Cited by 1,509Student Assessment and FeedbackEducational Assessment and PedagogyTeacher Education and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences

Jonsson, Anders, Svingby, Gunilla·2007·Educational Research Review

DOI 10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The Concept of Validity.
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.1061 · Cited by 1,733
Educational Research: Fundamentals for the Consumer
McMillan, J. H. (1991) · Cited by 1,265
The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935 · Cited by 1,206
Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543070003287 · Cited by 1,170
A Comparison of Consensus, Consistency, and Measurement Approaches to Estimating Interrater Reliability
Stemler, S. E. (2020) · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/96jp-xz07 · Cited by 1,064
Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education
Brown, G. A., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315004914 · Cited by 929
Authentic assessment of teaching in context
Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(00)00015-9 · Cited by 715
A Systems Approach to Educational Testing
Frederiksen, J. R., & Collins, A. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018009027 · Cited by 607
The Impact of Self- and Peer-Grading on Student Learning
Sadler, P., & Good, E. (2006) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1 · Cited by 535 · cited 3×
“The study by Sadler and Good (2006) puts the presumed benefits of peer-grading to the test.”
Background
Scoring Rubric Development: Validity and Reliability
Moskal, B., & Leydens, J. A. (2020) · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/q7rm-gg74 · Cited by 502

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 112 references

7 of the 112 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (submitted for publication). Assessment in competence-based education: How can assessment quality be evaluated? Educational Research Review.
Mott, 2003, Applying an analytic writing rubric to children's hypermedia “narratives”, Early Childhood Research & Practice: An Internet Journal on the Development, Care, and Education of Young Children, 5

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,001

Applying a framework to evaluate assignment marking software: a case study on Lightwork
Heinrich, E., & Milne, J. (2012) · Research in Learning Technology · doi:10.3402/rlt.v20i0.16152 · Cited by 4
Research Review
Svingby, G., & Nilsson, E. M. (2011) · Advances in game-based learning book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-495-0.ch001 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Incremental self-assessment rubrics for capstone design courses
Trevelyan, J. (2015) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/p.24288 · Cited by 5
A Curriculum Challenge—The Need for Outcome (Competence) Descriptors
Stupans, I. (2017) · Pharmacy · doi:10.3390/pharmacy5010007 · Cited by 8
“Rubrics have the potential to promote learning by making expectations and criteria for assessments of learning outcomes explicit [17].”
Background
Teaching Tip: Improving Students' Email Communication through an Integrated Writing Assignment in a Third-Year Toxicology Course
Kedrowicz, A. A., Hammond, S., & Dorman, D. C. (2017) · Journal of Veterinary Medical Education · doi:10.3138/jvme.0816-124r2 · Cited by 4
Exploring Students’ Perspectives toward Clarity and Familiarity of Writing Scoring Rubrics: The Case of Saudi EFL Students
Aldukhayel, D. (2017) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v10n10p1 · Cited by 4
“…on rubrics; however, have focused largely on type and focus of performance task, type of rubrics used, measures of reliability and validity, measures of impact on students’ learning, and students’ and teachers’ attitudes towards using rubrics as an assessment tool (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007).”
Method
Reliability Analysis of Complementary Assessment Tools for Measuring Teacher Candidate Dispositions
Nweke, W. C., Perkins, T., & Afolabi, C. Y. (2019) · Georgia Educational Researcher · doi:10.20429/ger.2019.160202 · Cited by 4
Evaluating lecturer development process. A project proposal called DIPRO 2.0
Díaz, V. M., Almenara, J. C., & Osuna, J. B. (2012) · Educar · doi:10.5565/rev/educar.29 · Cited by 4
The Validation of a Short-cycle Formative Assessment Observation Protocol for Science and Mathematics Instruction
Heitz, L. (2013) · University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · doi:10.12794/metadc407820 · Cited by 4
“Jonsson and Svingby (2007) suggest considering holistic scores as well as exact agreement in order to provide a measure of rater consistency.”
