Cited by 304Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of cognitive load on economic decision making: A survey and new experiments

Open access
Deck, Cary, Jahedi, Salar·2015·European Economic Review

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.05.004

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Abaluck, 2011, Choice inconsistencies among the elderly, Am. Econ. Rev., 1180, 10.1257/aer.101.4.1180 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 304

Metadata

Authors
Deck, C., & Jahedi, S.
Affiliations
  • Chapman University (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
Corresponding author
Jahedi, Salar
Venue
European Economic Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
78
Pages
97-119
ISSN
0014-2921 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1717300320
Cited by
304
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • European Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Keywords
cognitive load, economic decision-making, risk aversion, intertemporal choice, anchoring effect, snack selection, numeracy, mathematics achievement, time preference, individual heterogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review