The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Sharing the rubrics with students can have the added benefit of enhancing learning by allowing for feedback and self-assessment (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Jonsson and Svingby, 2007
In the citing paper
“Designing and using rubrics to grade assignments or tests can reduce inconsistencies and make grading written work more objective.”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Jonsson and Svingby, 2007
In the citing paper
“Perhaps most importantly, sharing grading rubrics with students can support them in identifying where their thinking has gone wrong and promote learning (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Jonsson and Svingby, 2007
Citations
Cites
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.1061 · Cited by 1,733
Educational Research: Fundamentals for the Consumer
McMillan, J. H. (1991) · Cited by 1,265
The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935 · Cited by 1,206
Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543070003287 · Cited by 1,170
Stemler, S. E. (2020) · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/96jp-xz07 · Cited by 1,064
Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education
Brown, G. A., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315004914 · Cited by 929
Authentic assessment of teaching in context
Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(00)00015-9 · Cited by 715
A Systems Approach to Educational Testing
Frederiksen, J. R., & Collins, A. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018009027 · Cited by 607
The Impact of Self- and Peer-Grading on Student Learning
Sadler, P., & Good, E. (2006) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1 · Cited by 535 · cited 3×
“The study by Sadler and Good (2006) puts the presumed benefits of peer-grading to the test.”
BackgroundScoring Rubric Development: Validity and Reliability
Moskal, B., & Leydens, J. A. (2020) · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/q7rm-gg74 · Cited by 502
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (submitted for publication). Assessment in competence-based education: How can assessment quality be evaluated? Educational Research Review.
- Mott, 2003, Applying an analytic writing rubric to children's hypermedia “narratives”, Early Childhood Research & Practice: An Internet Journal on the Development, Care, and Education of Young Children, 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,001
Ramsbottom, A., van Schalkwyk, M. C., Carters-White, L., Benylles, Y., & Petticrew, M. P. (2022) · Harm Reduction Journal · doi:10.1186/s12954-022-00648-y · Cited by 6
“[27].”
Validity and Reliability of the DAACS Writing Assessment
Akhmedjanova, D. R. (2019) · American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) · doi:10.3102/1508904 · Cited by 6
Assessment Framework for Immersive Learning: Application and Evaluation
Udeozor, C., Alfaro, J. L. D., & Glassey, J. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-47328-9_15 · Cited by 6
An assessment rubric on reflection in a career development learning component of a business course
Leong, R. (2012) · University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland) · Cited by 6
Philibert, I. (2015) · Educación Médica · doi:10.1016/j.edumed.2015.04.006 · Cited by 6
A Semi-Automatic Computer-Aided Assessment Approach for Marking and Providing Feedback Comments
Adesina, A., Stone, R. G., Batmaz, F., & Jones, I. (2015) · International Conference on Computer Supported Education · doi:10.5220/0005447000930100 · Cited by 6
“While holistic rubrics provide a single base or an overall impression of a student’s performance on a task, analytic rubrics provide specific feedback along several dimensions (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Stevens and Levi, 2011).”
BackgroundBekki, J., Bernstein, B. L., Fabert, N., Gildar, N. J., & Way, A. K. (2014) · AEE Journal · Cited by 6
Exploration of a reflective practice rubric
Young, K., James, K., & Noy, S. (2016) · Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) · Cited by 6
Rios, J. A., Sparks, J. R., Zhang, M., & Liu, O. L. (2017) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/ets2.12185 · Cited by 8
The construction and pilot application of a scoring rubric for creative drama lesson planning
Korkut, P. (2017) · Research in Drama Education The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance · doi:10.1080/13569783.2017.1396211 · Cited by 6
“Although the existence of a rubric makes a more reliable evaluation, it does not necessarily guarantee validity (Jonsson and Svingby 2007).”
BackgroundA Critical Review on Recent Proposed Automated Programming Assessment Tool
Et.al, M. H. I. (2021) · Türk bilgisayar ve matematik eğitimi dergisi · doi:10.17762/turcomat.v12i3.799 · Cited by 6
“The importance of applying rubric for grading assignments is because of it capable of providing consistency of the grades [39].”
