The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Sharing the rubrics with students can have the added benefit of enhancing learning by allowing for feedback and self-assessment (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Jonsson and Svingby, 2007
In the citing paper
“Designing and using rubrics to grade assignments or tests can reduce inconsistencies and make grading written work more objective.”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Jonsson and Svingby, 2007
In the citing paper
“Perhaps most importantly, sharing grading rubrics with students can support them in identifying where their thinking has gone wrong and promote learning (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Jonsson and Svingby, 2007
Citations
Cites
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.1061 · Cited by 1,733
Educational Research: Fundamentals for the Consumer
McMillan, J. H. (1991) · Cited by 1,265
The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935 · Cited by 1,206
Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543070003287 · Cited by 1,170
Stemler, S. E. (2020) · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/96jp-xz07 · Cited by 1,064
Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education
Brown, G. A., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315004914 · Cited by 929
Authentic assessment of teaching in context
Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(00)00015-9 · Cited by 715
A Systems Approach to Educational Testing
Frederiksen, J. R., & Collins, A. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018009027 · Cited by 607
The Impact of Self- and Peer-Grading on Student Learning
Sadler, P., & Good, E. (2006) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1 · Cited by 535 · cited 3×
“The study by Sadler and Good (2006) puts the presumed benefits of peer-grading to the test.”
BackgroundScoring Rubric Development: Validity and Reliability
Moskal, B., & Leydens, J. A. (2020) · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/q7rm-gg74 · Cited by 502
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (submitted for publication). Assessment in competence-based education: How can assessment quality be evaluated? Educational Research Review.
- Mott, 2003, Applying an analytic writing rubric to children's hypermedia “narratives”, Early Childhood Research & Practice: An Internet Journal on the Development, Care, and Education of Young Children, 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,001 of 1,001
Let’s read the log: root cause analysis of railway test execution logs with large language models
Hermawan, R., Bucaioni, A., Enoiu, E., Afzal, W., Saadatmand, M., Zaimovic, N., & Ibtasham, M. S. (2026) · Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11334-026-00657-1
Metadata
- Authors
- Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G.
- Affiliations
- Malmö University (SE)
- Venue
- Educational Research Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 130-144
- ISSN
- 1747-938X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115389369
- Cited by
- 1,509
- References
- 112
- Citations by year
- 2026: 221 · 2025: 145 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 27.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
- Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
- Keywords
- rubrics, performance evaluation, scoring reliability, assessment validity, rater training, exemplars, analytic rubrics, rubric validation, learning promotion, feedback, self-assessment, teaching improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
