program
Rancourt, A. (2010) · Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness · doi:10.2307/jasseinsteffe.1.1.0001 · Cited by 1
Assessing Academic/Intellectual Skills in Keene State College's Integrative Studies Program
Rancourt, A. (2010) · Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness · doi:10.2307/41163333 · Cited by 1
A bibliometric study of Rubrics in self – assessment
Huyền, N. T., Hoan, K. V., & Thuy, P. T. (2023) · International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) · doi:10.18535/ijsrm/v11i01.g01 · Cited by 1
Cicek, J. S., Mann, D., & Renaud, R. (2022) · Canadian Biosystems Engineering · doi:10.7451/cbe.2022.64.9.1 · Cited by 2
Service Learning in Business Program to Develop Critical Thinking in Language Skills
Wahyuni, E. S., Setiawan, S., & Anam, S. (2023) · Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice · doi:10.33423/jhetp.v23i6.5988 · Cited by 1
A Guiding Rubric for the Early-Career Doctoral Supervisor in Statistics
von Maltitz, M., Fabris‐Rotelli, I., Smit, A., Roberts, D., Das, S., & Maposa, D. (2023) · The Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on Education. · doi:10.33422/6th.iaceducation.2023.03.103 · Cited by 1
“However, it is noteworthy that both Polkinghorne et al. (2023) and our research agree on many items, and Polkinghorne et al. (2023) is recommended for wider referencing.”
BackgroundResultFarzana, T., & Ilahi, A. (2023) · Education Quarterly Reviews · doi:10.31014/aior.1993.06.03.769 · Cited by 1
The Enhancement of Prospective Teachers’ Competence and Awareness in the Understanding by Design
Akbaş, O., & BAŞARAN, O. (2023) · Participatory Educational Research · doi:10.17275/per.23.83.10.5 · Cited by 1
Othman, R., & Awang, M. I. (2019) · Journal of Educational System · doi:10.22259/2637-5877.0302008 · Cited by 1
Methods and Strategies: Rubrics: Useful Beyond Assessments
Benson, S. K., Therrien, W. J., Lovette, G. E., Doabler, C. T., & Longhi, M. A. (2022) · Science and Children · doi:10.1080/19434812.2022.12291787 · Cited by 1
Unveiling learning regulations through reflective notes
Li, J. (2023) · Language Education & Assessment · doi:10.29140/lea.v6n1.1235 · Cited by 2
Kınık, B., & Çetin, H. (2023) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0353-5.ch009 · Cited by 1
Rani, A., Gupta, S., Sehgal, G., & Singhal, R. (2023) · National Journal of Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.4103/njca.njca_103_23 · Cited by 1
Freedman, E. B., Gourd, T. Y., Schamberger, B., & Nash, A. S. (2024) · The Journal of Social Studies Research · doi:10.1177/23522798241230300 · Cited by 1
“Following established protocol in rubric design (Artino et al., 2014; Dawson, 2017; Jonsson & Svingby, 2007; Yuan & Recker, 2015), we drafted items for each dimension, drawing from existing instruments where possible.”
MethodTan, T. H., & Tan, W. H. E. (2024) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101402 · Cited by 1
Fitrah, M., Sofroniou, A., Ofianto, Judijanto, L., & Widihastuti (2024) · Journal of Education and e-Learning Research · doi:10.20448/jeelr.v11i3.5861 · Cited by 1
“Reliability refers to the degree of consistency or stability in test results (Reynolds, Livingston, Willson, & Willson, 2010) reflecting the consistency of test scores when measured through the same process (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007).”
MethodSavul, E. G., Doğan, S., & Nalbantoğlu, Ü. Y. (2024) · İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.17679/inuefd.1446457 · Cited by 3
Özgür, E. O., & Karakaya, İ. (2024) · Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.19171/uefad.1486010 · Cited by 1
Securing E-Voting Authentication: A Framework Integrating AI-Based Facial Recognition
Pasha, X., & Jahankhani, H. (2024) · Advanced sciences and technologies for security applications · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72821-1_2 · Cited by 1
Students' problem-solving skills in-depth: ready for ‘real life’?
Calma, A. (2025) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101267 · Cited by 7
Zhu, J. J. H., Lin, W. S., Gao, J., & Lu, H. (2025) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqaf047 · Cited by 1
A Rubric to Evaluate and Enhance Requirements Elicitation Interviewing Skills
Lending, D., Ezell, J. D., Dillon, T. W., & May, J. (2022) · Journal of Information Systems Education · doi:10.62273/ytnl5269 · Cited by 1
Cohall, D., & Skeete, D. H.-A. (2014) · Cited by 1
Work integrated learning at a university of technology: Assessment and management
Kuriakose, R. B., & Swart, A. J. (2014) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie.2014.7044374 · Cited by 1
“WIL AT THE CENTRAL UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY The Engineering Council of South Africa (ECSA) is a statutory body which overlooks and governs the different engineering programmes offered at all higher education and training institutions in South Africa, ascertaining that they adhere to the rules and regulations set forth…”
BackgroundCandela, F., Peiró, A. C., Ronda, L. E., Ferrándiz, J., García, I., García, L., Gassó, V., Ibáñez, V., López, A. I., Nácher‐Mestre, J., et al. (2016) · Congreso de Innovación Educativa y Docencia en Red (IN-RED) · doi:10.4995/inred2016.2016.4392 · Cited by 1
Construcció i validació d'instruments per avaluar competències genèriques, en educació superior
Saldaña, G. N., Gracia, G. N. M., Villalobos, C. P., & Marcel, V. C. (2019) · Anuari de Psicologia de la Societat Valenciana de Psicologia · doi:10.7203/anuari.psicologia.17.2.113 · Cited by 1
“…criteris a avaluar i nivells escalars d’acompliment que especifiquen l’estàndard per a cadascun (Ciudad i Valverde, 2014; Irles, Ortells, De la Calle i De la Sen Fernández, 2011; Jonsson i Svingby, 2007), la qual cosa en conjunt permet determinar la qualitat de l’execució dels estudiants.”
