Cited by 74Extracellular vesicles in diseaseMesenchymal stem cell researchAcute Kidney Injury Research

Extracellular vesicles in renal tissue damage and regeneration

Open access
Bruno, Stefania, Porta, Stefano, Bussolati, Benedetta·2016·European Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) appear as important actors in cell-to-cell communication. EV content is characterized by proteins and RNA species that dynamically reflect cell and tissue state. Urinary EVs in particular may act in inter-nephron communication with possible beneficial or detrimental effects. Increasing interest is addressed to the pharmacological properties of EVs as a cell-free therapy, since several of the effects crAQ/tgqcedited to stem cells have been recapitulated by administration of their EVs. Preclinical data in models of renal damage indicate a general regenerative potential of EVs derived from mesenchymal stromal cells of different sources, including bone marrow, fetal tissues, urine and kidney. In this review we will discuss the results on the effect of EVs in repair of acute and chronic renal injury, and the mechanisms involved. In addition, we will analyse the strategies for EV pharmacological applications in renal regenerative medicine and limits and benefits involved.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.06.058

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bruno, S., Porta, S., & Bussolati, B.
Affiliations
University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
Bussolati, Benedetta
Venue
European Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
790
Pages
83-91
ISSN
0014-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2473715757
Cited by
74
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
Keywords
extracellular vesicles, renal tissue damage, kidney regeneration, cell-free therapy, mesenchymal stem cells, urinary extracellular vesicles, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, cell-to-cell communication, stem cell-derived vesicles
MeSH terms
Extracellular Vesicles, Animals, Cell Communication, Humans, Kidney, Regeneration, Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review