Cited by 1,509Student Assessment and FeedbackEducational Assessment and PedagogyTeacher Education and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences

Jonsson, Anders, Svingby, Gunilla·2007·Educational Research Review

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 112 references

7 of the 112 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (submitted for publication). Assessment in competence-based education: How can assessment quality be evaluated? Educational Research Review.
  2. Mott, 2003, Applying an analytic writing rubric to children's hypermedia “narratives”, Early Childhood Research & Practice: An Internet Journal on the Development, Care, and Education of Young Children, 5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,001

Metadata

Authors
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G.
Affiliations
Malmö University (SE)
Venue
Educational Research Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
130-144
ISSN
1747-938X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115389369
Cited by
1,509
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 221 · 2025: 145 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 34
FWCI
27.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
  • Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
Keywords
rubrics, performance evaluation, scoring reliability, assessment validity, rater training, exemplars, analytic rubrics, rubric validation, learning promotion, feedback, self-assessment, teaching improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review