CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15Endometriosis Research and TreatmentOvarian function and disordersGynecological conditions and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preoperative serum anti-Müllerian hormone level is a potential predictor of ovarian endometrioma severity and postoperative fertility

Dong, Zhenzhu, An, Jian, Xie, Xi, Wang, Zhenhong, Sun, Pengming·2019·European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.06.024
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective To establish a model for predicting revised American Society of Reproductive Medicine (rASRM) scores before endometrioma surgery based on serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level and to identify factors that might reliably predict postoperative fertility of women diagnosed with endometrioma. Study design The study population was composed of 134 women with endometrioma, 58 with benign cyst, and 115 with non-ovarian lesion. Preoperative serum AMH level and clinical parameters were compared among three groups. Univariate correlation analyses and multivariate linear regression modeling with a stepwise method were performed for constructing an rASRM scores prediction model. Cox regression analysis was then used to identify predictive variables of spontaneous pregnancy following surgical treatment of endometrioma. Results Preoperative AMH level were significantly lower in the endometrioma group than in the other two groups (p 3.68 ng/ml, HR: 2.383; 95% CI, 1.093-5.197) were independent predictors for postoperative fertility. Conclusion Patients with advanced staged endometriosis tended to have a lower serum AMH level while postoperative infertility was more likely to occur in older patients with a lower level of serum AMH. Thus, timely detection of AMH levels to assess the severity of ovarian endometriosis and possibility for postoperative pregnancy success is necessary to ensure that optimal medical treatment can be provided.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.06.024

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Giudice, 2010, Clinical practice. Endometriosis, N Engl J Med, 362, 2389, 10.1056/NEJMcp1000274 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ballard, 2010, Can symptomatology help in the diagnosis of endometriosis? Findings from a national case-control study--Part 1, BJOG Int J Obstet Gycol, 115, 1382, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01878.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. Younis Johnny, 2019, Impact of unilateral versus bilateral ovarian endometriotic cystectomy on ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Hum Reprod Update, 25, 375, 10.1093/humupd/dmy049 · DOI
  4. Macer, 2012, Endometriosis and infertility: a review of the pathogenesis and treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility, Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am, 39, 535, 10.1016/j.ogc.2012.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Gleicher, 2011, Defining ovarian reserve to better understand ovarian aging, Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 9, 23, 10.1186/1477-7827-9-23 · DOI
  6. Sills, 2009, Ovarian reserve screening in infertility: practical applications and theoretical directions for research, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 146, 30, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.05.008 · DOI
  7. Sutton, 1997, Laser laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of ovarian endometriomas, J Am Assoc Gynecol Lap, 4, 319, 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)80222-1 · DOI
  8. American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 1997, Revised American society for reproductive medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996, Fertil Steril, 817, 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81391-X · DOI · Paper page
  9. Somigliana, 2012, Surgical excision of endometriomas and ovarian reserve: a systematic review on serum antimüllerian hormone level modifications, Fertil Steril, 98, 1531, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.009 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Van, 2010, Endometriomas: their ultrasound characteristics, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 35, 730, 10.1002/uog.7668 · DOI
  11. Koninckx, 2012, Deep endometriosis: definition, diagnosis, and treatment, Fertil Steril, 98, 564, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1061 · DOI · Paper page
  12. de Vet, 2002, Antimüllerian hormone serum levels: a putative marker for ovarian aging, Fertil Steril, 77, 357, 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02993-4 · DOI
  13. Marca, 2010, Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART), Hum Reprod Update, 16, 113, 10.1093/humupd/dmp036 · DOI
  14. Cate, 1986, Isolation of the bovine and human genes for Müllerian inhibiting substance and expression of the human gene in animal cells, Cell, 45, 685, 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90783-X · DOI
  15. Toner, 2013, Why we may abandon basal follicle-stimulating hormone testing: a sea change in determining ovarian reserve using antimüllerian hormone, Fertil Steril, 99, 1825, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.03.001 · DOI
  16. Marca, 2009, Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH): what do we still need to know?, Hum Reprod, 24, 2264, 10.1093/humrep/dep210 · DOI
  17. Camp, 2004, X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization, Clin Cancer Res, 10, 7252, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0713 · DOI
  18. Jeon, 2015, Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels before surgery in patients with ovarian endometriomas compared to other benign ovarian cysts, J Menopausal Med, 21, 142, 10.6118/jmm.2015.21.3.142 · DOI
  19. Kitajima, 2011, Endometriomas as a possible cause of reduced ovarian reserve in women with endometriosis, Fertil Steril, 96, 685, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.064 · DOI
  20. Lipari, 2014, Anti-mullerian hormone as a preoperative predictor of endometriosis, Fertil Steril, 102, e289, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.983 · DOI
  21. Hwu, 2011, The impact of endometrioma and laparoscopic cystectomy on serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels, Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 9, 80, 10.1186/1477-7827-9-80 · DOI
  22. Sandya, 2016, Size of Endometrioma and number does influence the ovarian reserve: a prospective observational study, J Matern-Fetal Neo M, 7, 14
  23. Chang, 2010, Impact of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve: serial changes of serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels, Fertil Steril, 94, 343, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.022 · DOI
  24. Streuli, 2012, In women with endometriosis anti-Mullerian hormone levels are decreased only in those with previous endometrioma surgery, Hum Reprod, 27, 3294, 10.1093/humrep/des274 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Somigliana, 2011, Surgical measures for endometriosis-related infertility: a plea for research, Placenta, 32, S238, 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.06.011 · DOI
  26. de Carvalho, 2011, Anti-Müllerian hormone is the best predictor of poor response in ICSI cycles of patients with endometriosis, Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 38, 119
  27. Falconer, 2009, IVF outcome in women with endometriosis in relation to tumour necrosis factor and anti-Müllerian hormone, Reprod Biomed Online, 18, 582, 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60138-1 · DOI
  28. Papaleo, 2011, Deep pelvic endometriosis negatively affects ovarian reserve and the number of oocytes retrieved for in vitro fertilization, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 90, 878, 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01161.x · DOI
  29. Crook, 1997, Elevated serum lipoprotein(a) levels in young women with endometriosis, Metabolism, 46, 735, 10.1016/S0026-0495(97)90115-3 · DOI
  30. Van, 2010, Comparison of inter- and intra-cycle variability of anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle counts, Hum Reprod, 25, 221, 10.1093/humrep/dep366 · DOI
  31. Baker Valerie, 2018, Multicenter evaluation of the Access AMH antimüllerian hormone assay for the prediction of antral follicle count and poor ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation, Fertil Steril, 110, 506, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.031 · DOI
  32. Wang, 2015, A higher anti-Mullerian hormone level is associated with an increased chance of pregnancy in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination, J Obstet Gynaecol, 35, 64, 10.3109/01443615.2014.935718 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dong, Z., An, J., Xie, X., Wang, Z., & Sun, P.
Affiliations
Fujian Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Sun, Pengming
ORCID
Venue
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
240
Pages
113-120
ISSN
  • 0028-2243 (ISSN-L)
  • 0301-2115
DOI
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.06.024
OpenAlex
W2949129368
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (2017J01236)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
anti-Müllerian hormone, endometrioma, endometriosis severity, postoperative fertility, spontaneous conception, CA125, age, prediction model, endometrioma surgery
MeSH terms
Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Fertility, Humans, Ovarian Diseases, Ovary, Postoperative Period, Pregnancy, Prognosis, Severity of Illness Index, Anti-Mullerian Hormone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review