Using Digital Stories and iPads to Promote Writing Skills, Writing Self-efficacy, and Motivation to Write among 9th Grade Students
Girasoli, A. J. (2016) · OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) · Cited by 4
Implementing and managing self assessment procedures
Armstrong, T. (2013) · doi:10.31390/gradschool_theses.3636 · Cited by 6
Detecting and explaining differential item functioning on the social, academic, and emotional behavior risk screener
Izumi, J. T. (2020) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · doi:10.32469/10355/79502 · Cited by 4
DEVELOPMENT OF AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT FOR SUPPORTING THE INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL IN BASIC ELECTRONICS 1 COURSEPreprint
Asrizal, A., Hufri, & Festiyed, F. (2018) · doi:10.31227/osf.io/6zswd · Cited by 4
Benchmarking Green Chemistry Adoption by “Big Pharma” and Generics Manufacturers [1]
Veleva, V. R., & Cue, B. W. (2018) · doi:10.1002/9781119288152.ch22 · Cited by 4
An Investigation of the Doctoral Dissertation Literature Review: From the Materials We Use to Prepare Students, to the Materials That Students Prepare
Fitt, M. R. H. (2021) · ProQuest Demo Repository · doi:10.26076/326d-494b · Cited by 4
How do university faculty feel about grading? Insights from a control-value theory perspective
Schwab, C., Frenzel, A. C., Jaeger, J., BrckaLorenz, A., & Stupnisky, R. H. (2023) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2023.2269190 · Cited by 3
“For example, to directly tackle the problem of perceived low diagnostic competence, the use of rubrics seems promising (Jonsson and Svingby 2007; Malou ﬀ and Thorsteinsson 2016).”
The analysis of marking reliability through the approach of gauge repeatability and reproducibility (GR&R) study: a case of English-speaking test
Sureeyatanapas, P., Sureeyatanapas, P., Panitanarak, U., Kraisriwattana, J., Sarootyanapat, P., & O’Connell, D. (2024) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-023-00271-z · Cited by 3
“Presenting the criteria and providing additional illustrative examples to students facilitates their comprehension of the important dimensions associated with each criterion during the assessment (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007).”
Background
Examining the effect of imaginary short story activities in Turkish courses on the higher level thinking skills of eighth grade students
Aydın, N., & YILDIZ, V. A. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-04158-z · Cited by 7
“Rater reliability, the degree of consistency between scores given by two or more raters, can be measured in various techniques, including percentage of agreement, correlation coef ﬁ cient, and ANOVA based on difference between scores (Jonsson and Svingby 2007).”
Effectiveness of Using Analytical Grading Method for Crown Preparation Performed by Dental Students - An In-Vitro Study
Abdulghani, M. N., & Jellil, E. I. (2024) · Indian Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_308_24 · Cited by 3
Evaluating the Efficacy of AI-Generated Inquiry-Based Lesson Plans in Science
Kahraman, N., & Kıyıcı, G. (2025) · Sakarya University Journal of Education · doi:10.19126/suje.1463067 · Cited by 3
Reconceptualizing Scoring Reliability Through Linguistic Similarity
Jung, J. Y., Bezirhan, U., & von Davier, M. (2025) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131644251397428 · Cited by 4
Evaluating the performance of generative artificial intelligence models in multidimensional data analysis tasks: a comparative study with large language models
Demir, F., & Yavuz, U. (2026) · Discover Computing · doi:10.1007/s10791-026-09905-1 · Cited by 5
“The evaluation structure consists of five main categories and fourteen sub-criteria, which are scored using a rubric based on the analytical scoring approach proposed by Jonsson and Svingby [15].”