BackgroundResearch in Action: Using Rubrics to Assess Information Literacy Skills in Business Education
Makani-Lim, B., Agee, A., Wu, D., & Easter, M. E. (2014) · Cited by 6
Translating into English as a Non-Native Language: a translator trainer’s perspective
Jun, T. (2017) · The Translator · doi:10.1080/13556509.2017.1385941 · Cited by 6
“Furthermore, scholars have argued that reliable forms of assessment should ‘reflect the complexity of the real world and provide more valid data about student competence’ (Jonsson and Svingby 2007, 131).”
BackgroundPopelka, E. (2015) · doi:10.18297/etd/2324 · Cited by 6
“The degree of reliability was determined by calculating Cronbach’s alpha, and a sufficient benchmark of reliability was found, α = .87 (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007).”
BackgroundMethodCan AI Assess Writing Skills Like a Human? A Reliability Analysis
Ataseven, H., Bökeoğlu, Ö. Ç., & Taşdemir, F. (2025) · Kuramsal Eğitimbilim · doi:10.30831/akukeg.1718511 · Cited by 5
Gumilar, S., Ong, Y. S., Bhakti, D. D., Amalia, I. F., Nurdiana, D., & Widodo, A. (2025) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2025.2584203 · Cited by 5
Tang, C., Xiong, J., & Engelhard, G. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15070912 · Cited by 5
Simulation Performance Evaluation: Inter-rater Reliability of the DARE2-Patient Safety Rubric
Walshe, N., O’Brien, S., Hartigan, I., Murphy, S., & Graham, R. (2014) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2014.06.005 · Cited by 5
The Syllabus as a Tool to Enhance Teaching & Learning in Construction Education
Farrow, C. B., & Leathem, T. (2020) · International Journal of Construction Education and Research · doi:10.1080/15578771.2020.1741049 · Cited by 6
“Jonsson and Svingby (2007) reported that the reliability of rubrics increases when the rubric is “analytic, topic-specific, and complemented with exemplars” all of which were included.”
BackgroundDesign of peer assessment rubrics for ICT topics
Bowen-Mendoza, L. E., Pinargote-Ortega, M., Meza, J., & Ventura, S. (2021) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-021-09297-9 · Cited by 8
Frisén, L. B., Sundqvist, P., & Sandlund, E. (2021) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages6040204 · Cited by 5
“…of a multi-dimensional performance, using them for assessment can give an indication of test-takers’ potentially jagged performance profiles (Davis 2018; Khabbazbashi and Galaczi 2020), and analytic rubrics are therefore beneficial for formative feedback purposes (Jönsson and Svingby 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMartínez‐Huertas, J. Á., Olmos, R., Jorge‐Botana, G., & León, J. A. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01764-6 · Cited by 5
“Each conceptual axis considered the inclusion of some sub-topics and a coherent discourse following the criteria established by Jonsson and Svingby (2007) and León et al. (2006).”
MethodA Futures Perspective on Information Technology and Assessment
Lodge, J. M. (2018) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_43 · Cited by 5
Cervantes, R., Dias, M., Gomes, B., Carolino, E., & Viegas, C. (2022) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos13071123 · Cited by 5
“Several advantages of using scoring rubrics in performance assessments have been advocated, including enhanced scoring uniformity, the ability to allow correct evaluation of difficult abilities, and learning promotion [23].”
BackgroundFerrer-Pardo, V. R., Jimenez‐Perez, I., Gil-Calvo, M., Pérez‐Soriano, P., & Priego‐Quesada, J. I. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12110765 · Cited by 5
Modelling Assessment Rubrics through Bayesian Networks: a Pragmatic Approach
Mangili, F., Adorni, G., Piatti, A., Bonesana, C., & Antonucci, A. (2022) · International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM) · doi:10.23919/softcom55329.2022.9911432 · Cited by 5
“In this paper, we consider only assessment methods based on a task-specific assessment rubric [6] defined for assessing a given competence through a given task or family of similar tasks.”
