Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 715

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The limits of trust-free systems: A literature review on blockchain technology and trust in the sharing economy

Hawlitschek, Florian, Notheisen, Benedikt, Teubner, Timm·2018·Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
DOI 10.1016/j.elerap.2018.03.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.elerap.2018.03.005

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 106

  1. Abramova, 2016, Impression management in the sharing economy: understanding the effect of response strategy to. Die Unternehmung – Swiss, J. Bus. Res. Pract., 70, 58
  2. Abramova, O., Shanvanova, T., Fuhrer, A., Krasnova, H., Buxmann, P., 2015. Understanding the Sharing Economy: The Role of Response to negative Reviews in the Peer-To-Peer Accommodation Sharing Network. In: ECIS 2015 Proceedings.
  3. Ahangama, S., Poo, D.C.C., 2016. Credibility of Algorithm Based Decentralized Computer Networks Governing Personal Finances: The Case of Cryptocurrency. In: HCIBGO 2016 Proceedings. pp. 165–176. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39396-4 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39396-4
  4. Albinsson, 2012, Alternative marketplaces in the 21st century: building community through sharing events, J. Consum. Behav., 11, 303, 10.1002/cb.1389 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Albiston, G., Osman, T., Peytchev, E., 2014. Modelling trust in semantic web applications. In: UKSim 2014 Proceedings. pp. 440–445. doi:10.1109/UKSim.2014.62 · DOI
  6. Alexopoulos, N., Daubert, J., Muhlhauser, M., Habib, S.M., 2017. Beyond the hype: On using blockchains in trust management for authentication. In: Proceedings – 16th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications, 11th IEEE International Conference on Big Data Science and Engineering and 14th IEEE International Conference on Embedded Software and Systems. pp. 546–553. doi:10.1109/Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS.2017.283 · DOI
  7. Avital, M., King, J.L., Beck, R., Rossi, M., Teigland, R., 2016. Jumping on the Blockchain Bandwagon : lessons of the Past and Outlook to the Future Panel. In: ICIS 2016 Proceedings.
  8. Ba, 2002, Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: price premiums and Buyer behavior, MIS Q., 26, 243, 10.2307/4132332 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Baek, 2014, Bitcoins as an investment or speculative vehicle? A first look, Appl. Econ. Lett., 1
  10. Ballús-Armet, 2014, Peer-to-Peer Carsharing, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, 2416, 27, 10.3141/2416-04 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Beck, R., Stenum Czepluch, J., Lollike, N., Malone, S., 2016. Blockchain - The Gateway to trust-free cryptographic Transactions. In: ECIS 2016 Proceedings.
  12. Belk, 2014, You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online, J. Bus. Res., 67, 1595, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Belk, 2010, Sharing, J. Consum. Res., 36, 715, 10.1086/612649 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Belk, 2007, Why Not Share Rather than Own?, Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci., 611, 126, 10.1177/0002716206298483 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Bellare, 2009, Security proofs for identity-based identification and signature schemes, J. Cryptol., 22, 1, 10.1007/s00145-008-9028-8 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Benbasat, 2003, The Identity Crisis Within The IS Discipline: defining and Communicating The Discipline’s Core Properties, MIS Q., 27, 183, 10.2307/30036527 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Bogner, A., Chanson, M., Meeuw, A., 2016. A Decentralised Sharing App running a Smart Contract on the Ethereum Blockchain. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Internet of Things – IoT’16. pp. 177–178. doi:10.1145/2991561.2998465 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Böhme, 2015, Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance, J. Econ. Perspect., 29, 213, 10.1257/jep.29.2.213 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Bolton, 2004, How Effective Are Electronic Reputation Mechanisms ? An Experimental Investigation, Manage. Sci., 50, 1587, 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0199 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Chan, 2017, A Statistical Analysis of Cryptocurrencies, J. Risk Financ. Manage., 10, 12, 10.3390/jrfm10020012 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Cheng, 2016, Sharing economy: a review and agenda for future research, Int. J. Hosp. Manage., 57, 60, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.06.003 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Chica, M., Chiong, R., Adam, M.T.P., Damas, S., Teubner, T., 2017. An evolutionary trust game for the sharing economy. 2017 IEEE Congr. Evol. Comput. CEC 2017 – Proc. 2510–2517. doi:10.1109/CEC.2017.7969610 · DOI
  23. Connolly, A.J., Kick, A., 2015. What differentiates early organization adopters of bitcoin from non-adopters?. In: AMCIS 2015 Proceedings. pp. 1–6. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.4730.8645 · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.4730.8645