Evaluating Essay Assessment: Teacher-Developed Criteria versus Rubrics. Intra/Inter Reliability and Teachers’ Opinions /Procjena vrednovanja eseja: kriteriji vrednovanja koje su izradili nastavnici i rubrike. Individualna i međusobna pouzdanost ocjenjivač
Yetiş, V. A. (2019) · Croatian Journal of Education - Hrvatski časopis za odgoj i obrazovanje · doi:10.15516/cje.v21i1.2922 · Cited by 3
“…from essay to essay, and to display assessment criteria as a whole for performance assessments, such as writing skill (Berthiaume et al., 2011; Brookhart & Chen, 2015; East, 2009; Jonsson & Svingby, 2007; Moskal, 2000; Moskal & Leydens, 2000; Nitko, 2004; Reddy & Andrade, 2010; Scallon, 2004).”
Background
Scaling Up: Value added Cognitive Assessment Redesign Network for the Development of Higher-Order Thinking
Simper, N., Frank, B. M., Scott, J., & Beyer, W. (2019) · Cited by 3
Psychometric Properties of the Clergy Suicide Prevention Competencies Developmental Rubric and Faith Leaders’ Readiness to Address Suicide Stigma
Mason, K. E., Yoon, J., Taylor, E., Korver, D., & Hu, Y. (2021) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel12070541 · Cited by 3
“Regarding the CSPCDR’s development using grounded theory, Jonsson and Svingby (2007) found that expert opinion is the “number one route to get empirical evidence [of construct] validity” of scoring rubrics (p. 136).”
Method
A rating scale development study for the evaluation of lesson plans and teaching practices on argumentation-based inquiry
Yeşildağ-Hasançebi, F., YÜKSEL, B. T., & Mesci, G. (2022) · International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education · doi:10.21449/ijate.948489 · Cited by 3
Examining how using dichotomous and partial credit scoring models influence sixth‐grade mathematical problem‐solving assessment outcomes
May, T. A., Koskey, K. L. K., Bostic, J. D., Stone, G. E., Kruse, L., & Matney, G. T. (2023) · School Science and Mathematics · doi:10.1111/ssm.12570 · Cited by 3
An evaluation of the inter-rater reliability in a clinical skills objective structured clinical examination
de Beer, V., Nel, J., Pieterse, F., Snyman, A., Joubert, G., & Labuschagne, M. J. (2023) · African Journal of Health Professions Education · doi:10.7196/ajhpe.2023.v15i2.1574 · Cited by 3
Assessing the Content Quality of Industry Technology Roadmaps
Li, S., Li, Y., & Yu, W. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15119058 · Cited by 3
An Integrated Instruction and a Dynamic Fuzzy Inference System for Evaluating the Acquirement of Skills through Learning Activities by Higher Middle Education Students in Mexico
Leal-Ramı́rez, C., & Echavarría-Heras, H. (2024) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math12071015 · Cited by 3
Factors influencing the agreement between teachers and students in the assessment of preclinical endodontics using a rubric
Baracco, B., Escribano, N., Silva, D. D., Belliard, V., Ceballos, L., & Fuentes, V. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-07193-9 · Cited by 3
“Rubrics provide guidance and objectivity in evaluating students across various disciplines, enhancing consistency among multiple assessors [6].”
Comparative analysis of AI and expert evaluations in engineering design pedagogy
Coşkun, T. K., & Altan, E. B. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0332715 · Cited by 8
“According to established benchmarks [96,97], ICC values above 0.81 are considered “good,” supporting the rationale for using expert evaluation as the reference standard in subsequent comparisons with AI-based assessments.”
Influential
La rúbrica de un taller de escritura para enseñar a sinohablantes en el contexto universitario europeo: estudio de caso
Lorenzo, M. T. C. (2014) · Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras · doi:10.30827/digibug.30492 · Cited by 3
The systematic development of rubrics in assessing engineering learning outcomes
Chow, T., Ko, E. I., Li, C., & Zhou, C. (2012) · IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale.2012.6360364 · Cited by 3
“A pilot is necessary to validate wording preferably with end users of the rubrics, and more importantly, to establish inter-rater reliability through examining consistency between different assessors [3].”
