Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 416

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interactions between polystyrene microplastics and marine phytoplankton lead to species-specific hetero-aggregation

Open access
Long, Marc, Paul-Pont, Ika, Hégaret, Hélène, Moriceau, Brivaela, Lambert, Christophe, Huvet, Arnaud, Soudant, Philippe·2017·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

To understand the fate and impacts of microplastics (MP) in the marine ecosystems , it is essential to investigate their interactions with phytoplankton as these may affect MP bioavailability to marine organisms as well as their fate in the water column. However, the behaviour of MP with marine phytoplanktonic cells remains little studied and thus unpredictable. The present study assessed the potential for phytoplankton cells to form hetero-aggregates with small micro-polystyrene (micro-PS) particles depending on microalgal species and physiological status. A prymnesiophycea , Tisochrysis lutea, a dinoflagellate , Heterocapsa triquetra, and a diatom, Chaetoceros neogracile, were exposed to micro-PS (2 μm diameter; 3.96 μg L −1 ) during their growth culture cycles. Micro-PS were quantified using an innovative flow-cytometry approach, which allowed the monitoring of the micro-PS repartition in microalgal cultures and the distinction between free suspended micro-PS and hetero-aggregates of micro-PS and microalgae . Hetero-aggregation was observed for C. neogracile during the stationary growth phase. The highest levels of micro-PS were “lost” from solution, sticking to flasks, with T. lutea and H. triquetra cultures. This loss of micro-PS sticking to the flask walls increased with the age of the culture for both species. No effects of micro-PS were observed on microalgal physiology in terms of growth and chlorophyll fluorescence . Overall, these results highlight the potential for single phytoplankton cells and residual organic matter to interact with microplastics, and thus potentially influence their distribution and bioavailability in experimental systems and the water column. • Chaetoceros neogracile formed hetero-aggregates with micro-polystyrene. • Hetero-aggregation of C. neogracile increased with culture age. • Micro-polystyrene did not affect growth, morphology or fluorescence of free algal cells. • Microplastic distribution and bioavailability may differ among species and experimental systems. • Flow cytometry and 3D microscopy are good tools for studying MP distribution in water.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.05.047