  24. Davidson, 2016, Economics of Blockchain, Soc. Sci. Res. Netw., 1–23
  25. De Filippi, 2017, What blockchain means for the sharing economy, Harv. Bus Rev.
  26. Deng, C., Ravichandran, T., 2017. How Consumers Perceive Trustworthiness of Providers in Sharing Economy: Effects of Photos and Comments on Demand at Airbnb. In: AMCIS 2017 Proceedings.
  27. Dinger, J., Hartenstein, H., 2006. Defending the sybil attack in P2P networks: Taxonomy, challenges, and a proposal for self-registration. In: ARES 2006 Proceedings. pp. 756–763. doi:10.1109/ARES.2006.45 · DOI
  28. Douceur, J.R., 2002. The Sybil Attack. In: International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems. pp. 251–260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60784-3. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Dredge, 2015, The collaborative economy and tourism: Critical perspectives, questionable claims and silenced voices, Tour. Recreat. Res., 40, 286, 10.1080/02508281.2015.1086076 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Ert, 2017, What in a photo makes you trust a person online? A structural equation modeling approach, SSRN Electron. J., 10.2139/ssrn.2992043 · DOI
  31. Forno, 2015, Sharing economy in travel and tourism: the case of home-swapping in italy, J. Qual. Assur. Hosp. Tour., 16, 202, 10.1080/1528008X.2015.1013409 · DOI
  32. Fraiberger, 2015, Peer-to-peer rental markets in the sharing economy, NYU Stern Sch. Bus. Res. Pap., 10012, 1
  33. Fuerstenau, D., Kliewer, N., 2014. Standard Diffusion in Growing Networks: Modeling Interaction Patterns. In: ECIS 2014 Proceedings. pp. 1–10.
  34. Gao, S., Jing, J., Guo, H., 2017. The Role of Trust with Car-Sharing Services in the Sharing Economy in China: From the Consumers’ Perspective. In: International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57931-3 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57931-3
  35. Glaser, F., 2017. Pervasive Decentralisation of Digital Infrastructures : A Framework for Blockchain enabled System and Use Case Analysis. In: HICSS 2017 Proceedings. pp. 1543–1552. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Glaser, 2015, Beyond cryptocurrencies – a taxonomy of decentralized consensus systems, ECIS, 2015 Complet. Res. Pap., 1–18
  37. Glaser, F., Zimmermann, K., Haferkorn, M., Weber, M.C., Siering, M., 2014. Bitcoin - Asset or Currency? Revealing Users’ Hidden Intentions. In: ECIS 2014 Proceedings. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42448-4_6 · DOI
  38. Goes, 2013, Information systems research and behavioral economics, MIS Q., 37
  39. Greiner, M., Wang, H., 2015. Trust-free Systems - A New Research and Design Direction to Handle Trust Issues in P2P Systems : The Case of Bitcoin. In: AMCIS 2015 Proceedings.
  40. Hamari, 2016, The sharing economy: why people participate in collaborative consumption, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 67, 2047, 10.1002/asi.23552 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Han, H., Koo, C., Chung, N., 2016. Implication of the fit between airbnb and host characteristics. In: ICEC 2016 Proceedings. doi:10.1145/2971603.2971613 · DOI
  42. Hartl, 2016, Do we need rules for “what’s mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities, J. Bus. Res., 69, 2756, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Hawlitschek, F., Teubner, T., Gimpel, H., 2016b. Understanding the sharing economy – Drivers and impediments for participation in peer-to-peer rental. In: HICSS 2016 Proceedings. pp. 4782–4791. · DOI · Paper page
  44. Hawlitschek, 2016, Trust in the Sharing Economy. Die Unternehmung – Swiss, J. Bus. Res. Pract., 70, 26
  45. Hofmann, 2017, Power versus trust – what matters more in collaborative consumption?, J. Serv. Mark., 31, 589, 10.1108/JSM-09-2015-0279 · DOI
  46. Horton, 2016, Owning, Using and Renting: Some Simple Economics of the “Sharing Economy”, NBER Work. Pap. Ser., 42
  47. Huckle, 2016, Internet of Things, Blockchain and Shared Economy Applications, Procedia Comput. Sci., 58, 461, 10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.074 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Hur, Y., Jeon, S., Yoo, B., 2015. Is Bitcoin a Viable E-Business ?: Empirical Analysis of the Digital Currency ’ s Speculative Nature. In: ICIS 2015 Proceedings.