MethodMoin, M., Golnik, K. C., Feizi, S., Buyandelger, A., & Adrianzén, R. (2022) · Annals of Translational Medicine · doi:10.21037/atm-22-3075 · Cited by 5
“In order to overcome this hurdle a valid and reliable rubric has been shown to be a very effective tool (1).”
MethodGarcia-Ros, R., Ruescas-Nicolau, M.-A., Serrano, N. C., Flor-Rufino, C., Valenzuela, C. S. M., & Sánchez-Sánchez, M. L. (2024) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-024-01643-7 · Cited by 10
“…(a) analytic and topic-specific rubrics, completed with examples and/or rater training, can enhance the reliability of scoring when assessing performance [26]; and, (b) a comprehensive framework (validity) can facilitate valid judgement or performance assessment when validating a rubric [18, 32].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGrimalt‐Álvaro, C., Simó, V. L., & Tena, È. (2024) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-024-10457-3 · Cited by 5
“Through this process, the validity of the rubric (particularly its construct validity) was ensured, following the guidelines provided by Jonsson and Svingby (2007) to build scoring rubrics.”
Effect of the 6+1 Trait Writing Model on student writing achievement
DeJarnette, N. K. (2008) · Scholars Crossing (Liberty University) · Cited by 5
The Role of Rubrics in Fair Assessment Practices
Jácome, É. P. (2013) · Íkala Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura · doi:10.17533/udea.ikala.14080 · Cited by 5
Student Self-Assessment in Middle School Mathematics: A Pilot Study
Warner, Z. B., Chen, F., & Andrade, H. (2012) · OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) · Cited by 5
A Macro-level Error Analysis of Iranian Undergraduate EFL Learners’ Performance on Writing Tasks
Davoudi, M., Nafchi, A. M., & Mallahi, O. (2015) · Journal of Studies in Education · doi:10.5296/jse.v5i4.8516 · Cited by 6
“As for the effectiveness of rubrics in educational settings, Jonsson and Svingby (2007), after reviewing a total of 75 studies on the use of rubrics and their benefits in performance assessment, commented that such devices have advantages like “increased consistency of scoring, the possibility to…”
BackgroundMartínez, L. C. V., Arceo, F. D. B., & Hurtado, J. C. T. (2017) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.185 · Cited by 5
Testing Inter-Rater Reliability in Rubrics for Large Scale Undergraduate Independent Projects
Chong, A., & Romkey, L. (2017) · Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.6465 · Cited by 5
Jönsson, A., Rosenlund, D., & Alvén, F. (2017) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2017.00048 · Cited by 5
“To strengthen reliability, detailed rubrics, training, and/or moderation procedures could be used (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007); to strengthen validity, assessments should not only rely on written responses but also include oral performance. limitations and Future research Several limitations of this…”
MethodGonzález, J. M. V., & Palacios, F. J. P. (2017) · Perspectiva educacional · doi:10.4151/07189729-vol.57-iss.1-art.642 · Cited by 5
Problem Solving Ability Assessment Based on Design for Secondary School Students
Chusinkunawut, K., Nugultham, K., Wannagatesiri, T., & Fakcharoenphol, W. (2018) · International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education · Cited by 5
McIntyre‐Hite, L., Cheney, M. C., Bever, S. W., Mast, L., & Hapka, A. R. (2018) · The Journal of Competency-Based Education · doi:10.1002/cbe2.1170 · Cited by 5
The Impact of Collaborative Writing and The Stream of Consciousness Technique on Writing
Dimililer, Ç., & Kurt, M. (2019) · Khazar journal of humanities and social sciences · doi:10.5782/2223-2621.2019.22.3.71 · Cited by 5
“Furthermore, in terms of the assessment of creativity, recent research emphasized the importance of analytic criteria (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007; Shaplin & Morris, 2013).”
