The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Digital Twin predictive maintenance framework of air handling units based on automatic fault detection and diagnostics
Open accessAbstract
The building industry consumes the most energy globally, making it a priority in energy efficiency initiatives. Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems create the heart of buildings. Stable air handling unit (AHU) functioning is vital to ensuring high efficiency and extending the life of HVAC systems. This research proposes a Digital Twin predictive maintenance framework of AHU to overcome the limitations of facility maintenance management (FMM) systems now in use in buildings. Digital Twin technology, which is still at an initial stage in the facility management industry, use Building Information Modeling (BIM), Internet of things (IoT) and semantic technologies to create a better maintenance strategy for building facilities. Three modules are implemented to perform a predictive maintenance framework: operating fault detection in AHU based on the APAR (Air Handling Unit Performance Assessment Rules) method, condition prediction using machine learning techniques, and maintenance planning. Furthermore, the proposed framework was tested in a real-world case study with data between August 2019 and October 2021 for an educational building in Norway to validate that the method was feasible. Inspection information and previous maintenance records are also obtained through the FM system. The results demonstrate that the continually updated data combined with APAR and machine learning algorithms can detect faults and predict the future state of Air Handling Unit (AHU) components, which may assist in maintenance scheduling. Removing the detected operating faults resulted in annual energy savings of several thousand dollars due to eliminating the identified operating faults.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
A review on buildings energy consumption information
Pérez-Lombard, L., Ortiz, J., & Pout, C. (2008) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.03.007 · Cited by 6,649 · cited 2×
“Buildings’ contribution to world energy use, both residential and commercial, has continuously grown, with estimations ranging from 20% to 40% [1,2].”
BackgroundDigital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems
Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2017) · Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4 · Cited by 3,727 · cited 1×
“A few years later, Grieves clarified that he was referring to a set of data that thoroughly characterizes an asset, from its most basic geometry to its most specific function [37].”
BackgroundDigital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification
Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., Traar, G., Henjes, J., & Sihn, W. (2018) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474 · Cited by 3,612
Building Information Modeling (BIM) for existing buildings — Literature review and future needs
Volk, R., Stengel, J., & Schultmann, F. (2014) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.023 · Cited by 2,199
Fusion, propagation, and structuring in belief networks
Pearl, J. (1986) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(86)90072-x · Cited by 2,127
Digital twin and big data towards smart manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 degree comparison
Qi, Q., & Tao, F. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2793265 · Cited by 1,716
A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance
Carvalho, T. P., Soares, F. A. A. M. N., Vita, R., Francisco, R. D. P., Basto, J. P., & Alcalá, S. G. S. (2019) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.106024 · Cited by 1,576
Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research
Boje, C., Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S., & Rezgui, Y. (2020) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179 · Cited by 1,324
Cited by
On Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0: Overview, Models, and Challenges
Achouch, M., Dimitrova, M., Ziane, K., Sattarpanah Karganroudi, S., Dhouib, R., Ibrahim, H., & Adda, M. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12168081 · Cited by 528
AI in structural health monitoring for infrastructure maintenance and safety
Plevris, V., & Papazafeiropoulos, G. (2024) · Infrastructures · doi:10.3390/infrastructures9120225 · Cited by 132
Digital Twin Technology for Bridge Maintenance using 3D Laser Scanning: A Review
Hosamo, H. H., & Hosamo, M. H. (2022) · Advances in Civil Engineering · doi:10.1155/2022/2194949 · Cited by 103
Self-citationAnalysis of Digital Twin Applications in Energy Efficiency: A Systematic Review
Ba, L., Tangour, F., El Abbassi, I., & Absi, R. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17083560 · Cited by 96
Ontology-enabled AI agent-driven intelligent digital twins for building operations and maintenance
Yoon, S., Song, J., & Li, J. (2025) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112802 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Hosamo, H. H., Svennevig, P. R., Svidt, K., Han, D., & Nielsen, H. K.
- Venue
- Energy and Buildings
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-04
- Volume
- 261
- Pages
- 111988
- ISSN
- 0378-7788 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4214478937
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 27.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Digital Twin predictive maintenance framework of air handling units based on automatic fault detection and diagnostics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111988
- The paper
- Hosamo, H. H., Svennevig, P. R., Svidt, K., Han, D., & Nielsen, H. K. (2022). A Digital Twin predictive maintenance framework of air handling units based on automatic fault detection and diagnostics. Energy and Buildings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111988
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.