  49. Ingram, C.E., Morisse, M., 2016. Almost an MNC: Bitcoin entrepreneurs’ Use of collective resources and decoupling to build legitimacy. In: HICSS 2016 Proceedings. pp. 4083–4092. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2016.507 · DOI
  50. Ingram, C.E., Morrisse, M., Teigland, R., 2016. “A bad apple went away”: Exploring resilience among bitcoin entrepreneurs. In: ECIS 2016 Proceedings.
  51. John, 2012, Sharing and Web 2.0: the emergence of a keyword, New Media Soc., 15, 167, 10.1177/1461444812450684 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Kamal, P., Chen, J.Q., 2016. Trust in Sharing Economy. In: PACIS 2016 Proceedings.
  53. Katz, 2015, Regulating the sharing economy, Berkeley Technol. Law J., 30, 1067
  54. Kazan, E., Tan, C.-W., Lim, E.T.K., 2015. Value Creation in Cryptocurrency Networks: towards A Taxonomy of Digital Business Models for Bitcoin Companies. In: PACIS 2015 Proceedings.
  55. Kim, J., Yoon, Y., Zo, H., 2015. Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: A Social Exchange Perspective. In: PACIS 2015 Proceedings.
  56. Knote, R., Blohm, I., 2016. Deconstructing the Sharing Economy: On the Relevance for IS Research. In: MKWI 2016 Proceedings.
  57. Levy, 2006, A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research, Inform. Sci., 9, 181
  58. Li, 2015, A hash based remote user authentication and authenticated key agreement scheme for the integrated EPR information system, J. Med. Syst., 39, 10.1007/s10916-015-0322-3 · DOI
  59. Liang, 2018, Exploring the relationship between satisfaction, trust and switching intention, repurchase intention in the context of Airbnb, Int. J. Hosp. Manage., 69, 41, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.10.015 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Lu, 2010, From virtual community members to C2C e-commerce buyers: Trust in virtual communities and its effect on consumers’ purchase intention, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., 9, 346, 10.1016/j.elerap.2009.07.003 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Ma, X., Hancock, J.T., Lim Mingjie, K., Naaman, M., 2017. Self-Disclosure and Perceived Trustworthiness of Airbnb Host Profiles. In: CSCW 2017 Proceedings. pp. 2397–2409. doi:10.1145/2998181.2998269 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Mai, F., Bai, Q., Shan, Z., Wang, X. (Shane), Chiang, R.H.L., 2015. The Impacts of Social Media on Bitcoin Performance. In: ICIS 2015 Proceedings. · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2545957
  63. Matzner, M., Chasin, F., Todenhöfer, L., 2015. To Share or not to Share – Towards Understanding the Antecedents of Participation in IT-enabled Sharing Services. In: ECIS 2015 Proceedings.
  64. Mayer, 1999, The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: a field quasi-experiment, J. Appl. Psychol., 84, 123, 10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123 · Paper page
  65. Mazzella, 2016, How digital trust powers the sharing economy: the digitization of trust, IESE Insight, 24–31
  66. McKnight, 2002, The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: a trust building model, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 11, 297, 10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00020-3 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Mittendorf, C., 2017a. The non-monetary Sharing Economy: An Example of Trust and Risk on Couchsurfing. In: AMCIS 2017 Proceedings. pp. 1–13.
  68. Mittendorf, C., 2017b. Societal Transformation through the Sharing Economy: An example of Trust and Risk on Couchsurfing (pretest). In: PACIS 2017 Proceedings. pp. 1–13.