BackgroundDevelopment of Rubric to Measure Children’s Creativity in Game Design
Ibharim, L. F. M., Yatim, M. H. M., Zain, N. Z. M., Azizan, U. H., & Fabil, N. (2021) · The International journal of Multimedia & Its Applications · doi:10.5121/ijma.2021.13203 · Cited by 5
The raters’ differences in Arabic writing rubrics through the Many-Facet Rasch measurement model
Baharudin, H., Maskor, Z. M., & Matore, M. E. E. M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988272 · Cited by 5
“Several researchers noted the evaluation of educators is more accurate when using the rubric (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Rezaei and Lovorn, 2010).”
BackgroundRaddawi, R., & Bilikozen, N. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64104-1_9 · Cited by 5
Meyer-Beining, J. (2020) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100368 · Cited by 5
Horvat, S. A., Rončević, T. N., Arsenović, D. Z., Rodić, D. D., & Segedinac, M. (2020) · Journal of Baltic Science Education · doi:10.33225/jbse/20.19.64 · Cited by 5
Jurström, R. S., Lindgren, M., & Zandén, O. (2021) · doi:10.23865/noasp.119.ch1 · Cited by 5
Carmosino, M., & Minnes, M. (2020) · ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) · doi:10.1145/3328778.3366946 · Cited by 5
“Grading with rubrics can help evaluations be fair, consistent, and reliable [3, 9, 18].”
BackgroundJanssen, F. J. J. M., & Tigelaar, D. E. H. (2018) · Educación Química · doi:10.1016/s0187-893x(17)30106-4 · Cited by 5
“…standards may be resolved by providing more (subject-specific) benchmarks as exemplars of performance for each of the criteria and levels of functioning as was also asked for by some of our supervisors/assessors, and which is also contended in the review on rubrics by Johnsson and Svingby (2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialHutter, V., Pijpers, J. R., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2015) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.10.006 · Cited by 5
“Jonsson and Svingby (2007) concluded that both consensus estimates (e.g., percent agreement or Cohen's kappa) and consistency estimates (e.g., Spearman or Pearson correlations) often do not meet the minimum values required for acceptable judgements.”
BackgroundPoirier, T. I., Hecht, K. A., Lynch, J. C., Otsuka, A. S., Shafer, K., & Wilhelm, M. (2015) · Journal of Dental Education · doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2015.79.4.tb05900.x · Cited by 5
Assessment Analytics for Peer-Assessment: A Model and Implementation
Divjak, B., Grabar, D., & Maretić, M. (2016) · Cited by 5
Park, H., & Yan, X. (2019) · Studies in Language Assessment · doi:10.58379/nkdc1529 · Cited by 5
“These practical considerations may explain why holistic scales are more common in writing assessment (Conner, 1991) and recommended for large-scale tests (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007; Xi & Mollaun, 2006).”
BackgroundA Mixed Methods Study on Evaluations of Virginia's STEM-Focused Governor's Schools
Stith, K. M. (2017) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · Cited by 5
Alshehri, A. H., Moaleem, M. M. A., Meshni, A. A., Gadah, T. S., Alahmari, N. M., Albar, N. H. M., Adawi, H., Al-Makramani, B. M. A., Shubayr, M. A., & Nandalur, K. R. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-07512-0 · Cited by 4
“…with subjective, global (glance and grade) assessment methods, analytical rubrics offer several advantages; they provide meaningful feedback on the strengths and weaknesses of each parameter, and the criteria can be weighted to reflect the relative importance of different dimensions [12, 14].”
Olvet, D. M., Kruidering, M., Fulton, T. B., Truong, B., Endo, K., Lucito, R., & Willey, J. M. (2026) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-026-02638-2 · Cited by 4
“Assessment literature describes two rubric categories used for scoring OEQs: analytic and holistic rubrics [ 28 ].”
Interrater and intra-rater reliability of the VERA-2R tool
Duits, N., & Kempes, M. M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1236295 · Cited by 4
“First of all, because structured risk judgements serve as the basis for important decisions in the criminal justice process (19), and, as such, should be wholly independent of the observers or professional assessors (32).”
