The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of cognitive load on economic decision making: A survey and new experiments
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Cognitive load must be managed for effective problem-solving and clinical decision-making (correct decisions/reduction of errors), as levels of cognitive load influence decisions and outcomes38,49–53.”
From When better data meets better design: How EHR data usability and system usability shape physicians' cognitive load (2026) · cites this paper as [49]
In the citing paper
“Generally, because EHRs have higher data usability prompts, they encourage physicians to engage more deeply with patient information3,4,44,49,54.”
From When better data meets better design: How EHR data usability and system usability shape physicians' cognitive load (2026) · cites this paper as [49]
In the citing paper
“Evidence of a detrimental impact of cognitive load on temporal choices is mixed.”
From Poverty and economic decision making: a review of scarcity theory (2022) · cites this paper as Deck and Jahedi (2015)
In the citing paper
“Additional experiments conducted by Deck and Jahedi (2015) confirmed the above results and showed that cognitive load increased both risk aversion and money-related impatience.”
From Poverty and economic decision making: a review of scarcity theory (2022) · cites this paper as Deck and Jahedi (2015)
In the citing paper
“In their overview of empirical research, Deck and Jahedi (2015) show consistent evidence that cognitive load increases risk aversion.”
From Poverty and economic decision making: a review of scarcity theory (2022) · cites this paper as Deck and Jahedi (2015)
In the citing paper
“These results contradict both the hypothesis that financial scarcity increases risk aversion and findings that cognitive load increases risk aversion (Deck and Jahedi 2015).”
From Poverty and economic decision making: a review of scarcity theory (2022) · cites this paper as Deck and Jahedi 2015
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,563
(2011) · Cited by 14,317
z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments
Fischbacher, U. (2007) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4 · Cited by 9,524
Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting
Laibson, D. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355397555253 · Cited by 6,122
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
Frederick, S. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533005775196732 · Cited by 5,256
Poverty impedes cognitive function.
Mani, A., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., & Zhao, J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1238041 · Cited by 2,967 · cited 1×
“Mani et al. (2013) experimentally prime rich and poor people to think about a looming car repair that varies in its cost.”
BackgroundA Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences
Koszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2006) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/121.4.1133 · Cited by 2,728
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Abaluck, 2011, Choice inconsistencies among the elderly, Am. Econ. Rev., 1180, 10.1257/aer.101.4.1180 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–101 of 101
Merriweather, Lyytinen, K., Aron, D., & Cauley, M. R. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-02243-4 · Cited by 9
“Generally,becauseEHRshavehigherdatausabilityprompts,theyencourage physicianstoengagemoredeeplywithpatientinformation 3,4,44,49,54 .”
Metadata
- Authors
- Deck, C., & Jahedi, S.
- Affiliations
- Chapman University (US)
- RAND Corporation (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jahedi, Salar
- ORCID
- Deck, Cary
- Venue
- European Economic Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 78
- Pages
- 97-119
- ISSN
- 0014-2921 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1717300320
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- European Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Keywords
- cognitive load, economic decision-making, risk aversion, intertemporal choice, anchoring effect, snack selection, numeracy, mathematics achievement, time preference, individual heterogeneity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