InfluentialMarzá, N. E. (2017) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature · doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.7p.198 · Cited by 1
“According to Jonsson and Svingby (2007), the reliable scoring of performance can be fostered by the use of rubrics, especially if they are analytic, topic-specific and complemented with rater training.”
BackgroundWoitschach, P., Díaz-Pérez, C., Argüelles, D. F., Fernández-Castañón, J., Fernández-Castillo, A., Rodríguez, L. F., Canal, M. C. G., Marqués, I. L., Espinosa, D. M., Cabrero, R. N., et al. (2018) · R E M A Revista electrónica de metodología aplicada · doi:10.17811/rema.23.1.2018.12-27 · Cited by 1
Student Perception of Scalable Peer-Feedback Design in Massive Open Online Courses
Kasch, J., van Rosmalen, P., Löhr, A., Ragas, A. M. J., & Kalz, M. (2018) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97807-9_5 · Cited by 1
“Students need to be informed and trained about the rubric criteria in order to be used effectively [17].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialQuiroz-Sandoval, G., Bravo, C. M., & Schulz, A. K. (2018) · Educación Médica · doi:10.1016/j.edumed.2018.10.003 · Cited by 1
Scaling up Student Assessment: Issues and Solutions
van Vliet, P. (2018) · Cited by 1
Gorjipour, H., & Hoseinpoor, M. (2018) · International Journal of English Language Teaching · doi:10.5430/ijelt.v6n1p20 · Cited by 1
¿Implicar a los estudiantes en la modificación de rúbricas influye sobre su percepción de validez?
Priego‐Quesada, J. I., Requena-Bueno, L., Jimenez‐Perez, I., & García-Ros, R. (2019) · Congreso de Innovación Educativa y Docencia en Red (IN-RED) · doi:10.4995/inred2019.2019.10416 · Cited by 1
Las rúbricas como herramienta de mejora del aprendizaje de la Termodinámica Técnica
Peña, B. (2019) · Congreso de Innovación Educativa y Docencia en Red (IN-RED) · doi:10.4995/inred2019.2019.10349 · Cited by 1
Reliability of grading using a rubric versus a traditional marking scheme in statistics
Morphett, A., Giagos, V., Gunn, S., & Reid, J. (2019) · e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) · Cited by 1
Gao, F., Zhao, N., & Li, X. (2020) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12443 · Cited by 1
RetractedWaagen, W. (2021) · doi:10.23865/noasp.119.ch2 · Cited by 3
Nivel de expresión escrita en la carta en alumnos de primaria rural de Tenosique Tabasco
Ara, L. J., Loarca, M. D. J. C., Dorantes, M. I. B., & Cortés, N. G. (2021) · Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar · doi:10.37811/cl_rcm.v5i1.286 · Cited by 1
Arrimada, M., Torrance, M., & Fidalgo, R. (2020) · Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) · Cited by 1
Writing performance in EFL at a college level using peer editing
de Chimborazo, E. S. P., Sánchez, S. E. C., Lozada, X. E. N., & de Ambato, U. T. (2020) · Editorial UTMACH eBooks · doi:10.48190/9789942241375.4 · Cited by 1
Students’ Attitudes about Self-Assessment: A Neglected Aspect in the Algerian EFL Classrooms
Kadri, N., & Amziane, H. (2021) · The Educational Review USA · doi:10.26855/er.2021.08.004
“In this vein, researchers have pointed out the failure of these tests to capture the multi-dimensional aspects of what students have learned (Mathies, 2000; Crooks, 1988; Wiggins & McTighe, 2007; Jonsson & Svingby, 2007; Darling-Hammond & Adamson, 2010).”
BackgroundScalable and Practical Interventions Faculty Can Deploy to Increase Student Success
Hempel, B., Blowers, P., & Kiehlbaugh, K. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--33252 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G.
- Affiliations
- Malmö University (SE)
- Venue
- Educational Research Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 130-144
- ISSN
- 1747-938X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115389369
- Cited by
- 1,509
- References
- 112
- Citations by year
- 2026: 221 · 2025: 145 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 27.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
- Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
- Keywords
- rubrics, performance evaluation, scoring reliability, assessment validity, rater training, exemplars, analytic rubrics, rubric validation, learning promotion, feedback, self-assessment, teaching improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review