Background
Redesigning The iNACOL Standards For K-12 Online Course Design
Adelstein, D., & Barbour, M. K. (2018) · Journal of Online Learning Research · doi:10.70725/018067dtrhcj · Cited by 3
A Futures Perspective on Information Technology and Assessment
Lodge, J. M. (2018) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_43-1 · Cited by 3
Scale-referenced, summative peer assessment in undergraduate interpreter training: self-reflection from an action researcher
Lee, S.-B. (2018) · Educational Action Research · doi:10.1080/09650792.2018.1477609 · Cited by 3
“Analytic scales are rarely used for peer assessment, but some researchers argue that a valid and reliable rating scale (especially a statistically sound scoring method) could support students’ learning and enhance the quality of peer assessment (Jonsson and Svingby 2007; Topping 2009).”
Inflated Clinical Evaluations: a Comparison of Faculty-Selected and Mathematically Calculated Overall Evaluations Based on Behaviorally Anchored Assessment Data
Meyer, E. G., Cozza, K. L., Konara, R. M. R., Hamaoka, D., & West, J. C. (2018) · Academic Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s40596-018-0957-8 · Cited by 3
Assessing young people’s citizenship attitudes using rubrics
Daas, R., Dijkstra, A. B., & Karsten, S. (2019) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.05.002 · Cited by 3
Does excluding students from co-creation of rubrics affect their academic achievement in the associated authentic assessment task?
Ghosh, S., Bowles, M., & Abeysiriwardhane, A. (2020) · Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs · doi:10.1080/18366503.2020.1810602 · Cited by 4
Severity-Leniency in Writing Assessment and Its Causal Factors
Azizah, N., Suseno, M., & Hayat, B. (2020) · KnE Social Sciences · doi:10.18502/kss.v4i14.7870 · Cited by 3
“[40] Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007).”
Observation of Field Practice Rubric: Establishing Content Validity and Reliability
Bhatnagar, R., Tanguay, C. L., Sullivan, C., & Many, J. E. (2021) · Georgia Educational Researcher · doi:10.20429/ger.2021.180201 · Cited by 3
Evaluating and developing teacher instructional practices in economics using a new video-based test
Day, S. H., Kuhn, C., & Saas, H. (2021) · The Journal of Social Studies Research · doi:10.1016/j.jssr.2021.09.006 · Cited by 3
THE EFFECT OF USING INSTRUCTIONAL RUBRICS ON EFL STUDENTS’ WRITING PERFORMANCE: A HIGH SCHOOL CASE IN THE MEKONG DELTA OF VIETNAM
Bui, M. C., & Vuong, K. T. M. (2022) · European Journal of English Language Teaching · doi:10.46827/ejel.v7i1.4112 · Cited by 3
“Furthermore, according to Jonsson and Svingby (2007), rubrics are supposed not only to help foster the assessment objectivity but to augment the reliability of scoring across students’ assignments and among different raters as well.”
Background
A comparative study of analytical assessment and holistic assessment in English writing tests
Hao, W. (2021) · Journal of Language Teaching · doi:10.54475/jlt.2021.001 · Cited by 3
Rubric as Assessment Tool for Lecturers and Students in Higher Education Institution
Mrangu, L. (2022) · Acta Pedagogia Asiana · doi:10.53623/apga.v1i1.98 · Cited by 3
“Other studies have examined rubrics' language and substance for certain populations [3,8,21].”
Background
Evaluating the impact of transparency on peer review quality in MOOCs
Perdue, M., & Sandland, J. G. (2022) · IEEE Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS) · doi:10.1109/lwmoocs53067.2022.9928020 · Cited by 3
“Several studies have shown that assessment design plays a role in reliability of peer grading, particularly that the inclusion of rubrics improves the overall accuracy [14], [15].”