BackgroundMore pain, more gain? Extricating the effect of student involvement in rubric co-construction
Zhang, W., Li, Y., & Zhang, W. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2331177 · Cited by 4
“A rubric is defined as a document with scoring criteria and detailed descriptions that specify levels of performance (Andrade 2000; Jonsson and Svingby 2007; Fraile, Panadero, and Pardo 2017; Brookhart 2018).”
Yeo, S. L. S., Signorelli, C., Vo, K., & Smith, G. (2024) · Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development · doi:10.1177/23821205241277337 · Cited by 4
Pyo, S., Gascó‐Hernández, M., Martin, E. G., & Luna‐Reyes, L. F. (2025) · Journal of Public Affairs Education · doi:10.1080/15236803.2024.2439213 · Cited by 4
“Additionally, rubrics can provide valuable insights for assessing the effectiveness of teaching practices, aligning with the purpose of this study (Fitzpatrick & Miller-Stevens, 2009; Jonsson & Svingby, 2007; Ragupathi & Lee, 2020).”
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Lu, C., & Chen, W. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-8193-8_3 · Cited by 4
Automatic Evaluation of Programming Tasks Supported by Language Models
Karsa, Z. I., & Goldschmidt, B. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3601448 · Cited by 6
ZaQQ: A New Arabic Dataset for Automatic Essay Scoring via a Novel Human–AI Collaborative Framework
Elsayed, Y., Nabil, E., Torki, M., Faizullah, S., & Khalafallah, A. (2025) · Data · doi:10.3390/data10090148 · Cited by 8
Lai, X., Lai, Y., Chen, J., Huang, S., Gao, Q., & Huang, C. (2025) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106202 · Cited by 4
Haufler, A. J., Lewis, G. F., Davila, M. I., Westhelle, F., Gavrilis, J., Bryce, C. I., Kołacz, J., Granger, D. A., & McDaniel, W. W. (2018) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2017.00217 · Cited by 4
“A scoring rubric (51, 52) was developed to evaluate the participants’ responses provided during the SPEAR task.”
MethodAlaamer, R. A. (2021) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v14n11p144 · Cited by 4
Supervision and assessment in midwifery practice during a global pandemic: A cohort survey
Fisher, M. L., Tomson, A., & Chenery-Morris, S. (2022) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103318 · Cited by 4
“of a range of tools to appeal to different learning styles or personalities was demonstrated, with the innovative Wordles and Lexicon Frameworks being preferred to commonly used rubrics (Johnsson and Svingby, 2007; Donaldson and Gray, 2012).”
Presler-Marshall, K., Heckman, S. S., & Stolee, K. T. (2023) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET) · doi:10.1109/icse-seet58685.2023.00030 · Cited by 4
“Prior work has shown that even with rubrics, precisely evaluating contributions requires subjective judgement [13]; thus TAs are unlikely to draw meaningful single-point distinctions.”
BackgroundSiu, B. W. Y., Yi, C. N., & Afzaal, M. (2023) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2023.2298409 · Cited by 4
“Further, the designing and integration of discipline-specific writing rubrics enable the provision of targeted feedback to students which allows them to make specific revisions to enhance their writing proficiency (Jonsson and Svingby 2007).”
Moothedath, M. (2024) · Journal of Education and Health Promotion · doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1016_23 · Cited by 6
“[3,4] Thus, it is difficult to get an overview of the successful use and design of rubrics for academic purposes.”
BackgroundLaurie, R., Bridglall, B. L., & Arseneault, P. (2015) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244015584616 · Cited by 4
“Scoring rubrics not only contribute to the reliability and validity of an assessment but also enable defensible judgment of complex competencies, which in turn enable educators to tailor instruction in efforts to promote student learning (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007).”
BackgroundAssessing competence in sport psychology: An action research account
Hutter, V., Pijpers, J. R., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2016) · Journal of Sport Psychology in Action · doi:10.1080/21520704.2016.1167150 · Cited by 7
“However, interrater reliability was still fairly low, and thus remains an issue of concern, as also reported elsewhere in the literature (e.g., Hutter, Pijpers, & Oudejans, 2016; Jonsson & Svingby, 2007; Muse & McManus, 2013).”
