Cited by 24Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Treatment

Pre-emptive antinociceptive effects of a synthetic cannabinoid in a model of neuropathic pain

Guindon, Josée, Desroches, Julie, Dani, Mélina, Beaulieu, Pierre·2007·European Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

The antinociceptive effects of WIN55,212-2, a synthetic cannabinoid, were evaluated in the model of partial sciatic nerve ligation after daily subcutaneous administration of 0.1 mg/kg a week before and two weeks after surgery. Mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia were evaluated in 46 rats allocated to receive: (1) Vehicle (before surgery)-Vehicle (after surgery); (2) Vehicle-WIN55,212-2; (3) WIN55,212-2-Vehicle; (4) WIN55,212-2-WIN55,212-2; (5) AM251+vehicle; (6) AM251+WIN55,212-2; (7) AM630+vehicle; (8) AM630+WIN55,212-2; (9) Sham receiving vehicle; and (10) Sham receiving WIN55,212-2. The decreased in mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia by WIN55,212-2 was significantly greater when it was administered during one week before surgery. In conclusion, pre-emptive use of cannabinoids produced greater antinociceptive effects in a model of neuropathic pain and this effect is mediated by cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.04.060

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the pSNL rat model, the potency of WIN55,212-2 (0.1 mg/kg) in decreasing allodynia and hyperalgesia was significantly greater when administered daily prior to surgery for 7 days and for the following 2 weeks than when administered only 2 weeks post-pSNL.

    “In the pSNL rat model, the potency of WIN55,212-2 (0.1 mg/kg) in decreasing allodynia and hyperalgesia was significantly greater when administered daily prior to the surgery for 7 days, and for the following 2 weeks, than when administered only 2 weeks post-pSNL (Guindon et al, 2007).”
  • Activation of cannabinoid receptors can prevent the development of pain induced by nerve injury.

    “These findings suggest that activation of cannabinoid receptors can prevent the development of pain induced by nerve injury.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guindon, J., Desroches, J., Dani, M., & Beaulieu, P.
Affiliations
Université de Montréal (CA)
Venue
European Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
568
Issue
1-3
Pages
173-176
ISSN
0014-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002804792
Cited by
24
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
WIN 55,212-2, synthetic cannabinoids, neuropathic pain, preemptive analgesia, partial sciatic nerve ligation, mechanical allodynia, thermal hyperalgesia, CB1 receptor, CB2 receptor, AM251, AM630, cannabinoid receptor antagonists
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Animals, Cannabinoids, Hyperalgesia, Indoles, Male, Morpholines, Naphthalenes, Pain, Piperidines, Pyrazoles, Sciatic Nerve, Rats, Wistar, Sciatic Neuropathy, Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1, Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2, Benzoxazines, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review