Cited by 40Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesCardiovascular Issues in PregnancyAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy

Pregnancy outcome in Turner syndrome: a French multi-center study after the 2009 guidelines

Cadoret, Florence, Parinaud, Jean, Bettiol, Celia, Pienkowski, Catherine, Letur, Helene, Ohl, Jeanine, Sentilhes, Loïc, Papaxanthos, Aline +11 more·2018·European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to assess the application of the French guidelines for pregnancies in Turner syndrome (TS) and their impact on perinatal prognosis.Study design We performed a French multi-center retrospective study (14 centers), including TS pregnant patients (spontaneously or by Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART)) between January 2006 and July 2017. Only clinical pregnancies were analyzed. The adjustment of medical follow-up modalities to French guidelines was evaluated for all pregnancies after 2009. Pregnancies from oocyte donation (OD) after 2009 were compared to those of a cohort of TS pregnancies obtained by OD before 2009, which were reported by the French Study Group for Oocyte Donation.Results One hundred seventy pregnancies in 103 patients were included: 35 spontaneous, 5 by means of intra-conjugal ART, and 130 with OD. No serious maternal complications were observed. We reported two stillbirths and one intra uterine fetal death. The French guidelines were partially respected. The preconceptional assessment was carried out in 74% of cases. Cardiology follow-up during pregnancy was performed in accordance with guidelines in 74% of patients. Postpartum cardiac ultrasonography was performed in 45% of pregnancies but only in 11% within 8 days post-partum. When compared to the 2009 historical cohort, the rates of high blood pressure (19% vs. 38%; p < 0.005) pre-eclampsia (8% vs. 21%; p < 0.005) and prematurity <35 weeks (15% vs 38%; p < 0.0001) were lower.Conclusions The implementation of guidelines has allowed the standardization of TS pregnancy care and improved perinatal indicators for both mothers and children. However, an effort must be done, in a postpartum survey.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.08.005

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial estimates of maternal deaths due to aortic dissections during pregnancy were much higher than in more recent studies, probably because pre-pregnancy cardiac evaluations were performed less frequently in older cohorts.

    “Initial estimates of maternal deaths due to aortic dissections during pregnancy were much higher than in more recent studies, probably because pre-pregnancy cardiac evaluations were performed less frequently in older cohorts.510-513”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cadoret, F., Parinaud, J., Bettiol, C., Pienkowski, C., Letur, H., Ohl, J., Sentilhes, L., Papaxanthos, A., Winer, N., Mathieu d’Argent, E., Catteau-Jonard, S., Chauleur, C., Biquard, F., Hieronimus, S., Pimentel, C., Le Lous, M., Fontaine, N., Chevreau, J., & Parant, O.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR)
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
  • Institute Mutualiste Montsouris (FR)
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes (FR)
  • Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Réunion (RE)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie (FR)
Corresponding author
Parinaud, Jean
Venue
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
229
Pages
20-25
ISSN
  • 0028-2243 (ISSN-L)
  • 0301-2115
OpenAlex
W2886001423
Cited by
40
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Keywords
Turner syndrome, pregnancy outcomes, perinatal prognosis, oocyte donation, assisted reproduction, preconception care, preeclampsia, hypertension in pregnancy, preterm birth, stillbirth, intrauterine fetal death
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, France, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Retrospective Studies, Turner Syndrome, Oocyte Donation, Guideline Adherence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review