Cited by 304Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis

The effect of cognitive load on economic decision making: A survey and new experiments

Open access
Deck, Cary, Jahedi, Salar·2015·European Economic Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.05.004

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive load must be managed for effective problem-solving and clinical decision-making, as levels of cognitive load influence decisions and outcomes.

    “Cognitive load must be managed for effective problem-solving and clinical decision-making (correct decisions/reduction of errors), as levels of cognitive load influence decisions and outcomes38,49–53.”
  • EHRs with higher data usability prompts encourage physicians to engage more deeply with patient information.

    “Generally, because EHRs have higher data usability prompts, they encourage physicians to engage more deeply with patient information3,4,44,49,54.”
  • Evidence of a detrimental impact of cognitive load on temporal choices is mixed.

    “Evidence of a detrimental impact of cognitive load on temporal choices is mixed.”

    From Poverty and economic decision making: a review of scarcity theory (2022) · cites this paper as Deck and Jahedi (2015)

  • Additional experiments by Deck and Jahedi (2015) confirmed that cognitive load increased both risk aversion and money-related impatience.

    “Additional experiments conducted by Deck and Jahedi (2015) confirmed the above results and showed that cognitive load increased both risk aversion and money-related impatience.”

    From Poverty and economic decision making: a review of scarcity theory (2022) · cites this paper as Deck and Jahedi (2015)

  • Deck and Jahedi (2015) show consistent evidence that cognitive load increases risk aversion.

    “In their overview of empirical research, Deck and Jahedi (2015) show consistent evidence that cognitive load increases risk aversion.”

    From Poverty and economic decision making: a review of scarcity theory (2022) · cites this paper as Deck and Jahedi (2015)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deck, C., & Jahedi, S.
Affiliations
  • Chapman University (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
Corresponding author
Jahedi, Salar
Venue
European Economic Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
78
Pages
97-119
ISSN
0014-2921 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1717300320
Cited by
304
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • European Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Keywords
cognitive load, economic decision-making, risk aversion, intertemporal choice, anchoring effect, snack selection, numeracy, mathematics achievement, time preference, individual heterogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review