ResultVillamañe, M., Larrañaga, M., Álvarez, A., & Ferrero, B. (2016) · Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'21) · doi:10.1145/3012430.3012541 · Cited by 4
“The use of rubrics is becoming very popular because they are scoring tools that lay out the specific expectations for an assignment, encouraging consistent grading and increasing objectivity in the evaluation [5], [6].”
BackgroundDura, S. M. (2016) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-78635-064-020161015 · Cited by 5
Validity in Rehabilitation Research: Description and Classification
Salimi, Z., & Ferguson-Pell, M. (2017) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/67389 · Cited by 4
Assessing Professional Competencies: The “Painstaking” Implementation Phase
Diaz, R. (2014) · Journal of Public Affairs Education · doi:10.1080/15236803.2014.12001793 · Cited by 4
“…rubrics helped in obtaining insights to the many challenges in measuring performance and professional competencies, the subjective nature of scoring, and the importance of achieving consensus and consistency in scoring (Johnson, Penny, & Gordon, 2000; Jonnson & Svingby, 2007; Stemler, 2004).”
BackgroundGrading and interim feedback processes for a case method course
Mu, F., & Hatch, J. E. (2019) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832323.2019.1583160 · Cited by 4
“…classroom participation contribution (Gioia, 1987; Jones, 2008; Mello, 2010, Pepper & Pathak, 2008; Rocca, 2010; or the design of rubrics for case exams or assignments (Francis, 2018; Jonsson & Svingby, 2007; Panadero & Jonsson, 2013; Riddle, Smith, & Frankforter, 2016; Rochford & Borchert, 2011).”
Efforts to Improve Undergraduate Grader Consistency: A Qualitative Analysis
Hicks, N., & Douglas, K. A. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--30366 · Cited by 4
“On the other hand, open-ended problems, much like those frequently encountered in engineering, require wellestablished rubrics based on specific learning objectives (LOs) to achieve adequate consistency [6]–[8].”
BackgroundRickett, C., Joseph, S., Northcote, M. T., Christian, B., & Seddon, J. (2019) · TEXT · doi:10.52086/001c.23589 · Cited by 4
Kurmaca Metinleri Değerlendirmeye Yönelik Rubrik Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması
Şen, E. (2020) · Turkish Studies - Educational Sciences · doi:10.29228/turkishstudies.41821 · Cited by 4
ProCAD: Looking at a Fuller Picture of the Teacher Candidate
Laughter, J. C., Brown, A., & Neu, L. W. (2020) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487120972635 · Cited by 4
“…and scale nature of rubrics, they are evaluated for trustworthiness based on pass/fail or adjacent-level agreements rather than uniformity of exact score from multiple raters or rating events (e.g., Hansson et al., 2014; Jonsson & Svingby, 2007; Stellmack et al., 2009; van Helvoort et al., 2017).”
BackgroundAutoevaluación del aprendizaje clínico en estudiantes de enfermería. Validación de rúbrica
Fernández, M. B. E., Herrera, B. B., Celedón, I. J., Acevedo, C. M., & Carvajal, R. G. (2021) · Zona Próxima · doi:10.14482/zp.34.610.73 · Cited by 4
Method to Record and Analyze the Operation of Seal Robot in Elderly Care
Kuramochi, K., Wada, K., Kimita, K., Kurokawa, H., Inoue, K., & Shimomura, Y. (2021) · Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics · doi:10.20965/jrm.2021.p0730 · Cited by 4
The Effects of Different Rater Training Procedures on ESL Essay Raters’ Rating Accuracy
Rethinasamy, S. (2021) · Pertanika journal of social science & humanities · doi:10.47836/pjssh.29.s3.21 · Cited by 4
Reid, K., Chiavaroli, N. G., & Bilszta, J. L. C. (2022) · Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development · doi:10.1177/23821205221081813 · Cited by 4
Jönsson, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.836334 · Cited by 8
“For example, systematic reviews of research on rubrics seem to suggest that the transparency provided by the use of such instruments may, among other things, support student selfregulation (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Panadero and Jonsson, 2013).”
