Cited by 100Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Impact of time on task on ADHD patient’s performances in a virtual classroom

Bioulac, Stéphanie, Lallemand, Stéphanie, Rizzo, Albert, Philip, Pierre, Fabrigoule, Colette, Bouvard, Manuel Pierre·2012·European Journal of Paediatric Neurology

Abstract

Background Use of virtual reality tool is interesting for the evaluation of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) patients. The virtual environment offers the opportunity to administer controlled task like the typical neuropsychological tools, but in an environment much more like standard classroom. Previous studies showed that a virtual classroom was able to distinguish performances of children with and without ADHD, but the evolution of performances over time has not been explored. The aim of this work was to study time on task effects on performances of ADHD children compared to controls in a virtual classroom (VC).Methods 36 boys aged from 7 to 10 years completed the virtual classroom task. We compared the performance of the children diagnosed with ADHD with those of the control children. We also compared attentional performances recorded in the virtual classroom with measures of the Continuous Performance Test (CPT II).Results Our results showed that patients differ from control subjects in term of time effect on performances. If controls sustained performances over time in the virtual reality task, ADHD patients showed a significant performance decrement over time. Performances at the VC correlated with CPT II measures.Conclusion ADHD children are vulnerable to a time on task effect on performances which could explain part of their difficulties. Virtual reality is a reliable method to test ADHD children ability to sustain performances over time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpn.2012.01.006

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bioulac, S., Lallemand, S., Rizzo, A., Philip, P., Fabrigoule, C., & Bouvard, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Centre Hospitalier Charles Perrens (FR)
Corresponding author
Bioulac, Stéphanie
Venue
European Journal of Paediatric Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
514-521
ISSN
1090-3798 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156087012
Cited by
100
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Paediatric Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, virtual learning environments, virtual reality, time on task, sustained attention, children, neuropsychological assessment, attentional performance
MeSH terms
Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Computer Simulation, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Schools, Time Factors, User-Computer Interface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review