Background
Rubric-based Learner Modelling via Noisy Gates Bayesian Networks for Computational Thinking Skills Assessment
Adorni, G., Mangili, F., Piatti, A., Bonesana, C., & Antonucci, A. (2023) · Journal of Communications Software and Systems · doi:10.24138/jcomss-2022-0169 · Cited by 6
The Ideal versus the Real Deal in Assessment of Physics Lab Report Writing
Passonneau, R. J., Koenig, K. M., Li, Z., & Soddano, J. (2023) · European journal of applied sciences · doi:10.14738/aivp.112.14406 · Cited by 3
Decomposing social-emotional skill rubrics: a methodological approach to examining acquiescence in rubrics’ ratings
Pancorbo, G., Primi, R., John, O. P., Santos, D. D. D., & Fruyt, F. D. (2023) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2023.2271679 · Cited by 4
“Similarly, a review of Jonsson and Svingby (2007) indicated that the majority of studies focused on basically two aspects of validity: content validity and external validity via the correlation of rubrics with other measures.”
Background
Akademik Öz Disiplin Ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması
Tekin, Ö. E., & Şal, F. (2023) · Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education · doi:10.30703/cije.1262071 · Cited by 3
O uso de rubricas na educação básica: Revisão e recomendações
Brookhart, S. M. (2024) · Estudos em Avaliação Educacional · doi:10.18222/eae.v35.10803 · Cited by 3
“…das revisões anteriores de estudos sobre o uso de rubricas no ensino superior ou no ensino superior e básico juntos (Brookhart & Chen, 2015; Jonsson & Svingby, 2007; Panadero & Jonsson, 2013; Panadero et al., 2023; Reddy & Andrade, 2010) avaliação formativa e o feedback , assim como as…”
The analytic use of rubrics in writing classes by language students in an EFL context: students’ writing model and benefits
Dahmash, N. F. B. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1588046 · Cited by 3
EFL Writing Assessment and Evaluation Rubrics in Yemen
Ghalib, T. K. A. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64104-1_10 · Cited by 3
Multi-criteria Fuzzy Ordinal Peer Assessment for MOOCs
Capuano, N., & Caballé, S. (2018) · Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98557-2_34 · Cited by 3
Towards an Annotation System for Collaborative Peer Review
Mader, S., & Bry, F. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23990-9_1 · Cited by 3
EVALUATING ORAL PROFICIENCY SKILL THROUGH ANALYTICS AND HOLISTIC WAYS OF SCORING
Namaziandost, E., Banari, R., & Momtaz, S. (2019) · Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews · doi:10.18510/hssr.2019.7547 · Cited by 3
Evaluation of Self and Peer Assessments in a Second Year Engineering Module
Hassell, D., & Lee, K.-Y. (2019) · IAFOR Journal of Education · doi:10.22492/ije.7.2.06 · Cited by 2
“Both Jonsson and Svingby (2007), and Reddy and Andrade (2010) have indicated that student use of a rubric must include an element of training for the student to understand its implementation.”
Background
‘Read it, now what? Engaging students with information literacy’
Foord, K. (2020) · Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning · doi:10.1108/heswbl-06-2020-0128 · Cited by 3
Constructing a roadmap to measure the quality of business assessments aimed at curriculum management
Silva, T., dos Santos, R., & Mallet, D. (2022) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832323.2021.2023855 · Cited by 3
“Pd ¼ Pq i¼1ni q:a (1) According to previous studies on the consistency of assessments that are graded using rubrics (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007; Newell, Dahm, & Newell, 2002; Stemler, 2004), the results must reach 70% or more of an exact agreement to be considered reliable among graders or have 10% of…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Peer-review in architecture education: Application in Geographic Information Systems learning
Garcia-Almirall, M. P., Domínguez, E. R., Dalmau, F. V., & Fonseca, D. (2015) · Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) · doi:10.1109/cisti.2015.7170497 · Cited by 3
“En este sentido, la aplicación de rubricas [4] en educación universitaria tiene la capacidad de mejorar el rendimiento académico [5], [6], cuando se aplica en evaluación entre iguales [7], alineando las calificaciones con las del profesorado y fomentando el pensamiento crítico [8].”