BackgroundPalermo, T. B., Cappellari, L. D. R., Chiappero, J., Meneguzzi, R. D. V., Gil, S. S., Giordano, W. F., & Banchio, E. (2022) · Journal of Biological Education · doi:10.1080/00219266.2022.2108105 · Cited by 4
“From the teacher’s perspective, this produces greater transparency, which promotes reflective practice and helps provide feedback (Jonsson and Svingby 2007).”
BackgroundAssessment Development in Measuring Students’ Context-rich Problem-solving Ability in Physics
Pelobillo, G. (2022) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.29333/iji.2022.15446a · Cited by 6
Daw, M. I. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2134552 · Cited by 4
Gan, S. Y., Bhattamisra, S. K., Zulkefeli, M., & Ho, K. L. (2023) · Pharmacy Education · doi:10.46542/pe.2023.231.193204 · Cited by 4
Mjenda, M., Mutarutinya, V., & Owiti, D. S. O. (2023) · International Journal of Education and Practice · doi:10.18488/61.v11i3.3434 · Cited by 4
Creating Equitable Grading Practices with Rubrics: A Teaching Assistant Training Activity
Borela, R., & Roy, N. (2023) · ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER) · doi:10.1145/3568812.3603485 · Cited by 4
“One potential solution to these challenges is the use of rubrics, which offer a structured approach to grading by adopting specific criteria for the quality of student work [1, 2].”
BackgroundPérez-Torregrosa, A.-B., Romero-López, M.-A., Ibáñez-Cubillas, P., & Gallego-Arrufat, M.-J. (2017) · Revista Practicum · doi:10.24310/revpracticumrep.v2i1.8265 · Cited by 4
Valverde, T. (2019) · Revista de educación y derecho · doi:10.1344/reyd2019.19.29097 · Cited by 4
“Teachers and students had the same items in their rubrics (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007; Panadero & Jonsson, 2013) to evaluate and peer evaluate, respectively.”
BackgroundVerdecho, M.-J., Alfaro-Saíz, J.-J., Rodríguez, R. R., & Gómez-Gasquet, P. (2020) · Central European Journal of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10100-020-00693-7 · Cited by 4
Flipping Professional Development to Improve Writing Skills in Undergraduates
Grose‐Fifer, J., Crossman, A. M., & Baker, S. M. (2021) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567555.2021.1954871 · Cited by 4
Viñas, L. F. (2022) · Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses · doi:10.14198/raei.2022.36.05 · Cited by 4
Approaches to Improving Writing Research, Instruction, and Performance
McCardle, P., Miller, B., & Connelly, V. J. (2017) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004346369_012 · Cited by 4
“Scoring written text has been a challenge historically for the field, including in classroom settings, where rubrics are generally used (see for review Jonsson & Svingby, 2007).”
MethodAdedoyin, C. A. (2013) · Journal of Teaching in Social Work · doi:10.1080/08841233.2013.774304 · Cited by 4
“Further, a lot of attention has been focused on identifying the empirical merits and demerits of using grading rubrics as an evaluative tool in students’ learning and pedagogy (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007; Reddy & Andrade, 2010).”
BackgroundRÚBRICAS Y EVALUACIÓN DE COMPETENCIAS EN LOS TFG Un paso atrás para saltar
Estapé‐Dubreuil, G., Ayza, M. R., Plana, C. L., Pons, J., & Parera, D. T. (2012) · Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G.
- Affiliations
- Malmö University (SE)
- Venue
- Educational Research Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 130-144
- ISSN
- 1747-938X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115389369
- Cited by
- 1,509
- References
- 112
- Citations by year
- 2026: 221 · 2025: 145 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 27.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
- Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
- Keywords
- rubrics, performance evaluation, scoring reliability, assessment validity, rater training, exemplars, analytic rubrics, rubric validation, learning promotion, feedback, self-assessment, teaching improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