  69. Mittendorf, C., 2017c. How Trust and Risk Influence Sharing Intentions on Airbnb? Completed Research Paper. In: PACIS 2017 Proceedings. p. 13.
  70. Mittendorf, C., 2017d. Does It Make a Difference ? Business and Private Customers in the Sharing Economy. In: PACIS 2017 Proceedings.
  71. Mittendorf, C., 2016. What Trust means in the Sharing Economy: A provider perspective on Airbnb.com. In: AMCIS 2016 Proceedings.
  72. Mittendorf, C., Ostermann, U., 2017. Private vs. Business Customers in the Sharing Economy–The implications of Trust, Perceived Risk, and Social Motives on Airbnb. In: HICSS 2017 Proceedings. pp. 5827–5836. · DOI
  73. Möhlmann, 2015, Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again, J. Consum. Behav., 14, 193, 10.1002/cb.1512 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Nakamoto, S., 2008. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System [WWW Document]. www.bitcoin.org. doi:10.1007/s10838-008-9062-0 · DOI
  75. Notheisen, B., Hawlitschek, F., Weinhardt, C., 2017b. Breaking Down the Blockchain Hype – Towards a Blockchain Market Engineering Approach. In: ECIS 2017 Proceedings.
  76. Nunes, M., Correia, J., 2013. Improving trust using online credibility sources and social network quality in P2P marketplaces. Inf. Syst. Technol. (CISTI), 2013 8th Iber. Conf. 1–4.
  77. O’Dwyer, K.J., Malone, D., 2014. Bitcoin Mining and its Energy Footprint. In: 25th IET Irish Signals & Systems Conference 2014 and 2014 China-Ireland International Conference on Information and Communities Technologies (ISSC 2014/CIICT 2014). pp. 280–285. doi:10.1049/cp.2014.0699 · DOI · Paper page
  78. Oh, S., Moon, J.Y., 2016. Calling for a Shared Understanding of the “ Sharing Economy,” in: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Electronic Commerce: E-Commerce in Smart Connected World. pp. 1–5. doi:10.1145/2971603.2971638 · DOI
  79. Pazaitis, 2017, Blockchain and value systems in the sharing economy: the illustrative case of Backfeed, Forecast. Soc. Change Technol., 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.025 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Philip, 2015, Examining temporary disposition and acquisition in peer-to-peer renting, J. Mark. Manage., 31, 1310, 10.1080/0267257X.2015.1013490 · DOI
  81. Pinsonneault, 1993, Survey research methodology in management information systems: an assessment, J. Manag. Inf. Syst., 10, 75
  82. Puschmann, 2016, Sharing economy, Bus. Inf Syst. Eng., 58, 93, 10.1007/s12599-015-0420-2 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Risius, 2017, A blockchain research framework, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng., 1–6
  84. Roman, D., Stefano, G., 2016. Towards a reference architecture for trusted data marketplaces: The credit scoring perspective. In: OBD 2016 Proceedings. pp. 95–101. doi:10.1109/OBD.2016.21 · DOI
  85. Rousseau, 1998, Not so different after all: a cross discipline view of trust, Acad. Manage. Rev., 23, 393, 10.5465/amr.1998.926617 · DOI · Paper page
  86. Sas, C., Khairuddin, I., 2017. Design for trust an exploration of the challenges and opportunities of Bitcoin users. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 6499–6510. doi:10.1145/3025453.3025886 · DOI
  87. Sas, C., Khairuddin, I.E., 2015. Exploring Trust in Bitcoin Technology: A Framework for HCI Research. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction. pp. 338–342. doi:10.1145/2838739.2838821. · DOI
  88. Teubner, T., 2014. Thoughts on the sharing economy. In: MCCSIS 2014 Proceedings. pp. 322–326.
  89. Teubner, T., Hawlitschek, F., 2018. The Economics of Peer-to-Peer Online Sharing. In: The Rise of the Sharing Economy: Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities of Collaborative Consumption. ABC-CLIO, pp. 129–156. · DOI
  90. Teubner, T., Saade, N., Hawlitschek, F., Weinhardt, C., 2016. It’s only pixels, badges, and stars: On the economic value of reputation on Airbnb. In: ACIS 2016 Proceedings.