Background
Transversal competence assessment based in rubrics: An experience used in Childhood Education at the University of Barcelona
Puig, M. S. (2015) · tic revista d innovació educativa · doi:10.7203/attic.14.4176 · Cited by 3
Developing And Validating A Tool To Assess Ethical Decision-Making Ability Of Nursing Students, Using Rubrics
Indhraratana, A., & Kaemkate, W. (2012) · Journal of International Education Research (JIER) · doi:10.19030/jier.v8i4.7287 · Cited by 3
“(Jonsson & Svingby, 2007) The two research questions in this study are: To what extent do the EDM assessment rubrics demonstrate content validity?”
Background
Information and Communication Technologies and the impact of gender on the writing performance of students with ADHD
Ανδρέου, Γ., Riga, A., & Papayiannis, N. (2016) · Cited by 3
Recommending Dimension Weights and Scale Values in Multi-rubric Evaluations
Villamañe, M., Álvarez, A., Larrañaga, M., & Ferrero, B. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_90 · Cited by 3
La rúbrica en el examen oral de Traumatología y Ortopedia
Navas, P. Z., & Parra, E. G. (2017) · Educación Médica · doi:10.1016/j.edumed.2017.04.018 · Cited by 3
Introduction: Researching Innovative Perspectives in Professional Experience
Rorrison, D., Ambrosetti, A., Capeness, R., & Kriewaldt, J. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5484-6_1 · Cited by 3
OECDs gjennomgang av evaluering og valuering innen utdanning Norge
Nusche, D., Earl, L. M., Maxwell, W., & Shewbridge, C. (2013) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.1787/9789264196735-no · Cited by 3
Designing, Choosing, and Using Assessment Tools in Healthcare Simulation Research
Boulet, J. R., & Murray, D. J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26837-4_25 · Cited by 3
The regulatory effects of high-stakes accountability in preservice teacher evaluation
Kessler, M. A. (2019) · Teaching Education · doi:10.1080/10476210.2019.1685485 · Cited by 3
“Additionally, rubric-based evaluation tools can facilitate valuable feedback and transparency in the appraisal of practice (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007).”
BackgroundMethod
Evaluation of Multi-Peer and Self-Assessment in Higher Education
Hassell, D., & Lee, K.-Y. (2020) · International Journal of Innovative Teaching and Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.4018/ijitlhe.2020010104 · Cited by 22
Procedure for the assessment of cognitive complexity: Development and implementation in the topic "Hydrolysis of salts"
Horvat, S. A., Mihajlović, J., Rončević, T. N., & Rodić, D. D. (2021) · Macedonian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering · doi:10.20450/mjcce.2021.2240 · Cited by 3
Assessing Transversal Competences in Professional Internships: The Role of Assessment Agents
Dr., U. D. B., Romeo, M., Yepes-Baldó, M., Dr., U. D. B., Argüello, M. V. G., Dr., U. D. B., Burillo, S. B., Dr., U. D. B., Piñol, C. M., Dr., U. D. B., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.29333/iji.2022.15141a · Cited by 3
Using content validity measures to evaluate the Biosystems Engineering Program at the University of Manitoba
Cicek, J. S., Renaud, R. D., & Mann, D. (2022) · Canadian Biosystems Engineering · doi:10.7451/cbe.2020.62.9.1 · Cited by 3
How Facial Symmetry Influences the Learning Effectiveness of Computer Graphic Design in Makeup Design
Hsu, H.-H. (2022) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym14101982 · Cited by 3
Hayat Bilgisi Öğretiminde Hayal Gücü Geliştirici Etkinliklerin Öğrencilerin Yaratıcı Hayal Gücü Gelişimine Etkisi
AYDIN, Y., & Oksal, A. (2022) · Buca eğitim fakültesi dergisi (Online)/Buca Eğitim Fakültesi dergisi · doi:10.53444/deubefd.1109594 · Cited by 3
Evaluation of Flexible Learning Module on New Literacies for Preservice Teachers
Dapat, L., Alda, R. C., & Bacus, R. C. (2023) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.3.1842 · Cited by 6