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Alldredge, 1993, The abundance and significance of a class of large, transparent organic particles in the ocean, Deep. Res. Part I, 40, 1131, 10.1016/0967-0637(93)90129-Q · DOI · Paper page
  2. Arthur, C., Baker, J., Bamford, H., Proceedings of the International Research Workshop on the Occurrence, Effects and Fate of Microplastic Marine Debris. September 9-11, 2008. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS-OR&R-30.
  3. Bendif, 2013, On the description of Tisochrysis lutea gen. nov. sp. nov. and Isochrysis nuda sp. nov. in the isochrysidales, and the transfer of dicrateria to the prymnesiales (haptophyta), J. Appl. Phycol., 25, 1763, 10.1007/s10811-013-0037-0 · DOI
  4. Besseling, 2015, Microplastic in a macro filter feeder: humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae, Mar. Poll. Bull., 95, 248, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.04.007 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Besseling, 2014, Nanoplastic affects growth of S. obliquus and reproduction of D. magna, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 12336, 10.1021/es503001d · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bhaskar, 2005, Production of macroaggregates from dissolved exopolymeric substances (EPS) of bacterial and diatom origin, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 53, 255, 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.12.013 · DOI
  7. Cole, 2013, Microplastic ingestion by zooplankton, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 6646, 10.1021/es400663f · DOI · Paper page
  8. Dalsgaard, 2003, Fatty acid trophic markers in the pelagic marine environment, 227, 10.1016/S0065-2881(03)46005-7 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Davarpanah, 2015, Single and combined effects of microplastics and copper on the population growth of the marine microalgae Tetraselmis chuii, Estuar. Coast. Shelf. Sci., 167, 269, 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.07.023 · DOI
  10. Dodge, 1970, A survey of thecal fine structure in the Dinophyceae, Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 63, 53, 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1970.tb02302.x · DOI
  11. Eriksen, 2014, Plastic pollution in the world's oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea, PLoS One, 9, 1, 10.1371/journal.pone.0111913 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Estrada, 2004, Diversity of planktonic photoautotrophic microorganisms along a salinity gradient as depicted by microscopy, flow cytometry, pigment analysis and DNA-based methods, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 49, 281, 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.04.002 · DOI
  13. Galbraith, 1988, Flow cytometric characterization of the chlorophyll contents and size distributions of plant protoplasts, Cytometry, 9, 75, 10.1002/cyto.990090112 · DOI
  14. Green, 2016, Effects of microplastics on European flat oysters, Ostrea edulis and their associated benthic communities, Environ. Poll., 216, 95, 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.043 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hariskos, 2015, Investigation of cell growth and chlorophyll a content of the coccolithophorid alga Emiliania huxleyi by using simple bench-top flow cytometry, J. Bioprocess. Biotech., 5, 2
  16. Hecky, 1973, Amino-acid and sugar composition of diatom cell-walls, Mar. Biol., 19, 323, 10.1007/BF00348902 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Huvet, 2016, Quantifying the smallest microplastics is the challenge for a comprehensive view of their environmental impacts, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 124
  18. Jambeck, 2015, Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean, Science, 347, 768, 10.1126/science.1260352 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Jemec, 2016, Uptake and effects of microplastic textile fibers on freshwater crustacean Daphnia magna, Environ. Poll., 219, 201, 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.037 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Joiris, 1982, A budget of carbon cycling in the Belgian coastal zone: relative roles of zooplankton, bacterioplankton and benthos in the utilization of primary production, Neth. J. Sea Res., 16, 260, 10.1016/0077-7579(82)90035-7 · DOI
  21. Kiørboe, 1990, Coagulation efficiency and aggregate formation in marine phytoplankton, Mar. Biol., 107, 235, 10.1007/BF01319822 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kiørboe, 1993, Phytoplankton aggregate formation: observations of patterns and mechanisms of cell sticking and the significance of exopolymeric material, J. Plankton Res., 15, 993, 10.1093/plankt/15.9.993 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Lagarde, 2016, Microplastic interactions with freshwater microalgae: hetero-aggregation and changes in plastic density appear strongly dependent on polymer type, Environ. Poll., 215, 331, 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Legrand, 1998, Induced phagotrophy in the photosynthetic dinoflagellate Heterocapsa triquetra, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 15, 65, 10.3354/ame015065 · DOI
  25. Lelong, 2011, A new insight into allelopathic effects of Alexandrium minutum on photosynthesis and respiration of the diatom Chaetoceros neogracile revealed by photosynthetic-performance analysis and flow cytometry, Microb. Ecol., 62, 919, 10.1007/s00248-011-9889-5 · DOI
  26. Lelong, 2011, Cell-based measurements to assess physiological status of Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries, a toxic diatom, Res. Microbiol., 162, 970, 10.1016/j.resmic.2011.06.005 · DOI
  27. Lenz, 2016, Microplastic exposure studies should be environmentally realistic, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 113, 2, 10.1073/pnas.1606615113 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Li, 2016, Marine bacterial transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) and TEP precursors: characterization and RO fouling potential, Desalination, 379, 68, 10.1016/j.desal.2015.10.005 · DOI
