Cited by 120Electroconvulsive Therapy StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Plasma Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in treatment-resistant depressed patients receiving electroconvulsive therapy

Piccinni, Armando, Del Debbio, Alessandro, Medda, Pierpaolo, Bianchi, Carolina, Roncaglia, Isabella, Veltri, Antonello, Zanello, Sara, Massimetti, Enrico +2 more·2009·European Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

There is an increasing evidence that the Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) could be involved in the mode of action of antidepressants and, perhaps, of ECT. This study aimed to investigate whether the clinical course of medication-resistant depressed patients following a course of ECT might be associated with changes of plasma BDNF concentrations. Our findings showed that at T0 (baseline) plasma BDNF levels of patients were significantly lower than those of control subjects, and that at T2 (after ECT) were significantly increased in parallel with the decrease of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) total score. However, only remitter patients who showed higher baseline BDNF levels than non-remitters reached normalized BDNF levels after ECT. These findings would suggest the potential usefulness of baseline plasma BDNF levels as predictors of response to ECT in treatment-resistant depressed patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2009.01.002

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Postmortem studies revealed that treatment-resistant MDD patients have significantly lower BDNF levels, especially in BDNF-rich brain structures, such as the hippocampus.

    “Postmortem studies revealed that these treatment-resistant patients have significantly lower BDNF levels, especially in BDNF-rich brain structures, such as the hippocampus [68–70].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piccinni, A., Del Debbio, A., Medda, P., Bianchi, C., Roncaglia, I., Veltri, A., Zanello, S., Massimetti, E., Origlia, N., & Domenici, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • Neuroscience Institute (IT)
  • University of L'Aquila (IT)
Venue
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
349-355
ISSN
0924-977X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086221605
Cited by
120
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion)
Funders
Università di Pisa
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
brain-derived neurotrophic factor, plasma BDNF, electroconvulsive therapy, treatment-resistant depression, antidepressant mechanism, treatment response prediction, remission, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Treatment Outcome, Statistics, Nonparametric, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review