“consistency in scoring [40] and student learning and”
Background
Formación de docentes en competencias digitales para la evaluación formativa mediante e-rúbricas colaborativas
Cebrián-Robles, V., Rey, F. J. R., & de la Serna, M. C. (2023) · RELATEC Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa · doi:10.17398/1695-288x.22.2.9 · Cited by 3
Finding the Questions: A Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study of Pre-Service Practitioner Inquiry
Barnatt, J. (2009) · ProQuest LLC eBooks · Cited by 3
Common Misunderstandings and Challenges in Learning Gauss’s Law in a Junior Level Electromagnetic Engineering Course
Byford, J. A., & Chahal, P. P. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73204-6_81 · Cited by 3
A Perception of Factors that Influence Academics’ Assessment Practices
Charlton, N. (2017) · Griffith Research Online · doi:10.25904/1912/987 · Cited by 3
La autoevaluación en el Grado de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte : concepciones y práctica de los docentes
Ruiz, J. F. (2017) · doi:10.20868/upm.thesis.49175 · Cited by 4
Developing expertise in leadership for educational change in research-intensive universities
Grunefeld, H. (2020) · doi:10.33540/42 · Cited by 3
Validating & implementing engineering graduate attribute rubrics in a biosystems engineering curriculum
Cicek, J. S., Mann, D., & Ingram, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie.2017.8190632 · Cited by 4
“They are descriptive rather than evaluative, communicating important aspects of performance [16], allowing both the assessor and the learner to match learner performance to the descriptor [27-29] as they are criterionbased [30].”
BackgroundMethod
Validating a forced-choice method for eliciting quality-of-reasoning judgments
Marcoci, A., Webb, M. E., Rowe, L. I., Barnett, A., Primoratz, T., Kruger, A., Karvetski, C. W., Stone, B., Diamond, M. L., Saletta, M., et al. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02234-x · Cited by 2
“Cardinal measurements have been extensively employed in measuring quality of reasoning and argumentation, usually supported by the use of a rubric (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007; Brookhart & Chen, 2015).”
Method
Embedding Sustainability in Existing Curriculum by Using Authentic Assessments, Rubrics, and Formative Assessments: A Case Study
Kushwah, L., Navrouzoglou, P., & Cheng, W. (2024) · World sustainability series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55996-9_16 · Cited by 3
Designing a rating scale for an integrated reading-writing test: A needs-oriented approach
Karakoҫ, A. I., Gu, P., & Ruegg, R. (2025) · Assessing Writing: An International Journal · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100918 · Cited by 4
Collaborative Scripts: A Scaffold to Enhance Research Self-efficacy and Intrinsic Motivation in Undergraduate Research Projects
Abdelshaheed, B. S. M. (2025) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.29333/iji.2025.18323a · Cited by 3
“Their potential is clear in providing explicit expectations and criteria to facilitate feedback and self-assessment (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007).”
Physiotherapists’ beliefs of the working mechanisms of manual therapeutic techniques for spinal pain relief: a quantitative content analysis
Hendriks, J. P., Reezigt, R. R., & Reneman, M. F. (2025) · Musculoskeletal Science and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103387 · Cited by 2
Smartphone-Assisted Experimentation as a Medium of Understanding Human Biology Through Inquiry-Based Learning
Campilongo, G. B., Tonzar-Santos, G., Verginio, M. E. D. S., & Lellis‐Santos, C. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15081005 · Cited by 7
“This also takes into account the student’s ability to argue and the teacher’s or evaluator’s capacity for judgment (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007).”
