The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metal 3D printing in construction: A review of methods, research, applications, opportunities and challenges
Open accessAbstract
Abstract 3D printing, more formally known as additive manufacturing (AM), has the potential to revolutionise the construction industry, with foreseeable benefits including greater structural efficiency, reduction in material consumption and wastage, streamlining and expedition of the design-build process, enhanced customisation, greater architectural freedom and improved accuracy and safety on-site. Unlike traditional manufacturing methods for construction products, metal 3D printing offers ready opportunities to create non-prismatic sections, internal stiffening, openings, functionally graded elements, variable microstructures and mechanical properties through controlled heating and cooling and thermally-induced prestressing. Additive manufacturing offers many opportunities for the construction sector, but there will also be fresh challenges and demands, such as the need for more digitally savvy engineers, greater use of advanced computational analysis and a new way of thinking for the design and verification of structures, with greater emphasis on inspection and load testing. It is envisaged that AM will complement, rather than replace, conventional production processes, with clear potential for hybrid solutions and structural strengthening and repairs. These opportunities and challenges are explored in this paper as part of a wider review of different methods of metal 3D printing, research and early applications of additive manufacturing in the construction industry. Lessons learnt for metal 3D printing in construction from additive manufacturing using other materials and in other industries are also presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bos, F., Wolfs, R., Ahmed, Z., & Salet, T. (2016) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867 · Cited by 1,257
Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes
Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Le, T. T., Austin, S. A., Gibb, A. G. F., & Thorpe, T. (2012) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010 · Cited by 1,205
Building components for an outpost on the lunar soil by means of a novel 3D printing technology
Cesaretti, G., Dini, E., De Kestelier, X., Colla, V., & Pambaguian, L. (2014) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.07.034 · Cited by 806
Utilization of structural steel in buildings
Moynihan, M. C., & Allwood, J. M. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2014.0170 · Cited by 141
Cited by
Pan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103517 · Cited by 1,336
Baduge, S. K., Thilakarathna, S., Perera, J. S., Arashpour, M., Sharafi, P., Teodosio, B., Shringi, A., & Mendis, P. (2022) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104440 · Cited by 1,007
“Also, generative algorithms are being employed to optimize the material distribution, which is a key benefit associated with additive Manufacturing [120].”
MethodState of the Art in Directed Energy Deposition: From Additive Manufacturing to Materials Design
Dass, A., & Moridi, A. (2019) · Coatings · doi:10.3390/coatings9070418 · Cited by 667
Kafle, A., Luis, E., Silwal, R., Pan, H. M., Shrestha, P. L., & Bastola, A. K. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13183101 · Cited by 587
A Review of 3D Printing in Construction and its Impact on the Labor Market
Hossain, M. A., Zhumabekova, A., Paul, S. C., & Kim, J. R. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12208492 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Buchanan, C., & Gardner, L.
- Venue
- Engineering Structures
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 180
- Pages
- 332-348
- ISSN
- 0141-0296 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2900608483
- Cited by
- 826
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 38.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.