  29. Logan, 1989, Potential for increased nutrient uptake by flocculating diatoms, Mar. Biol., 101, 443, 10.1007/BF00541645 · DOI
  30. Long, 2015, Interactions between microplastics and phytoplankton aggregates: impact on their respective fates, Mar. Chem., 175, 39, 10.1016/j.marchem.2015.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Maes, 2017, A rapid-screening approach to detect and quantify microplastics based on fluorescent tagging with Nile Red, Sci. Rep., 7, 44501, 10.1038/srep44501 · DOI
  32. Malviya, 2016, Insights into global diatom distribution and diversity in the world's ocean, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 113, E1516, 10.1073/pnas.1509523113 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Marie, 1999, Enumeration of marine viruses in culture and natural samples by flow cytometry, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65, 45, 10.1128/AEM.65.1.45-52.1999 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Murray, 2011, Plastic contamination in the decapod crustacean Nephrops norvegicus (Linnaeus, 1758), Mar. Pollut. Bull., 62, 1207, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.03.032 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Passow, 2002, Transparent exopolymer particles in aquatic environments, Prog. Oceanogr., 55, 287, 10.1016/S0079-6611(02)00138-6 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Passow, 2002, Production of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) by phyto- and bacterioplankton, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 236, 1, 10.3354/meps236001 · DOI
  37. Passow, 1994, The role of particulate carbohydrate exudates in the flocculation of diatom blooms, Deep Res. Part I, 41, 335, 10.1016/0967-0637(94)90007-8 · DOI
  38. Paul-Pont, 2016, Exposure of marine mussels Mytilus spp. to polystyrene microplastics: toxicity and influence on fluoranthene bioaccumulation, Environ. Poll., 216, 724, 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.039 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Pomati, 2011, An automated platform for phytoplankton ecology and aquatic ecosystem monitoring, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 9658, 10.1021/es201934n · DOI
  40. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2011, R development core team, R. A Lang. Environ. Stat. Comput., 55, 275
  41. Reisser, 2014, Millimeter-sized marine plastics: a new pelagic habitat for microorganisms and invertebrates, PLoS One, 9, 1, 10.1371/journal.pone.0100289 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Rochman, 2016, The ecological impacts of marine debris: unraveling the demonstrated evidence from what is perceived, Ecology, 97, 302, 10.1890/14-2070.1 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Rossi, 2014, Modeling the effect of nano-sized polymer particles on the properties of lipid membranes, J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 26, 503101, 10.1088/0953-8984/26/50/503101 · DOI
  44. Rummel, 2016, Plastic ingestion by pelagic and demersal fish from the north sea and baltic sea, Mar. Poll. Bull., 102, 134, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.11.043 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Sanchez, 2014, Wild gudgeons (Gobio gobio) from French rivers are contaminated by microplastics: preliminary study and first evidence, Environ. Res., 128, 98, 10.1016/j.envres.2013.11.004 · DOI
  46. Setälä, 2014, Ingestion and transfer of microplastics in the planktonic food web, Environ. Poll., 185, 77, 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Sgier, 2016, Flow cytometry combined with viSNE for the analysis of microbial biofilms and detection of microplastics, Nat. Commun., 7, 11587, 10.1038/ncomms11587 · DOI
  48. Shim, 2016, Identification and quantification of microplastics using Nile Red staining, Mar. Poll. Bull., 113, 469, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.10.049 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Sjollema, 2016, Do plastic particles affect microalgal photosynthesis and growth?, Aquat. Toxicol., 170, 259, 10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.12.002 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Sosik, 1989, Chlorophyll fluorescence from single cells: interpretation of flow cytometric signals, Limnol. Oceanogr., 34, 1749, 10.4319/lo.1989.34.8.1749 · DOI
  51. Sussarellu, 2016, Oyster reproduction is affected by exposure to polystyrene microplastics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 113, 2430, 10.1073/pnas.1519019113 · DOI
  52. Tosetto, 2017, Trophic transfer of microplastics does not affect fish personality, Anim. Behav., 123, 159, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.10.035 · DOI
  53. Van Cauwenberghe, 2014, Microplastics in bivalves cultured for human consumption, Environ. Poll., 193, 65, 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.06.010 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Van Sebille, 2015, A global inventory of small floating plastic debris, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 124006, 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124006 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Ward, 2009, Marine aggregates facilitate ingestion of nanoparticles by suspension-feeding bivalves, Mar. Environ. Res., 68, 137, 10.1016/j.marenvres.2009.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Zhang, 2017, Toxic effects of microplastic on marine microalgae Skeletonema costatum: interactions between microplastic and algae, Environ. Poll., 220, 1282, 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.005 · DOI

Cited by

See all 416

Metadata

Authors
Long, M., Paul-Pont, I., Hégaret, H., Moriceau, B., Lambert, C., Huvet, A., & Soudant, P.
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
228
Pages
454-463
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2619462796
Cited by
416
References
14
FWCI
11.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • MICRO project (MICRO 09-002-BE)
  • ANR CESA project (ANR-15-CE34-0006-02)
  • MICROPLASTIC2 project (0214/15008381/00001897, D0S0028206/00)
  • Single Interministerial Fund (FUI)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.