  91. Thierer, 2015, How the Internet, the Sharing Economy, and Reputational Feedback Mechanisms Solve the “Lemons Problem”, Univ. Miami Law Rev., 70, 1
  92. Tussyadiah, 2016, Factors of satisfaction and intention to use peer-to-peer accommodation, Int. J. Hosp. Manage., 55, 70, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.03.005 · DOI · Paper page
  93. Tussyadiah, 2015, An exploratory study on drivers and deterrents of collaborative consumption in travel, Inf. Commun. Technol. Tour., 2015, 1070
  94. Van Lange, 1998, A social dilemma analysis of commuting preferences: the roles of social value orientation and trust, J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 28, 796, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01732.x · DOI · Paper page
  95. von Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A., Brocke, J. Von, Reimer, K., 2009. Reconstructing the Giant: On the Importance of Rigour in Documenting the Literature Search Process. In: ECIS 2009 Proceedings. http://doi:10.1108/09600031211269721. · DOI · Paper page
  96. Wagenknecht, T., Teubner, T., Weinhardt, C., 2017. Peer Ratings and Assessment Quality in Crowd-Based Innovation Processes. In: ECIS 2017 Proceedings.
  97. Webster, J., Watson, R.T., 2002. Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review 26, xiii–xxiii.
  98. Wilson, 2017, Crowdsourcing in a time of empowered stakeholders: lessons from crowdsourcing campaigns, Bus. Horiz., 60, 247, 10.1016/j.bushor.2016.11.009 · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2016.11.009
  99. Wörner D., Von Bomhard T., Schreier Y.-P., Bilgeri D.,2016. The Bitcoin Ecosystem: disruption beyond financial Services? In: ECIS 2016 Proceedings.
  100. Wu, 2016, The Role of Service-provider’s Attributes in Sharing Economy: a Data-driven Study from the Perspective of Trust, Fifteenth Wuhan International Conference on E-Business., 67
  101. Wu, 2017, Chinese travelers’ behavioral intentions toward room-sharing platforms, Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manage., 29, 2688, 10.1108/IJCHM-08-2016-0481 · DOI
  102. Xu, L., Shah, N., Chen, L., Diallo, N., Gao, Z., Lu, Y., Shi, W., 2017. Enabling the Sharing Economy. In: Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Blockchain, Cryptocurrencies and Contracts -–BCC ’17. pp. 15–21. doi:10.1145/3055518.3055527 · DOI
  103. Xu, X., Pautasso, C., Zhu, L., Gramoli, V., Ponomarev, A., Tran, A.B., Chen, S., 2016. The blockchain as a software connector. In: WICSA 2016 Proceedings. pp. 182–191. doi: 10.1109/WICSA.2016.21 · DOI · Paper page
  104. Yang, S., Lee, K., Lee, H., Koo, C., 2016. Trust Breakthrough in the sharing economy: An empirical study of Airbnb. In: PACIS 2016 Proceedings. pp. 131.
  105. Ye, T., Alahmad, R., Pierce, C., Robert Jr, L.P., 2017. Race and Rating on Sharing Economy Platforms: The Effect of Race Similarity and Reputation on Trust and Booking Intention in Airbnb. In: ICIS 2017 Proceedings.
  106. Zarifis, A., Dimitriou, S., Efthymiou, L., 2015. Trust in Digital Currency Enabled Transactions Model. In: MCIS 2015 Proceedings. · DOI

Cited by

See all 715

Metadata

Authors
Hawlitschek, F., Notheisen, B., & Teubner, T.
Venue
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
29
Pages
50-63
ISSN
1567-4223 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.elerap.2018.03.005
OpenAlex
W2790418303
Cited by
715
References
24
FWCI
151.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The limits of trust-free systems: A literature review on blockchain technology and trust in the sharing economy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.elerap.2018.03.005
The paper
Hawlitschek, F., Notheisen, B., & Teubner, T. (2018). The limits of trust-free systems: A literature review on blockchain technology and trust in the sharing economy. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2018.03.005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.