Cited by 375Treatment of Major DepressionTryptophan and brain disordersNerve injury and regeneration

Effect of treatment on serum brain–derived neurotrophic factor levels in depressed patients

Gonul, A. Saffet, Akdeniz, F., Taneli, F., Donat, O., Eker, Ç., Vahip, S.·2005·European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

Researchers have reported that serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (sBDNF) of drug-free depressed patients are lower than those of healthy controls and proposed that low sBDNF levels might reflect failure of neuronal plasticity in depression. In this study, we compared sBDNF levels of depressed patients (n = 28) before and after 8 weeks of antidepressant treatment, with those of healthy controls (n = 18) to test the hypothesis that initially low sBDNF levels of drug-free depressed patients will increase parallel with their clinical response to antidepressant treatment. The severity of depression and response to treatment were assessed with Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). sBDNF was assayed with the sandwich ELISA method. Baseline sBDNF levels of patients (mean, 20.8 ng/ml; [S.D., 6.7]) were significantly lower than those of controls (mean, 26.8 ng/ml; [S.D., 9.3]; p = 0.015), and were negatively correlated with HAM-D scores (r = -0.49, p = 0.007). After 8 weeks of treatment, sBDNF levels of patients had increased significantly (mean, 33.3 ng/ml; [S.D., 9.9]; p < 0.001) and no longer differed from those of controls. These results support the hypothesis that BDNF might play a critical role in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder and successful antidepressant treatment increases the attenuated BDNF levels in depressed patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00406-005-0578-6

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gonul, A. S., Akdeniz, F., Taneli, F., Donat, O., Eker, Ç., & Vahip, S.
Affiliations
  • Ege University (TR)
  • Manisa Celal Bayar University (TR)
Venue
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2005-04-06
Volume
255
Issue
6
Pages
381-386
ISSN
  • 0003-9373 (ISSN-L)
  • 0940-1334
  • 1433-8491
OpenAlex
W2055040288
Cited by
375
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 25
FWCI
15.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ege Üniversitesi
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
brain-derived neurotrophic factor, serum BDNF, major depressive disorder, antidepressant response, depression pathophysiology, neuroplasticity, treatment response biomarkers, depression severity
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review