Influential
Tracking progress to foster motivation: implementing a rubric-based P-score model in Japanese university EFL courses
Miyazoe, T. (2025) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-025-00387-4 · Cited by 2
“Some degree of intra-and inter-rater variability is inherent in rubric-based human assessment (Huot, 1990; Jonsson & Svingby, 2007; Weigle, 2002).”
STEM teachers’ authentic problems of the knowledge society in their instructional designs
Yabaş, D., Ceyhan, G. D., Küçük, Z. D., & Çorlu, M. S. (2025) · Teacher Development · doi:10.1080/13664530.2025.2550413 · Cited by 2
“In their meta-analysis about use of scoring rubrics, Jonsson and Svingby (2007) concluded that ‘augmentation of rating scales’ (135) through increasing the number of levels could potentially result in enhanced inter-rater reliability.”
A wikipedia-based Authentic Task About Biodiversity in Pre-service Primary Science Teacher Education: Evaluation, Re-design and Validation of a Multidimensional Rubric for K-12 Content
Rico, A., Palacios-Agúndez, I., & Gonzalez-Larrañaga, G. (2025) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-025-10286-6 · Cited by 2
Toward Effective Research-to-Practice Partnerships: Understanding Readiness Indicators for Participation in Secondary Transition Research
Rowe, D. A., Mazzotti, V. L., Fredrick, D., Hrvatin, J., ARMSTRONG, H. G., Gau, J. M., Smolkowski, K., & Claywell, J. V. (2025) · Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals · doi:10.1177/21651434251381303 · Cited by 2
Student Peer Assessment in Clinical Operative Dentistry: A Retrospective Study
Hashem, D., Farag, A., Algarni, A. A., Mubarak, R. Z., Al-Wasifi, Y., & Saleh, S. A. (2025) · International Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1155/ijod/9268602 · Cited by 2
“However, faculty were trained to assess using the grading rubric for many years which according to previous studies can increase the validity and reliability of the used assessment method [15].”
Automatic Short‐Answer Grading in Sustainability Education: AI –Human Agreement
Emirtekin, E., & Özarslan, Y. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70160 · Cited by 4
Assessing Multimodal Compositions in EAP Context: Raters’ Perceptions and Operationalization of Assessment Criteria
Chan, S. W. C. (2025) · Language Assessment Quarterly · doi:10.1080/15434303.2025.2605656 · Cited by 2
“Beyond ensuring transparency, rubrics are often credited with enhancing scoring consistency (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007), increasing reliability (Penny et al., 2000), and fostering valid judgments in performance assessments.”
IR's Role in Piloting an Assessment Model: Coordination, Consultation and Compromise
Sweatman, R. A. (2015) · New Directions for Institutional Research · doi:10.1002/ir.20123 · Cited by 2
Construcción y validación de un test de producción textual
Rodríguez, A. B. (2016) · Universitas Psychologica · doi:10.11144/javeriana.upsy15-1.cvrm · Cited by 2
Maybe, maybe not: Probabilistic reasoning in preschool period
Ergül, A. (2018) · Erken Çocukluk Çalışmaları Dergisi · doi:10.24130/eccd-jecs.196720182149 · Cited by 2
“It also sets the standards for achieving these scores as well as important dimensions of performance (Jonsson & Svingby, 2007).”
Background

Authors: Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G.
Affiliations: Malmö University (SE)
Venue: Educational Research Review
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2007-01
Volume: 2
Issue: 2
Pages: 130-144
ISSN: 1747-938X (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
OpenAlex: W2115389369
Cited by: 1,509
References: 112
Citations by year: 2026: 221 · 2025: 145 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 34
FWCI: 27.98
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
Keywords: rubrics, performance evaluation, scoring reliability, assessment validity, rater training, exemplars, analytic rubrics, rubric validation, learning promotion, feedback, self-assessment, teaching improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks